|
|||||||
|
"self identification " with a list of poll results tells me nothing. What are you asking? |
|
| 04-06-2012, 02:11 PM | |
|
|
|
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/n...nd-studies
About 60% support the death penalty. Usual the question is just "for murder" though not always. I think if the question was "Do you support the death penalty for serial child rapist murderers?" the number would go up. If I appear to be ignoring your posts, it's probably because you are on my ignore list.
Xuéxi zhōngwén |
|
It's pointless to keep people in prison for life without parole. People like this can't be rehabilitated, as the psychology community has proven over and over so why are we keeping them alive?
If the man who molested your son/daughter or raped your wife were not in prison, would you buy him three meals a day and pay his rent? No? Then why the hell would you pay the state to do it? Last edited by 420; 04-06-2012 at 03:18 PM.. I have degrees in both animal behaviorism and psychology and have come to the conclusion that animals make a hell of a lot more sense than people.
![]() |
|
|
I generally support the death penalty, but I do think that we should take whatever time we need to make sure that the person who is being executed is guilty. If DNA becomes available, after the fact, the court should be required to hear this evidence. I don't think they should have the option to block it, just because it might prove they sent the wrong guy to death row, besides it might confirm the guilty verdict.
If one has to abide intolerance to be considered tolerant, then the word loses it's meaning.
|
|
“Don’t go around saying the world owes you a living. The world owes you nothing. It was here first.”
― Mark Twain |
|
|
How interesting that you have no problem condemning the opinions of liberals with whom you disagree, yet can't bring yourself to condemn the bigoted opinions of the ultra-conservatives on this forum... "You have not converted a man because you have silenced him." -- John Morley
"I just helped your mother kill someone. That 'old lady' enough for you?" -- Tara Knowles |
||
|
Are you asking me to answer a question, and if so please specify the question(s) specifically and I'll answer them. If you want me to comment on some survey results, please describe specifically what you want. I'm not trying to be evasive, I'm just really not understanding what you are trying to do or what you want. ![]() Edit: Perhaps you were trying to make your point using the survey and the statistics. If that's the case, then OK. Perhaps it's my bad for not understanding and I apologize, or perhaps we are so far disconnected that I'm unable to even remotely read your mind. Last edited by nobama; 04-06-2012 at 06:40 PM.. |
|
|
Will you please answer this question? Thanks. Do you think the attitude of people re early term abortions has become less or more anti- abortion rights since roe v wade? Last edited by TRNT; 04-06-2012 at 06:48 PM.. |
|
|
I imagine many people move from being anti-DP to pro-DP as they get older. My transition was actually in the reverse. I recall listening to debates on the subject in college (in my argumentative writing corses for example), and I tended to side with the pro-DP position. As a matter of 'cruel and unusual punishment', I still believe the DP would be permissible. On the issue of the cost to execute (ie, costing more to execute than to house), it's debatable.
But the issue that really turned me around on the subject was finding out the staggering number of completely innocent people who were sentenced to death, and exonerated years or decades later. Not just a handful, but hundreds upon hundreds. And then to extrapolate this to the thousands who must have already been executed over the years, and the thousands more for whom DNA was never collected or who were convicted on circumstantial evidence and have no chance of reprieve. It is amazing to me that even in cases where DNA was collected, most of the time, it is never even tested due to time and budget constraints. I have also seen far to many stories of ambitious or ambivalent prosecutors who will flatly deny evidence which clearly exonerates the defendant because they have invested too much in the case to let it go. For some, their pride and politics are more important to them than an innocent man's freedom (or life). In some cases, even when families fought for (and privately paid for) DNA to be tested and it turned out to prove the defendant's innocence, the prosecutor argued to have the evidence suppressed. Such behavior should itself be a crime. So, while I understand the position of those who still support the DP, politics aside, I think the risks outweigh the rewards. And I'm not sure there will ever be a time when such a punishment can be applied without collateral damage. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mississippi Amendment 26: Personhood | Ryu-bom | The Podium | 228 | 11-11-2011 01:37 PM |
| The party of Death? | ShengD | The Podium | 145 | 10-05-2011 03:43 PM |
| Illinois' Death Row Officially Shuts Down | Elmer | The Podium | 39 | 07-04-2011 11:00 AM |
| Court rules for inmate who wants DNA testing | TRNT | The Podium | 48 | 03-08-2011 02:17 PM |
| Study: States can't afford death penalty | rrc06 | The Podium | 66 | 11-04-2010 09:32 PM |