|
|||||||
|
Obama administration opposes Seoul’s bid to sell old rifles These rifles make a fine addition to any gun collection. IMO Veterans should be given special consideration for surplus sales first. http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/n...71329.html ![]()
|
||
| 08-22-2010, 08:34 AM | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regardless of Obama's campaign promises, it's absurd that we cannot purchase Curio & Relic firearms for fear of gang activity and firearm accidents. Gangs don't use C&R rifles, and accidental firearm-related deaths are at an all time low in recorded U.S. history.
Should we be calling for bans on importing old Studebaker's for fear of a motor vehicle accident, drunk driving, or hit & run? |
|
|
|
|
Korea may just have to wait until they get a more friendly administration in place. It would be a shame for them not to be brought back to the US. Last edited by RealtyViking; 08-22-2010 at 05:05 PM.. |
|
|
Well, U.S. gun collectors could take them, Mr. Obama, or we could just send them down to Africa - they need more guns for child warfare.
For awesome recipes and food storage ideas: http:www.ourfoodstorage.com
|
|
If you have ever handled an M1, you would know that these are not guns used by criminals. They are heavy and would be very hard to conceal. They have been used by soldiers from this country since WWII. They were built for durability on the battlefield, not gang-laden streets.
One more incident of overwhelming generalizations by this administration. |
|
Were these manufactured in Korea, you might have a point. Since they were not, you do not. Personally, I'm interested in keeping other people from building Utopia, because the more you believe you can create heaven on earth the more likely you are to set up guillotines in the public square to hasten the process. -- James Lileks
|
||
|
|
|
|
I think we're missing some very important information here.
These "Korean" rifles are actually lend-lease rifles owned by the United States government. We sent the guns to our allies in many nations around the world after World War II. For example, if memory serves, the guns the CMP is selling right now are returns from Greece. The real issue is about whether the Koreans can legally sell back to us property that's already ours. Obviously, if their intent is to sell rifles that we loaned them for free, then it's appropriate and prudent for the government to block their sale. That said, they should work to re-import the guns so they can be sold to collectors, but I agree with the stance that they shouldn't be re-sold to an importer, since the Koreans don't own them. Now that said, this quote is a little ominous:
Also, it's quite prudent for the administration to be concerned about the weapons falling into evil hands - this "objection" could have been as simple as a request for the Koreans to define how they were going to ensure the security of the shipment while in transit. Maybe the administration's concern was about a container-load of M1 Garands turning up missing when it comes time to unload the boat. I think we can all agree that despite their age, M1 Garands and M1 Carbines are still formidable weapons, and we sure want to make sure that they don't get snatched in transit.
Last edited by Mr.Davis; 08-31-2010 at 06:28 AM.. People can't be bothered with the details, until the details bother the people.
With great power comes great responsibility. ![]() |
||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|