Burger King - buy one Whopper, get one FREE coupon

Quote from slagman5 : Well, you know how people keep complaining that their PC will get really slow after a while and they are "forced" to upgrade and that's why PC's suck? Well, use some logic, the hardware hasn't changed, the PC didn't get slower magically on its own, it's from people installing anything and everything, and even the simplest programs will have crap that will always run in the background on start-up. So what else do you expect when your PC has 1000 things running at the same time??

Anyone know if this coupon printer program starts every time I boot up my computer ?
Or does it just stay resident when I use it ?

Quote from sharki69 : Sometimes there is a price you need to "pay" to get free stuff..... Thanks for the TD...

i give you thumbs up-thank you!

Quote from bigpollack : Anyone know if this coupon printer program starts every time I boot up my computer ? Or does it just stay resident when I use it ?

To make you install a .exe file to get a coupon there must be more to this than meets the eye. I wouldn't install it unless its to a virtual pc you can wipe afterwards.

Quote from Syrinx2112 : Why not? They have far better hamburgers than any other fast food joint except maybe Steak & Shake. Light years better than McDonald's.

You must not eat out much to say that. Five guys burgers are by far the best.

Quote from bigpollack : TU for free clogged arteries.

Someone hasn't been keeping up with their science. Salt and meat/fat are now good for you. Sugar, starch and high calorie heavily processed foods are bad.

Over the past 18 moths, I ate a nearly 50% fat diet, most of it saturated animal fat, lost 80 pounds and went from all bad labs to all good labs. I used to take 17 different pills a day, now I take none.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/03...d=all&_r=0

"While, back then, the evidence merely failed to demonstrate that salt was harmful, the evidence from studies published over the past two years actually suggests that restricting how much salt we eat can increase our likelihood of dying prematurely. Put simply, the possibility has been raised that if we were to eat as little salt as the U.S.D.A. and the C.D.C. recommend, we’d be harming rather than helping ourselves."

http://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.c...rated-fat/

"Why does the A.H.A. continue to insist that saturated fat should be avoided, if these trials repeatedly show that high saturated fat diets lead to better cholesterol profiles than low-saturated fat diets? And how many of these trials have to be done before the National Institutes of Health or some other august institution in this business re-assesses this question? After all, the reason the food guide pyramid suggests we eat things like butter and lard and meats sparingly (and puts them high up in the pyramid) is that they contain saturated fat. This is also the reason that the A.H.A. wants to lower even further what’s considered the safe limit for saturated fats in the diet."

I really like this chart...our current food guidelines are killing us!

http://www.lewrockwell.com/miller...besity.gif

So on a whopper, the bad actors are the white bread bun and the mayo made from gmo industrial seed oils. The good stuff is the meat, cheese, lettuce and tomato. But eating one once or twice a week, as long as you keep your total calorie count low...won't hurt your arteries a bit. Might help them. If you evaluate the nutritional studies like Intersalt and the Lipid Theory, it becomes quickly obvious that these folks had a destination they wanted to arrive at (for whatever reason) and they omitted data and took liberties with the results to get there. Intersalt deleted 40% of the patient data because those people ate a lot of salt and didn't have problems with it, so the study operators presumed they must be lying. The Lipid Theory took 22 countries worth of data and omitted 17, because the data from those 17 were at odds with the conclusion that fat is bad for you. When you finally come to the conclusion that 99% of what you're being told is completely unsupported BS, just eat simple whole foods like we did 100 years ago. If you have to grind it, mill it, cook it for an hour to make it palatable or its mostly eaten by the poor, don't eat it.

Its amazing how satiating a diet of eggs, bacon, sausage, red meat, poultry with crispy skin on it and stuff covered with butter and cooked in lard can be.

Best way is to create a virtual machine and install in there

Quote from megamanny2000 : Me too! I thought they went out of business.. maybe just in nyc

There are lots of BKs all over NYC

Quote from sklar : Someone hasn't been keeping up with their science. Salt and meat/fat are now good for you. Sugar, starch and high calorie heavily processed foods are bad. Over the past 18 moths, I ate a nearly 50% fat diet, most of it saturated animal fat, lost 80 pounds and went from all bad labs to all good labs. I used to take 17 different pills a day, now I take none. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/03...d=all&_r=0 "While, back then, the evidence merely failed to demonstrate that salt was harmful, the evidence from studies published over the past two years actually suggests that restricting how much salt we eat can increase our likelihood of dying prematurely. Put simply, the possibility has been raised that if we were to eat as little salt as the U.S.D.A. and the C.D.C. recommend, we’d be harming rather than helping ourselves." http://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.c...rated-fat/ "Why does the A.H.A. continue to insist that saturated fat should be avoided, if these trials repeatedly show that high saturated fat diets lead to better cholesterol profiles than low-saturated fat diets? And how many of these trials have to be done before the National Institutes of Health or some other august institution in this business re-assesses this question? After all, the reason the food guide pyramid suggests we eat things like butter and lard and meats sparingly (and puts them high up in the pyramid) is that they contain saturated fat. This is also the reason that the A.H.A. wants to lower even further what’s considered the safe limit for saturated fats in the diet." I really like this chart...our current food guidelines are killing us! http://www.lewrockwell.com/miller...besity.gif So on a whopper, the bad actors are the white bread bun and the mayo made from gmo industrial seed oils. The good stuff is the meat, cheese, lettuce and tomato. But eating one once or twice a week, as long as you keep your total calorie count low...won't hurt your arteries a bit. Might help them. If you evaluate the nutritional studies like Intersalt and the Lipid Theory, it becomes quickly obvious that these folks had a destination they wanted to arrive at (for whatever reason) and they omitted data and took liberties with the results to get there. Intersalt deleted 40% of the patient data because those people ate a lot of salt and didn't have problems with it, so the study operators presumed they must be lying. The Lipid Theory took 22 countries worth of data and omitted 17, because the data from those 17 were at odds with the conclusion that fat is bad for you. When you finally come to the conclusion that 99% of what you're being told is completely unsupported BS, just eat simple whole foods like we did 100 years ago. If you have to grind it, mill it, cook it for an hour to make it palatable or its mostly eaten by the poor, don't eat it. Its amazing how satiating a diet of eggs, bacon, sausage, red meat, poultry with crispy skin on it and stuff covered with butter and cooked in lard can be.

I had to go up to 80% of calories from fat before I started having nice weight loss. Also way better nutrition than shitty carbs - you don't need food every 4 hours because fat doesn't spike the hell out of your blood sugar ... low fat dressing should be called 'diabetes dressing"

Once you mix your own salad dressing with organic EVOO and see it costs $.75-1.00 per serving, you'll know why the entire supermarket dressing aisle should just be illegal, nothing in there more than $4, and nothing healthy could be produced for less than $7~10 a bottle

Print coupon, run Revo Uninstaller, 30 seconds later I have the coupon and the software is gone.....kind of surprised there were only (2) registry changes from the install.

Quote from malik999 : To make you install a .exe file to get a coupon there must be more to this than meets the eye. I wouldn't install it unless its to a virtual pc you can wipe afterwards.

I agree. It seems fishy to me. Sorta like these "free" websites that want your credit card info in order to join.

I ran the program on a Virtual PC as well, didn't seem to really change much. Printed my coupons and wiped it regardless.

Being a Slick dealer means I find these deals frequently. I have tried the "print then uninstall" method once or twice. Then I realized it is nice to be able to get these type of coupons whenever they come up, and also that they let you print two. If it was for one deal that would be different. This does not run in the background or at startup. I have given out personal info which invites spam so often this is no where near as intrusive. Thank you OP.

Edit...Speaking of which- just got this deal:http://slickdeals.net/f/5734234-R...-2-Gallons

I installed and Revo removed. I agree with others' statements regarding installing crapware. It leads to bloat at the least and malware/viruses at the worst. But hunger overruled reason today...

Emergency rooms across the country are getting "Christmas Bonuses" with this deal!