Contemporary bar stools 2 for $59.99,or $49.99 w/ coupon FS

I got these from walmart about 4 years ago when I bought my first house. There no lazy boys, but there not uncomfortable. Everyone that has come to my house just falls in love them. They think there so cool looking.

Ordered 2 pairs for our kitchen. Great deal considering 2 for $50, so $25. Saw them at local store for $50 for one. Wish the wood seat was available. But these will do. Thanks Op.

I hope this price/stock lasts a few days, still waiting to sign off on my apartment! These will be great for the kitchen counter since I don't plan on getting a dining table in the near future..

Thanks, OP. Grabbed a pair.

Quote from jaybme : I hope this price/stock lasts a few days, still waiting to sign off on my apartment! These will be great for the kitchen counter since I don't plan on getting a dining table in the near future..

same here.. just signed off on a condo but im waiting for the wife to come home so she can pick out the color. i may just pull the trigger on the red ones though.

I bought these about 6 months ago and one of them broke. I'm 6'3 and about 200 lbs and I think it broke when I sat on it.

In for the black pair. i need that table in the pic too!

Quote from vanrigt : I bought these about 6 months ago and one of them broke. I'm 6'3 and about 200 lbs and I think it broke when I sat on it.

In what way did it broke? I'm guessing it was the airlift and it no longer stays up. If the weight limit is in fact 200 lbs on the dot and you're below it bear in mind that if you hopped down on it you placed additional lbs in force like the jump in reading on a weight scale.

Quote from leecm : I understand your point, but at the same time, I think you underestimate how easy it is for someone that's not fat at all to be over 200lbs just by being at least 6ft tall and working out. Heck, you don't even have to be 6ft tall, and you can hit 200 lbs just by being muscular. 200lbs is really not that much. Now, if we were talking 250lbs, I'd be with you on this 100%.

Sorry, but I know quite a lot of people at around 6' (5'10 - 6'3) and if you are working out you should not be at 200lbs. Hell even on bulking diets, they don't get to 200lbs. If they are cut, they should be around 150 - 160 (that's not even that cut, mind you). If you are hitting 200lbs, you might be muscular, but you are definitely packing on some major pounds with lots of fat.

In any case, I do agree that you cannot control the weight of people who come over, but at the same time, don't just be quiet and let them break your stuff!

Quote from Danadcorps : Sorry, but I know quite a lot of people at around 6' (5'10 - 6'3) and if you are working out you should not be at 200lbs. Hell even on bulking diets, they don't get to 200lbs. If they are cut, they should be around 150 - 160 (that's not even that cut, mind you). If you are hitting 200lbs, you might be muscular, but you are definitely packing on some major pounds with lots of fat. In any case, I do agree that you cannot control the weight of people who come over, but at the same time, don't just be quiet and let them break your stuff!

Really?? 6'3" (or even 5'10) with muscle and if they're 160lbs they aren't cut? Are you serious?? That's just not accurate.

Quote from leecm : Really?? 6'3" (or even 5'10) with muscle and if they're 160lbs they aren't cut? Are you serious?? That's just not accurate.

Actually it is. He is 5'11" at 145. He's definitely defined, but not super cut. I am 5'6" at 145, and I would classify myself as defined, but not cut as well (I'm dropping to 135-ish by mid September so that I will be cut). Then again, my definition of defined and cut could be totally different than yours. Not only that, but genetics play a major part in determining how "cut" one can look at different weights. As I said before, I'm sure a 180lb 6'2" dude could "look" defined, but he would definitely still have quite a bit of fat in there (when I was 160, I didn't look fat - I looked muscular, even though I didn't work out for about a year) which is what you kind of want for a bulking diet.

In any case, my stools come today. How comfy are these?

Quote from Danadcorps : Actually it is. He is 5'11" at 145. He's definitely defined, but not super cut. I am 5'6" at 145, and I would classify myself as defined, but not cut as well (I'm dropping to 135-ish by mid September so that I will be cut). Then again, my definition of defined and cut could be totally different than yours. Not only that, but genetics play a major part in determining how "cut" one can look at different weights. As I said before, I'm sure a 180lb 6'2" dude could "look" defined, but he would definitely still have quite a bit of fat in there (when I was 160, I didn't look fat - I looked muscular, even though I didn't work out for about a year) which is what you kind of want for a bulking diet. In any case, my stools come today. How comfy are these?

Sure, you may be defined, but you're 5'11 145, you are definitely NOT muscular. You don't need to look any further than professional fighters to see how much a reasonably muscular person weighs. Nick Diaz would be a fair example because he's not overly muscular and he has very little fat when he comes into a fight in shape. He cuts to make 170lbs, comes into the fight heavier and still looks cut. He's only 6ft and he's pretty skinny. I mean, you could bave a distance runners physique with that height to weight ratio and it would be believable. But then again, you would have to have some not so muscular legs in order to keep your weight that low.
If you lift weights and are truly interested in putting muscle on your entire body, then your legs alone will make you heavy. Yeah, you'll be over 10% body fat but that's a healthy amount of fat to have.