|
|||||||
|
Government Arrests Megaupload Executives I guess those lifetime accounts are a bad idea now. Besides the other charges, I thought MU was pretty good at taking down copyrighted materials -- not good enough apparently. |
| 01-19-2012, 03:38 PM | |
|
|
|
Whew, that was close. I caught the season finale of Homeland just in time. Thanks, DOJ!
|
|
Apparently the government allowing them to be a monopoly isn't enough for them. They also need laws to protect their monopolistic practices. I wonder how many years it will take for them to admit they're wrong and actually change their behavior to suit the public's demand. Its been at least 10 years already...
Arnold '08 |
|
|
Like FREE pc games? [cheapassgamer.com]
Want to see how your antivirus stacks up? link [av-comparatives.org] |
|
|
So what happens if they are acquited of all charges, do they get to sue for damage to reputation, lost revenue, etc.?
Glad to see anonymous is now involved, should make this one interesting. mua ha ha.
|
|
|
Anyone want to chime in on this? |
|
|
i am not familiar with this case but seems to me that everytime we discuss this people are just pissed off they can't steal movies/music/tv/porn/books etc. etc. off the internet. Its really hard to take sides with some of you people when that is your concern.
|
|
From what I've read I thought that DMCA said that owners and operators of a domain or site are not liable for the actions of the users content? If it is such the case then why is DoJ going after Megaupload when in fact they should be targeting users uploading copyrighted material?
Oh and if I took a shit on Chris Dodd I couldn't even make him a bigger piece of shit then what he already is. |
|
|
|
|
There is a ton of legit stuff on all filesharing sites and networks. Just like there could be a ton of non-legit stuff on cloud services like iCloud. Where is the line drawn? Could Photobucket be taken down because someone uploads copyrighted images? It's just a power grab at this point. And then, how do they even come up with the $500 million figure? All these lawsuits are a joke. They have no basis for these losses. In reality, their loss could have been $10,000. It could have been $1 million. With regards to pirating, one pirated 'item' does not equal a lost sale from that 'item'. There is no guarantee that without the item being available on sharing networks, a person would opt to buy it instead. I gave up buying CDs almost a decade ago. Why? Not because of Napster. Because back then when a single CD rose to $25, I thought it was absolutely absurd. |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Obama Uses Executive Authority to Make Recess Appointment — While Senate Is Still in Session (Update: 3 more to NLRB) Update: GOP joins suit | Radeck | The Podium | 66 | 04-17-2012 04:03 PM |
| Oil price drops below $103 a barrel after government reports unexpected supply increase | 808Lurker | The Podium | 16 | 01-05-2012 03:09 PM |
| Study: Nearly 1 in 3 will be arrested by age 23 | Ryu-bom | The Podium | 47 | 12-29-2011 08:12 AM |
| High court to hear suit over event arrest by Secret Service | TRNT | The Podium | 8 | 12-06-2011 09:40 AM |
| Do government have the right to install curfews on the population? and is a class war brewing? | Ryu-bom | The Podium | 7 | 10-31-2011 08:15 AM |