Stocks Might Be 50% Lower Without Fed

Pffft, and you would conclude incorrectly there Mr Kelly. The market knows more than the Fed ever will and it doesn't answer to some raccoon-eyed quiver-liped imp.

Having said that, as long as the "Bernanke put" keeps tantalizing those 010010's in the HFT dark pools, then it's "risk on."

But in the end, you can't make chicken salad out of chicken shit and the red candle bazaar will be epic.

Insert silly useless day trader slang here implying that I know what's going on.

Quote from vaultaddict : Insert silly useless day trader slang here implying that I know what's going on.

Speaking of useless. But hey, this is certainly an improvement over 90% of your posts. See, you're getting better. Yay!

Will equities continue to perform as long as Ben is in the market with some form of QE? Of course. Will corporations take the massive hoard of cash they're sitting on and dump it into stocks? Will PE's continue to grow when they're already grossly distorted from historical mean? Will the market scream to all time highs on another massive bong hit of hopium that there will be no global recession, that manufacturing, job growth and social climate abroad all take a massive u-turn and happy days have returned forever and ever!?

Guess y'alls are going to have to tune in to CNBC to find out! FYI, their viewership and ratings are slipping faster than a chunky stripper down a greasy poll. I'm sure every click on the article is doing wonders for them.

I need a translation: One maybe two sentences max, please?

Quote from 1stbuy : I need a translation: One maybe two sentences max, please?

1) The Fed causes stock price inflation.
2) "To outperform the market, trade the trend 24 hours before a Fed meeting." I think a lot of people who watch stocks in real-time during a Fed meeting may have something different to say about that, but ymmv.

Quote from 1stbuy : I need a translation: One maybe two sentences max, please?

http://libertystreeteconomics.new...drift.html

Not to be a dick, but to understand you'll have to read it. No one is going to spoon feed you.

Just in my trading experience: "If you want to lose, read the news." I'm just an amateur hack, but I do know better than to try to trade the headlines as you'll just get torn up. There is the "buy the rumor, sell the news" theory but you have to be well-disciplined if that's your game plan.

Quote from barnz008 : http://libertystreeteconomics.new...drift.html Not to be a dick, but to understand you'll have to read it. No one is going to spoon feed you. Just in my trading experience: "If you want to lose, read the news." I'm just an amateur hack, but I do know better than to try to trade the headlines as you'll just get torn up. There is the "buy the rumor, sell the news" theory but you have to be well-disciplined if that's your game plan.

Read?!

I don't like green eggs and ham. (<-- My generous contribution to your book of meaningless phrases.)

Quote from vaultaddict : Insert silly useless day trader slang here implying that I know what's going on.

isn't it time you changed your name to FinanceAddict? SD forum Vault is so 2011.

CNBC is nothing but a circus with loud, annoying ppl. It feels like The View with money talk instead of annoying popular topic talk. Fox Biz is even worse with lou dobbs, gerry and other cnn rejects. Bloomberg i can't say much yet.

Quote from Superocean : isn't it time you changed your name to FinanceAddict? SD forum Vault is so 2011. CNBC is nothing but a circus with loud, annoying ppl. It feels like The View with money talk instead of annoying popular topic talk. Fox Biz is even worse with lou dobbs, gerry and other cnn rejects. Bloomberg i can't say much yet.

I just do the opposite of what Jim Cramer says, been doing pretty well because of it

On a more serious note, there is a lot of ridiculous stuff on CNBC, so I just focus on what the guests say. Even then, the guests make ridiculous comments as well. Once you weed out all the fluff, there are some good insightful information.

Quote from SP33DFR34K : I just do the opposite of what Jim Cramer says, been doing pretty well because of it On a more serious note, there is a lot of ridiculous stuff on CNBC, so I just focus on what the guests say. Even then, the guests make ridiculous comments as well. Once you weed out all the fluff, there are some good insightful information.

Yeah the guest are great but yes they need to do a better job of weeding out idiots who are there to spew marketing speak/ bs to pump their position. I guess they just had Buffet on and Spitzer or someone just gave Maria B some difficult time. Too lazy to turn it on but according to my most reliable source (twitter) she just got pwnd or something.

Last time I watched CNBC, Martha MacCallum was one of the the hosts.

Now it's Capital Account on RT on my iPhone a few times per week. I follow the "talent."

Well the Fed DOES give false signals in the market when the market should be liquidating in a true "free" market... interest rates anyone?

When the market does catch on, nothing the Fed does will matter XD