|
|||||||
|
Double your salary in the middle of nowhere, North Dakota The only problem at the moment appears to be housing. They need more ![]() Double your salary in the middle of nowhere, North Dakota [cnn.com]
|
||||
| 09-28-2011, 06:32 AM | |
|
|
|
This has been true for many years. Canada has a similar condition going on. Ontario is doing OK, but many people are looking for work. The oil sands in North Alberta are hurting for people (any type of work, clerical, hard labor, truck, management, operations, etc.)
|
|
Repeating the same mistakes of a failed energy policy that has created countless boom/bust towns across the planet...every now and again I get visions of the Praxis effect
![]() Given present technology, affordable vehicles with ~300 mile range on a single charge should be readily available. How about charging while driving using inductive power transfer? Sounds like a shovel ready project with real long term benefits.
|
|
![]()
![]() Inductive charging gets green flag [sae.org]
|
||||
|
^
Edison won that battle a long time ago, and companies/industries will be damned if they lose power to something that would marginalize them. Edit: The "war" is still TBD, but for now, Edison is still the winner. Last edited by mohater; 09-28-2011 at 07:59 AM.. |
|
Last edited by cruizerfish; 09-28-2011 at 08:21 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
||
|
Current was only one part of the war. Tesla was marginalized (and he self marginalized himself due to his social awkwardness and behaviors) and people have yet to decipher TONS of his notes. For all we know, he had many other things eons ahead of Edison, but since Edison was the business man with power, his plans were pushed down on everyone (infrastructure, delivery, etc.). |
||
|
At any rate, the historical contest between Tesla and Edison was the contest between AC and DC. It is bizarre to me that you would declare Edison the winner and claim that his plans were "pushed down on everyone (infrastructure, delivery, etc.)" when the result was the exact opposite. Not only did AC become the global standard but, as is necessarily true, the infrastructure and distribution model for AC is the global standard. Instead of Edison's more numerous and more localized generation and distribution schemes, we have large plants sending AC over long distances. This is the very thing that made AC so much more viable. Even GE dumped Edison's strategy for AC. Edison won the war of currents like the Japanese won WWII. AC dominance is a triumph of technology over marketing. For all Edison's business savvy he couldn't overcome the fact that Tesla's scheme simply worked better. |
|
|
Is it possible that our children will be the beneficiaries of extraterrestrial generation/transmission in their lifetime? Say the next 50-60 years. TIA
|
||||
|
|
||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What to make of the Presidents speech on the Middle East, specifically with regards to the 1967 borders? | vaultaddict | The Podium | 67 | 05-23-2011 03:57 PM |
| Economy gets in the way of Justice........ | Ryu-bom | The Podium | 26 | 04-27-2011 10:56 AM |
| What is the purpose of unions in these modern times? | andyfico | The Podium | 108 | 02-26-2011 08:42 PM |
| The Shame of Opportunistic Legislation (Rep. McCarthy Readies Anti-Gun Bill in wake of AZ violence) | Mr.Davis | The Podium | 310 | 01-15-2011 07:32 PM |
| A novel approach to having basic needs met in the twilight of your life: rob a bank – get caught. | cruizerfish | The Podium | 34 | 12-16-2010 11:36 AM |