|
|||||||
|
|
|
| 01-08-2013, 06:41 AM | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I picked this TV up a few weeks ago when it was on sale from Walmart for $840. It's a great TV with no glare in my room and the only thing missing is the "smart" apps but who cares. Just plug in your PS3/Xbox/Roku and you don't need the TV to be "smart". The next time I buy a tv the smart features and skype built in should be much cheaper I imagine.
The 4 free glasses are trash but do actually fit over my eye glasses and the 3d looks great. The convert 2d -> 3d is functional but I haven't done enough with it to look great. |
|
With respect to "Smart TVs", I currently don't have cable/satellite - I use an antenna (sorry, is that a bad word?). So we hook up the laptop a lot and watch episodes of some shows from various sites (including You Tube, Hulu, and some of the station websites like ABC, CBS, etc).
So I guess I would like a TV that's capable of letting you view a webpage and play a video, and not one that just has apps for Netflix, etc. Are Smart TVs that have a browser capable of this, or do they not have Flash, or other needed software, installed? Just curious what peoples' thoughts are. |
|
yes, but. . .
Now this is my opinion so . . . I've never been happy with the interpretation of the television CE industry ability implement these features in a way that makes sense or is easy to use. I'd much rather have a standard HDTV and use a third party set top box running preferably XBMC. I just figure on a large investment that's the best way to ensure your able to update the services and use the content providing device in the most effective way. |
|
|
I know it's smaller, but what are peoples thoughts on this Vizio LED 3D Smart TV?
55" is too big for the room I'm looking at and am really thinking at jumping on this one... http://www.amazon.com/VIZIO-E3D47...+47%22+led |
|
For those with the complaints of the LG not being a "Smart TV"....this Vizio could be another option for less than $100 more.
http://www.walmart.com/catalog/pr...gMethod=rr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It looks a bit thicker than what I would hope for in a 60" set, let alone a 47". I really need a TV, but I find 3D completely unnecessary. That extra $150 or so for the cost of 3D would be better spent on smart features, a better picture, or more component inputs. From walking around Costco and Bestbuy, I've come to the conclusion that 60" is the best size for my living room, where I normally sit 7 ft. away. Being nearsighted, when watching a news channel or a sporting event, that's the best size to clearly see all the graphics being transmitted. Last edited by hilaryshotlips; 01-08-2013 at 11:08 AM.. |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Samsung UN46EH6030 46-Inch 1080p 120Hz LED 3D HDTV (Black) - $ 650 + Free Shipping - ABT.COM ( $585 with Discover) | sisasa | Hot Deals | 24 | 11-28-2012 12:02 PM |
| LG 42" LED 3D 120Hz 1080p TV $580 at bestbuy | rogueone | Hot Deals | 30 | 11-19-2012 08:22 AM |
| Sony Bravia 46" 3D 1080P 120HZ LED HDTV-KDL46EX720 - 799.99 @HHGregg - B&M (12/22-12/24) | ssvp | Hot Deals | 9 | 12-22-2011 01:34 PM |
| Samsung 55" Ultra Thin LED 3D HDTV UN55D6400 1080p 120Hz 4x HDMI Smart TV $1349 AC + SH | Russo69 | Hot Deals | 7 | 12-13-2011 06:48 AM |
| Panasonic VIERA 42-Inch 1080p 120Hz LED Smart HDTV $549.99 | spinteews | Hot Deals | 1 | 10-21-2011 02:12 AM |