|
|||||||
|
Kaspersky
The polls were not skewed, biased, oversampled or wrong. I was. There was no wave, no landslide, I was wrong about that too. Nate Silver is the gold standard of polling analysis.
![]() |
|
| 07-24-2012, 05:12 PM | |
|
|
|
Microsoft spies on you [networkworld.com] George W. Bush (a.k.a. Obama) spies on you [networkworld.com] With a single documented case of spying by Kaspersky his sales would go down the toilet |
|
|
Kaspersky reacts to the article: http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2...rsky-indy/
|
|
Kaspersky went in the crapper, too many false positives and no way to control the over-ride to allow those false positives to be safe.
I've run everything from Agnitum to Zone Alarm and avast! Free edition is about as good as any shareware I've actually paid for and used. Hell, I've even run AV software NONE of you have probably even heard of, like F-PROT & Eset for instance. The fact that avast! takes themselves not so serious and uses a lower case "a" to name their product appeals to a certain side of me as well. They don't rely on bold claims & screaming ALL-CAP namebranding, they let their product do the talking for them. This may sound like a tinfoil hat conspiracy theory but I firmly believe many, if not most, viruses are set loose in the world - in some black op way - by the very people selling AV products, just to keep the cash cow milking. The recent arrest of a former Russian AV coder for doing just that, only serves to reconfirm my suspicions. Kaspersky himself is a polarizing figure who is at present the head of biggest AV company in the world and a strong advocate of totalitarian-extremism in controlling the internet. "Too many bad guys out there", he says. Not very surprising, given his very close ties to the Russian FSB, (former KGB's successor.) Last edited by Anonymouse; 07-31-2012 at 04:39 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
It's unclear where anybody ever got the idea that a free market results in low prices when the entire point of capitalism is to maximize profit and low prices are less profitable. Therefore the natural proclivity should be to collude and fix prices at the highest sustainable point.
Oh, it's illegal to collude and fix prices and whatnot as deemed by the gubmint? Who are they to say how a free market should work when it's a matter of divinity per Adam Smith whose book nobody bothered to read? |
|
|
Romney sometimes is wrong with his foreign policy assessments but he was probably right about Russia. |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|