|
|||||||
|
You may not need a new audio receiver to go with your new TV!
I just bought a new 65 inch LCD 3D tv.I then thought I needed to upgrade my 10-year old Sony receiver, since it doesn't have any HDMI inputs. I hooked my tv up with all new high-speed HDMI cables to the PS3, cable, and 3D blu-ray player, and used component cables to hook up the Wii, and everything worked great, except the sound was no longer going to my reciever, just the TV. I assume the HDMIs took over and turned off the basic audio out on each device. So, I began my search for a new receiver with 3D capability, at least 4 HDMI inputs, 2 component inputs, and a few regular video inputs. The prices ranged from $250 - $500. I looked around on my lunchbreak a few times and had one narrowed down, and was about to plunk down at least $275. Then it hit me!!! I do NOT need a new reveiver!!! I remembered seeing "audio out" inputs on the back of my tv... could I just put whatever sound was coming from the TV out into my receiver? It was worth a try! and it worked!! I just saved close to $300! The TV works just fine on it's own, and I do not need the receiver to be on to watch and listen to anything. But when I want real surround sound, I lower the volume on the TV and turn on the receiver, and I no longer have to change inputs on the receiver, since I'm only using one input. This is way better than purchasing a new receiver, because if everthing went thru the receiver, then it would probably have to be on all the time, and that would just make things complicated, especially for the wife and kids. Bill Last edited by billd; 03-14-2012 at 06:03 AM.. Yes, I did win a car once.
|
| 03-12-2012, 12:17 PM | |
|
|
|
I came to the same conclusion a couple years ago with my old Onkyo receiver.
My tv, a Samsung, had an optical out (TOSlink)... It supported 5.1 for broadcast TV, but only stereo (2 ch) for all other sources. It turns out that for my case it didn't matter -- all I had to route this way was the wii anyway, and it's 2 channel already. The PS3 I have hooked up to the TV with HDMI, and the receiver with, again, optical out. I could run into trouble if I had any more digital sources I wanted to keep digital, but for now I'm just fine. BTW, a Harmony remote made the configuration much more usable to my family, who would probably have really struggled otherwise. b00k3
|
|
Hook all your devices up as directly to your receiver as possible. Then, hook up your receiver to the TV using the video out ports (you may need one for HDMI connections and another for component/composite). Then, enjoy sound that's WAAAAY better than what you're currently getting. I
slickdeals:Staples = revenue stream $2.93: 6 Omaha steaks spices& sauces $12: 10 (good!) DVDs $138: Zen X-Fi 32 gb ![]() $50: 2GBA micros PacMan collection $4: ToyStory 1&2 BR/DVD 2x TS3 movie tix $45: 8 bags M&Ms 4Orville 6packs 2 Redbox 3 blurays 2 DVDs 4 movie tix 1 Bisquick $262: 50" LED TV PM CB $7: DKC3ds preorder One happy wife! Drink Coke products but don't know what MCR means? I'd be much obliged if you PMed me codes (under the caps or box flaps) |
|
|
Marshall: Have the rest of you guys figured out by now that mmathis is the smartest guy on SlickDeals?
www.pardus.at - only for those with little or no life |
|
|
I run two Altec wireless speaker systems from the audio out on my Samsung TV and it works like a charm.
I'm more than satisfied with the regular stereo sound. As it is, playing a movie with more dynamic sound, can scare the pants off me when a loud thing happens, like a bomb exploding, or whatever. Surround sound would leave me looking over my shoulder for the rest of my life. I like a bit of distance between my reality and the stuff on my TV. I may be part of a minority and y'all might even laugh at me for not wanting the full surround experience, but that's just the way it is for me. I'm much happier with $800 of good quality American made speakers than I would be with a full surround sound Asian made system with a bunch of white noise speakers. Sometimes, quality is better than quantity. |
|
|
|
|
|
Using audio out from TV to receiver will most likely only give you 2.1 audio. If you don't care about surround sound then sure ... go with that option. But for people like me with a 7.1 speakers setup, can't cheap out on a receiver I'm right 97% of the time. Who cares about the other 4%
|
|
|
I don't know how anyone can "hate" surround sound. If you have just the TV speakers on the sound is coming from one spot, turn the surround on and it fills the room, what's not to like? If you don't like sound coming from behind you, don't use rear speakers, or place them more to the front.
My setup sounds very good, I would never know if it's Dolby Digital, DTS, or HD-audio anyway. If something moves across the screen, and the sound follows with it, I'm good. Bill |
|
However, it just dawned on me that your receiver may have only stereo connections anyway. Does it have digital coax (orange RCA) or TOSLINK (optical) plugs on it? If not, the best you could get would be analog surround sound which would require an external decoder (like a sound card). However, if it does have digital inputs, do yourself a favor and use them. The difference between "real" surround sound and a matrix mode is gigantic. At the most, it'll cost you a few bucks for a couple cables from monoprice. And if you want to make things even easier, 20-50 for some type of Harmony remote. Using a surround sound receiver for matrixed stereo sound is like using a ferrari to pick up your mail at the end of the driveway. Last edited by bonkman; 03-13-2012 at 08:42 AM.. |
|
|
Maybe YOU do not need a new receiver for your new TV, but I upgrade receivers faster than I do TVs. In fact I am thinking of doing so again, from my Yamaha RX-V2600 to the RX-A2010. As I get more toys with HDMI output, it would be nice to have more HDMI inputs and direct iPod inputs as well. I max out the HDMI on the old one with my TiVo and PS3. I would like to be able to plug in an AppleTV to do streaming video and my laptop at times as well to preview powerpoint presentations.
So just because you may have no problem living in the audio / video stone age does not mean that the rest of us would ever consider it. Also, the fact that you would only spend $300 on an A/V receiver means that you probably do not realize how good it can sound anyway. Speed does not kill. In fact speed never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary that's what gets you. - Jeremy Clarkson, Top Gear S06E10
Intel i7 950 @ 4ghz | Corsair H80 | Gigabyte GA-X58-USB3 mobo | 18GB DDR3-1333 RAM | 4 x 2TB HD | Sapphire Radeon HD5770 w/3 monitors | Triple boot Lion/Win7/Fedora |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Calling All Stereo Receiver Experts (please help a n00b) | Joe Davola | Tech Support | 13 | 03-12-2012 11:20 AM |
| I think I need a new power supply. My power went out and now my PC won't turn on. | darien95 | Tech Support | 12 | 11-22-2011 11:44 PM |
| Need help...do I need a router or switch for this set-up? | Kerry71 | Tech Support | 8 | 06-29-2011 04:49 AM |
| Need a new washing machine, can you recommend one? | In2Photos | Tech Support | 15 | 04-02-2011 02:37 PM |
| Wireless printer + 2 netbooks w/wifi - do i need a router? | bezelbub | Tech Support | 5 | 10-10-2010 08:51 AM |