Judge Strikes Down Part of NDAA, Rules Obama Must Obey Constitution

Quote from NM 156 : The judge struck down sections of it just like the article says...

And yet that's not what the title says.

Quote : Why don't you e-mail the author of this article as well and demand a retraction...

Good point, I will. Will post the response if I get one.

Quote from paperboy05 : And yet that's not what the title says. Good point, I will. Will post the response if I get one.

You still didn't answer... Do you support NDAA?...

Quote from NM 156 : You still didn't answer... Do you support NDAA?...

Why would I answer, that has nothing to do with what I've been saying.

Quote from paperboy05 : Why would I answer, that has nothing to do with what I've been saying.

Since you're nitpicking details on this issue... It's curious as to why it matters... Do you support NDAA?...

Quote from NM 156 : Since you're nitpicking details on this issue... It's curious as to why it matters...

Because you continue to be so dense about it. You could have easily said "yes, I agree, the article's title is flawed, but per Podium rules I went with it", but you didn't, you continually tried to say that the title was accurate.

If NDAA is so bad, why continue to muddy the waters with the insistence that the title is accurate, when you could just own up to it's shoddiness and direct the thread back to discussion on the section that actually was struck? 1021 was the section that was struck and it was the section that produced the most outcry in terms of this bill.

Quote from paperboy05 : Because you continue to be so dense about it. You could have easily said "yes, I agree, the article's title is flawed, but per Podium rules I went with it", but you didn't, you continually tried to say that the title was accurate. If NDAA is so bad, why continue to muddy the waters with the insistence that the title is accurate, when you could just own up to it's shoddiness and direct the thread back to discussion on the section that actually was struck? 1021 was the section that was struck and it was the section that produced the most outcry in terms of this bill.

You're still dodging the question... Do you support NDAA?... That response suggests you are Pro - NDAA...

Quote from NM 156 : You're still dodging the question...

Because as I've said it has no bearing on what I've been saying.

Quote : That response suggests you are Pro-NDAA...

This response suggests you don't care what I think.

Quote : Do you support NDAA?

Parts of it. There's your answer.

Now, why couldn't you just own up that the author of the article in the OP was misleading in terms of the title?

Quote from paperboy05 : Because as I've said it has no bearing on what I've been saying. This response suggests you don't care what I think. Parts of it. There's your answer. Now, why couldn't you just own up that the author of the article in the OP was misleading in terms of the title?

That's between you and the author... I have no problem with the title...

Quote from paperboy05 : Why would I answer, that has nothing to do with what I've been saying.

In a recent very similar situation andyfico opined that I should answer the question and piled on. Let's see how consistent he is.

Quote from andyfico : Fine. But you still haven't answered the question.

Quote from paperboy05 : Parts of it. There's your answer.

I am so disappointed you caved in. And I was so rooting for you.

just trying to rile you up to keep going back and forth...making comments....and to argue...that way then another one of their buddies can MA the thread to get it closed...pretty obvious...mods even know that's what they're doing..its easy to fall for, which I am guilty of.......just agree to disagree...

Quote from papitosabe : just trying to rile you up to keep going back and forth...making comments....and to argue...that way then another one of their buddies can MA the thread to get it closed...pretty obvious...mods even know that's what they're doing..its easy to fall for, which I am guilty of.......just agree to disagree...

MA'ing is a p...y-ass move... When you realize you lost the argument you started... Cry to the mods...

Quote from NM 156 : MA'ing is a p...y-ass move... When you realize you lost the argument you started... Cry to the mods...

The mods won't do anything unless you're breaking the rules.

If you don't want threads deleted, stop trolling or spamming.

Quote from 124nic8 : The mods won't do anything unless you're breaking the rules. If you don't want threads deleted, stop trolling or spamming.

I don't troll... Responding to trolls is not sppamming...