|
|||||||
|
2) What is the #1 purpose of any camera? To take great pictures or close to it as possible, right? So for me, there isn't any component of the camera that is responsible for this task more than the SENSOR (dismissing the photographer's skills of course). Sure you can say the glass that's attached to the front of the sensor matters, the speed and accuracy of the focus, the image stabilization (in-body or on lenses) or the image processor ect..ect... but to me it comes down to the SENSOR. Try using that same well-regarded Olympus 45/1.8 lens on the EP-1 and then switch the lens over to the EM-5 and tell me why sensor don't matter when it comes to image quality. Speaking of image quality, sure the reviews and accolades of your soon arriving E-M5 only tell part of the story. At the end of the day, I trust what my own eyes see more than what the review charts or graphs tell me. And from the numerous samples that I've seen on DPreview forums, that new 16mp sensor comes close to matching the Sony's APS-C sensor in the NEX5n but stills lack behind in terms of overall dynamic range, tonality and great high ISO (beyond 3200). So enjoy your EM5's weather sealing, blazing fast auto-focus, 5-axis IBIS, built-in EVF, great Olympus jpg engine. But when it comes to that 16mp sensor, think about the SENSOR in the NEX-5N or the NEX-7 and then please dont forget to say to yourself "close but no cigar". To buy, or not to buy: That is the question.
|
|
| 05-25-2012, 11:18 PM | |
|
|
|
The K-5 sensor *is* the Sony sensor used in the NEX-5N or A57. With Sony SLT they decide to put a translucent mirror in front to eat up 1/3rd light because Sony believes most people think EVFs and full-time video autofocus is worth it. Sony SLT's do not sell that well compared to the big boys regardless of them making the best sensors. Having the 'best' sensor is over-rated and actually does not affect most of your shots as much as the glass in front of it. It affects shots where you deliberately want to pull shadows and makes things feasible there. Just like a weather-sealed camera affects shots where you deliberately put yourself out into the...you know weather? I would say the possibility of your camera not working from one moment to the next has a substantial affect on the pictures you take...or more accurately the pictures you soon won't be taking. But sure sit inside your dorm room and take pictures out from behind your window and the Sony sensors will be the best at capturing the bright scene outside your window as you pull up your poorly lit dorm room. But you know the moment someone chooses to actually leave their dorm room and stop taking pictures of their gundam models, its pretty darn nice to have a camera well suited for travel...and you know quite possibly the weather to go along with it. It is sad when a 3rd-party company like Sigma comes in and makes just about the best compatible NEX lenses that Sony fanboys have ever experienced...yet for *any* other manufacturer Sigma gear is second-rate. Last edited by timbukto; 05-26-2012 at 12:53 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Great camera but price isn't everything...Look before you leap
$850 for this caliber of camera is an excellent deal. If you are invested in Pentax system and satisfied, then you probably have already pulled the plastic out and now eagerly waiting for the camera to arrive.However, if you are new to photography with perhaps a P&S or entry level DSLR and thinking about making it a serious hobby, I would recommend you consider carefully the decision to invest (and commit) in a camera system, especially Pentax. I love Pentax gear and was a committed Pentaxian for over 30 years until I finally made the decision to change systems in 2008. I still have a K10D and many manual focus K-mount prime lenses that I just can't bear to part with but will probably never use. My decision was based on the lack of availability of gear (primarly newer quality AF lenses) and virtually non-existant support by 3rd party suppliers. Regrettably, after being one of the major innovators in photography Pentax is now a niche player. To summarize, the K5 is a serious camera which assumes the user has moved beyond P&S photography. It fits in the "enthusiast, advanced amateur" market. At this level, glass and accessories become the bigger and more important investment. I would say you will have a minimum of $1,500 in addition to the camera body for a fast prime, couple of medium quality zooms and flash ... just to get started. That now puts you at around $2,500. Unless you just gotta have this camera, there are much better ways to spend your money in camera gear that will allow you to continue to grow and develop. |
|
You're welcome to have different priorities of course, but I feel that unless you're a working professional pushing the camera very hard for publication/sale, almost any ILC sensor from the Nikon 1 on up is more than adequate. From the rest of the post, I'm not sure you really even disagree with me so much as we're just talking at cross-odds a bit. But when I got started in the high end camera thing, I fell for the trap of rabidly chasing sensor performance with total disregard for everything else, and I think it's important to emphasize for anyone reading that there is a lot, lot more to a camera than a little chip in the middle. Last edited by Promit; 05-26-2012 at 10:36 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
||
|
If you want to read about which Nikon lenses would be ok for a Pentax camera, check out this thread: nikon lenses on a Pentax? [pentaxforums.com] My uncle has a d7000 (very nice camera btw using the same sensor that is in the Pentax K5) and his old Nikor lenses won't work on his cam, but work fine on my K5! But I have enough old manual lenses, so I gave them back to him. |
|
|
As for a fast 24... yes you are quite correct that Pentax has a gap here. I have been using the Sigma 24 1.8 though and it works well, albeit in a large form factor that weighs way more than it should. Here are some samples I've taken with this lens: sample Sigma 24 1.8 #1 [flickr.com] sample sigma 24 1.8 #2 [flickr.com] sample sigma 24 1.8 #3 [flickr.com] All the people saying that Pentax doesn't have the lens selection to do a great job I just don't understand how they can say this. From 8mm to 500mm, there are excellent lenses to choose from. Take a look at the lens data base on PentaxForums, and you'll see hundreds of lenses that are available, all with reviews and ratings on things like sharpness, chromatic aberation, build quality and rendering. http://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/ It's an awesome resource that is unique to Pentax. A forum with great honest reviews that has members that are smart, friendly and talented. Don't underestimate this... it is a huge added value to be able to learn from supportive and informed individuals. |
|
|
Pentax K5 -- $850 Pentax DA 35 2.4 $190 Pentax DA 18-55 wr - $200 new, $150 used Pentax DA 55-300 - $360 new, $300 used Sigma 8-16 rectilinear - $700 Pentax DA 50 1.8 (available in about a month) $250 $2550 new If I went used, I'd add a used af360 flash for around $150 on Pentax Forums. That would be a pretty versatile kit with some excellent glass that is only lacking on the Macro side of things. Get yourself a Raynox 150 for $80 and then now you have some close focusing options. And all this would weigh pounds less than a comparable kit by Nikon or Canon and could all be carried on a vacation or a hike much more comfortably in a bag like a Slingshot 200 (which is my primary travel bag). In a Nikon or Canon kit with this bag, I bet you have to leave some lenses behind. Which means your pictures from a once in a lifetime visit to a place will be compromised. I prefer to have my lenses with me when I travel - they do me no good if they are too big to fit in my bag and have to be left at home. |
|
|
Just a general note. Out of every camera brand Pentax is the Slickest when it comes to value. Every camera is backwards compatible to a huge selection of 42mm screw mount lenses dating back to the 1960's with a $10 adapter. Pentax includes the "green button" which allows you to set exposure with an old manual lens, and they do this to be nice. Also the Pentax has image stabilization built into the body, so you get excellent image stabilization on 45 year old lenses! Also great high ISO performance. The pentax K-mount has not changed since the 1970's. And lenses from the early 80's are fully compatible with automatic aperture feature. I have about 25 high quality prime lenses such as the f1.4 50mm SMC Takumar. On average I have paid about $15 per lens on Craigslist.
http://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/ |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Nikon D3100 14MP DSLR Camera w/ 18-55mm VR DX Image Stabilization Lens (refurbished) for $430 with free shipping | brisar | Hot Deals | 26 | 04-13-2012 06:37 AM |
| Pentax K5 body only for $934.0 | NTsd | Hot Deals | 7 | 04-01-2012 07:56 PM |
| Pentax K-5 Body only @ 999.89 w/ fs @ amazon.com | hydrocynus | Hot Deals | 11 | 03-20-2012 10:49 AM |
| Canon EOS Rebel T3i DSLR w/ 18-135mm Lens + 16GB Lexar 100x Class 6 SDHC, Slinger Camera Bag, Generic Spare Battery $840 with free shipping | yuugotserved | Hot Deals | 20 | 01-04-2012 08:45 PM |
| Canon EOS Rebel T3i DSLR w/ 18-55mm Lens $789.44 @ Amazon | P0cky | Hot Deals | 21 | 10-19-2011 07:22 PM |