Do you support Rand Paul's budget?

Quote from NM 156 : The Liberty movement is enforcing Rule 38 at the Texas convention as we speak... and as they will at the RNC... Quite delicious...

Yes but rule 3072, section 12, paragraph B clearly counteracts this move rendering it useless.

Quote from TRNT : So effectively do we have one or two remaining candidates for the GOP nomination and if more than one why would rand not endorse his own dad?

Quote from andyfico : Yes but rule 3072, section 12, paragraph B clearly counteracts this move rendering it useless.

Quote from andyfico : You're not reading between the lines! LOL

The title and the transcript says it all...

Quote from NM 156 : Sen. Rand Paul: 'Gov. Romney is right there with us' [foxnews.com] Read between the lines...

Quote from andyfico : Yes but rule 3072, section 12, paragraph B clearly counteracts this move rendering it useless.

There is another rule that supersedes all other.

Rule 156: you may create your imaginary world all around you. And as long as you do not acknowledge the reality, no one else can force you to do it either.

Quote from TRNT : There is another rule that supersedes all other. Rule 156: you may create your imaginary world all around you. And as long as you do not acknowledge the reality, no one else can force you to do it either.

You should stop forcing your imaginary world on everybody else...

Quote : Quote from NM 156 : Read between the lines...

Your mind is what you read.

HarHarHar

Quote from TRNT : Your mind is what you read. HarHarHar

I don't like the idea of a Vice President Romney... but it appears that is the deal that was made...

Another way I see it... This was a pretty smart move on Rand's part... After all the media has done in order to make it look like Mitt Romney has already won, if Ron Paul were to win right now they would go on and make it look like Ron Paul stole Mitt Romney's victory, or cheated him out of it... This way they now make it look like they weren't expecting the win and they show that they weren't completely against Mitt Romney so they won't completely disenfranchise Mitt's supporters... How few of them there are in reality anyway...

Even if Romney were to steal the nomination... Ron Paul supporters would never vote for Mitt Romney... They would either stay home or write in Ron Paul... Mitt Romney would be dead in the water... Letting Romney get the nomination would guarantee Obama a re-election... If the Republicans want Obama out of office, thier only choice is Ron Paul.

Quote from TRNT : Wow! Playing dumb is unbecoming. Selective amnesia much? You forwarded an article that said you have to be here within so many months of giving birth or our child is not an American.

I guess selective amnesia for things people don't clarify and that are unimportant.

I gave such a thing a mention, and when asked about it, and after giving qualifiers about it, I posted the first link that came up in a google search after certain people/persons act like laws about residency don't exist at all.

That along with the following, mind you:

Quote from Deusxmachina : I'd have to look it up again for specifics since this Obama birth stuff really isn't a big issue with me

Quote from 124nic8 : Why wouldn't a natural US born woman qualify as a US citizen?

Quote from Deusxmachina : Beats me. Like I said, I didn't look into that much because I don't really care,

Quote from Deusxmachina : And I also put qualifiers on that statement you quoted, but you edited them out.

And then what happened? You, who asks for cites asks for cites asks for cites even after I cite congressmen and The Supreme Court, whose main argument for "natural-born" is the 14th Amendment, and when I ask where in the 14th Amendment it even says "natural-born," you tell me to do my own searches. And instead of providing actual data to counter the arguments for the huge amount of the rest of the evidence I posted, I get strange comments later like:

TRNT: "But what is even more interesting is that you are still clinging to this."
I never clung to it in the first place!

And your infamous "You even did the math for us and sounded giddy doing it."
which I asked you half a dozen times what "math and sounding giddy" you were talking about and you ignored every question about it even though it is a direct accusation about me made by you. I won't even ask you again about it here because you'll just ignore it again anyway.

And now here you are again, throwing out blatant and direct accusations at Paul supporters that from what I can tell has little to no place in an internet search. And you back that up with linking it to a poster on here who apparently doesn't exist.

Quote from Deusxmachina : I guess selective amnesia for things people don't clarify and that are unimportant. I gave such a thing a mention, and when asked about it, and after giving qualifiers about it, I posted the first link that came up in a google search after certain people/persons act like laws about residency don't exist at all. That along with the following, mind you: And then what happened? You, who asks for cites asks for cites asks for cites even after I cite congressmen and The Supreme Court, whose main argument for "natural-born" is the 14th Amendment, and when I ask where in the 14th Amendment it even says "natural-born," you tell me to do my own searches. And instead of providing actual data to counter the arguments for the huge amount of the rest of the evidence I posted, I get strange comments later like: TRNT: "But what is even more interesting is that you are still clinging to this." I never clung to it in the first place! And your infamous "You even did the math for us and sounded giddy doing it." which I asked you half a dozen times what "math and sounding giddy" you were talking about and you ignored every question about it even though it is a direct accusation about me made by you. I won't even ask you again about it here because you'll just ignore it again anyway. And now here you are again, throwing out blatant and direct accusations at Paul supporters that from what I can tell has little to no place in an internet search. And you back that up with linking it to a poster on here who apparently doesn't exist.

It is unbeliveable that someone who has constantly expressed doubt about obama being a natural born citizen forwards an article that argues that unsubstantiated claim but with totally erroneous arguments and inapplicable law and when questioned the poster immediately walks away from the article.

Simply unbelieveable.

Re 14th amendment: we have been over this several times. The language of the amendment does not support your claim. Then you bring these other quotes from individuals. None of those would convince me. Good luck convincing others. And when you convince enough people you can form your own group. I even have a name for the group.....how about birthers?

Quote from NM 156 : Another way I see it... This was a pretty smart move on Rand's part... After all the media has done in order to make it look like Mitt Romney has already won, if Ron Paul were to win right now they would go on and make it look like Ron Paul stole Mitt Romney's victory, or cheated him out of it... This way they now make it look like they weren't expecting the win and they show that they weren't completely against Mitt Romney so they won't completely disenfranchise Mitt's supporters... How few of them there are in reality anyway... Even if Romney were to steal the nomination... Ron Paul supporters would never vote for Mitt Romney... They would either stay home or write in Ron Paul... Mitt Romney would be dead in the water... Letting Romney get the nomination would guarantee Obama a re-election... If the Republicans want Obama out of office, thier only choice is Ron Paul.

What are your thoughts on this? [lewrockwell.com]

Quote from Danman114 : What are your thoughts on this? [lewrockwell.com]

Saw it already...

Lew Rockwell: Ron Paul and Rand Paul are different [youtube.com]

Quote from TRNT : It is unbeliveable that someone who has constantly expressed doubt about obama being a natural born citizen forwards an article that argues that unsubstantiated claim but with totally erroneous arguments and inapplicable law and when questioned the poster immediately walks away from the article.

I only forwarded that "unsubstantiated article" because it was the first search hit and it looked like some people were too lazy to do a 10-second internet search on the popular topic as it pertains to Obama.

I said it before, I'll say it again...
I have The Supreme Court agreeing with me. What do you have?

Rhetorical question. Don't bother answering. Just like you don't bother answering where I did math and was all giddy about it.

Quote from TRNT : Re 14th amendment: we have been over this several times. The language of the amendment does not support your claim.

lol, it doesn't have to support my claim. I have plenty of stuff to support my claim. You were using it to support YOUR claim.

"Where in the 14th does it even say 'natural-born?'"
"Do your own searches."
nice!

Where were we again? Oh, right. Rand Paul and budgets.

Quote from Deusxmachina : I said it before, I'll say it again... I have The Supreme Court agreeing with me. What do you have?

interested to hear your answer to this trnt...