Default blatantly biased CBS News Omits 2nd place Ron Paul from New Hampshire Poll results

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iS9PkWls6j8
Sons of bitches didn't even report on his Iowa caucus results - in the full segment EVERY candidate is named except Ron Paul:
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watc...;earlyshow

Poll info linked from youtube description:
Q7. If the Republican Primary for President of the United States were held
today and the candidates were {alphabetical} Michele Bachmann, Newt Gingrich,
Jon Huntsman, Fred Karger, Ron Paul, Rick Perry, Buddy Roemer, Mitt Romney, or
Rick Santorum for whom will you vote or toward whom would you LEAN at this
time?
N= 500 100%
Michele Bachmann ............................... 01 11 2%
Newt Gingrich .................................. 02 46 9%
Jon Huntsman ................................... 03 37 7%
Fred Karger .................................... 05 3 1%
Ron Paul ....................................... 06 71 14%
Rick Perry ..................................... 07 7 1%
Buddy Roemer ................................... 08 5 1%
Mitt Romney .................................... 09 213 43%
Rick Santorum .................................. 10 29 6%
Undecided (DO NOT READ) ........................ 11 78 16%

And you omit the name of the tv station. THAT is a real bias.

Quote from TRNT : And you omit the name of the tv station. THAT is a real bias.

It would be CBS sir

And here I had been starting to warm up to CBS News again since they're about the only ones that give any time to Fast and Furious, and I thought I could start trusting them for honest reporting.

CBS, your lack of objectivity has failed me for the last time....

Quote from fishy420 : It would be CBS sir

I c;licked on the first link and it not clear what the station is.

What station, sir?

Was it a local news or was it a CBS network news? What is the call number for the station, WCBS?

Quote from TRNT : I c;licked on the first link and it not clear what the station is. What station, sir? Was it a local news or was it a CBS network news? What is the call number for the station, WCBS?

The second link says CBS Early Show and says "CBS News chief political correspondent Jan Crawford" in it.

Quote from Deusxmachina : The second link says CBS Early Show and says "CBS News chief political correspondent Jan Crawford" in it.

Ok, thanks. This is clearly at the very least an omission. Do you have other instances of CBS doing things like this? Is this a pattern or an anecdote? Could this have been simply incompetence or is it something sinister?

I might believe that networks are biased, even diabolical. But I find it hard to believe that they are this stupid.

Quote from TRNT : Do you have other instances of CBS doing things like this?

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-50354...?tag=strip

Six minutes, 22 seconds, with no mention of Paul, but lots of time dedicated to Perry, whom is polling lower than Paul, and even Bachmann at a lowly 2% got video time.

Is this as biased as when Fox used Obama's picture in place of Romney's in their lineup of poll results?

Don't tell me that was just a mistake....

Quote from Deusxmachina : http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-50354...?tag=strip Six minutes, 22 seconds, with no mention of Paul, but lots of time dedicated to Perry, whom is polling lower than Paul, and even Bachmann at a lowly 2% got video time.

You convinced me. This is ridiculous.

Is CBS the only one doing this. Are ABC and NBC more fair to Paul?

seems there is a conspiracy to keep Ron out of the msm headlines and out of viewers minds

Quote from joer316 : seems there is a conspiracy to keep Ron out of the msm headlines and out of viewers minds

Isn't this just the free market being all free and stuff? Wouldn't Ron Paul be the first against some sort of fairness doctrine or equal treatment rule?

no, I do not think obvious omission of the one candidate who is completely different from the others and will challenge the status quo, and who has the overwhelming support of our military, is due to a free market.
And you don't need a fairness doctrine to have unbiased reporting. There is obviously a concerted effort to keep Ron out of the headlines, and/or to paint a picture for the viewer that he is nowhere near the other candidates and that his views are "dangerous".

Ron Paul explained [youtube.com]