|
|||||||
|
You seem to be disagreeing simply to disagree, in a kneejerk way. Even Milton Friedman, long an advocate of low, flat taxes and no income redistribution, claimed that the free markets would lead to reduced income inequality, but in the last few years of his life, he admitted there was no evidence it was happening. |
|
| 07-05-2012, 02:23 PM | |
|
|
|
|
||
|
The New York metro is also at the top of income inequality list. Who do you think pays bloomberg's cigarette tax? New Jersey's commuter tax? New York's sales tax? New Jersey's $8,000 property tax? Port Authority's $12 toll? Vehicle registration fees, fines? Who do you think pays higher rents due to rent control, and has to pay more for a home due to environmentalist nonsense and zoning restrictions? You surely know that Wall Street contributes a mere 7% of NYC's tax revenue? Who do you think pays the other 93%, exactly? Hint: Derek Jeter lives in Florida. He's not paying the city for his endorsement income.
Last edited by Krazen1211; 07-05-2012 at 08:35 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
||
|
Here we have someone who is saying the tax system is such that it gives a pass to the super rich and puts most of the burden on the middle class. So I say......we agree. Let's shift the burden of taxes from the middle class to the super rich. |
|
|
Well, that's nice talk, I guess. But your party doesn't act that way. |
|
|
Essentially, you are cementing a class of people above society as 'super rich', and you are preventing movement upwards among the lower classes. |
|
|
Just shocking. |
|
|
That's what the liberals are and do. They care about their base 1% of hollywood donors and the voters that they provide handouts to. Who requires upward movement of the lower classes; they'd rather tax the crap out of those lower classes to provide the handouts. |
|
|
When some call for increased taxes on sugar, soft drinks, ammo, etc., what is the desired and assumed effect of increasing such taxes? Why would you think that increasing taxes on capital investment would work any differently? Hate to break it to you but the very rich don't have to invest their money. And if they chose to, there are many ways to do so that involve little risk, result in minimal if any taxable capital gains, and they'll STILL make a bunch of money. But there will be less incentive to go to those investments at higher risk that do result in cap gains. It's a fairly simple financial equation. As an investor, I'm looking at the net cost, net return, timing, and risk. If I have greater costs/risk/longer payback, I'm just going to factor that into the basis for the cost to provide that capital. So when some city or company wants to sell bonds to pay for that new school, library, hospital, bike path, etc., it's just going to cost them more. Which, at least in the case of public funding, in turn will just be passed back to the taxpayer again in the form of higher taxes to support the payments to investors. |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GOP may OK tax increase that Obama hopes to block | TRNT | The Podium | 47 | 08-24-2011 09:38 PM |
| Reports: Obama pushing for cuts to Social Security, Medicare | MadisonAlexa | The Podium | 76 | 07-11-2011 07:42 PM |
| Pawlenty proposes deep cuts in federal spending, tax rates | 808Lurker | The Podium | 145 | 06-14-2011 03:28 PM |
| The $250k tax is dead....Democrats alter plan on Bush tax cuts | Krazen1211 | The Podium | 180 | 11-12-2010 02:49 PM |
| Rich Americans Save Tax Cuts Instead of Spending | 808Lurker | The Podium | 163 | 09-28-2010 07:10 AM |