Poverty Levels on the rise

Quote from 124nic8 : Cherry picking FTL! Did you miss this? Or intentionally misrepresenting? And this guy is calling extension of the Bush tax cuts another tax cut when it's really just blocking a tax increase temporarily. As I said, Obama's tax cuts are temporary and strategic; not as harmful as Bush's and Reagan's. Seems you're one of the few who is ignorant of the Reagan Revolution. http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rc...Nzt3iCV7tw http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rc...0Kk3pxbilw http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rc...XnED50mHmw http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rc...EbTLqRu_2Q http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rc...y42iHDWqRw Google it and you can fill in your knowledge gaps.

Bush was President for 8 years. Obama has been President for 3.5. It would be natural for President Bush to sign into law more tax cuts; what is interesting is that Obama has nearly equaled that in 1 term.

You have a bizarre definition of the words 'temporary' and 'permanent', given history. Especially given that no dictionary would define 10 years as 'permanent'. History shows that tax rates have changed over 20 times in the past century by these alleged 'permanent' tax cuts.




Oh, I've heard the term Reagan Revolution before. What is nonsensical is your usage of the term to attribute your party's policies to this 'Reagan revolution' merely because you don't like them. But that's natural for a blind partisan who uses the term 'Bush tax cuts' to refer to tax cuts not signed or voted on by George W. Bush. It is beyond dispute, even by the Obama campaign, that he signed legislation in 2010 reducing tax rates.