|
|||||||
|
I "bypassed Apple's checks" and "installed a newer OS?" I purchased my software from Apple and installed it. The end. My point was actually that my OS is several versions out of date, but still maintains all current security updates, runs the most recent version of Firefox, and has no problem accessing Hotmail or any other godawful email service. The fact that you think that installing Snow Leopard on a Macbook would be "bypassing Apple's checks" proves that you have no idea what you are doing and should probably avoid providing your "expertise" to your neighbors. If you can't figure out how to get this person's computer running with the latest version of Firefox, then either her computer is an ancient relic (pre-2005 I would imagine) or you're not qualified to operate a computer. Lastly, your line of "the majority of Mac users do not understand how and can not help themselves." applies to Windows users as well. It's called the general population. |
|
| 02-17-2013, 06:16 PM | |
|
|
|
2. Email it to me jk lolol http://www.apple.com/support/applecare/register/ |
|
|
Several browsers were tested (safari, mozilla, etc) and all suffered from the same issue - whatever specific web functionality it was, it required new macosx updates/drivers. The problem was researched in depth and multiple sources confirmed the issue - so the only option (based on my neighbors wish to remain on mac and not possibly void any warranty) was to change email service, and not bypass apple limits on installing a newer osx. It is unfortunate that helping others and looking out for their best interest, without asking for anything in return (payment or otherwise), makes you feel bad. Your ailment will be in the thoughts and prayers, courtesy of the SD 'Freebies' group.
Yep... Words is difficult. This might be a familiar scene to you, if you've ever picked something up with the intent to read (ie: in books/newspapers/magazines - literary media - or 'walls of text,' as you so cleverly put.) I'll be the first to notify you, once SD decides to undergo the transformation to graphics only (you might better recall hearing of this novel concept as 'picture book'). Good god - it's capable of thought! "either her computer is an ancient relic (pre-2005 I would imagine) or you're not qualified to operate a computer." The computer is in fact old, yet still capable of running newer software, aside from apples hardware locked osx - though it's possible to bypass. It is funny that you assume my neighbor is a woman, however - it would have to be a typical apple user though, a middle aged woman with no technical expertise or sensibility and deep pockets ![]() I am curious on the qualifications you consider essential in order to be able to operate a computer, however - apparently, they would have to be exceedingly minimal no non-existent. Last edited by yearofdeath; 02-18-2013 at 06:17 AM.. |
||
|
what? I get a box mailed to me... shoot I better order asap good thing I can still register as long I place the order while still under warranty.
Thanks Jason, rep ya ![]()
|
|
|
not sure if i should buy extended apple care or just sell my 2012 mac air and upgrade? the money it costs for apple care is about the same as the money i would lose by selling it used so I would rather take the loss and upgrade (always newest gen, 1 year warranty)
|
|
I never said nor implied windows users were smarter than Mac users... whatever bias or issues you have are your own. You might care to actually read into apples terms of service, specifically on their software manipulation - ask someone you know who can read and understand this legalese - very useful to know. I have a feeling that you are capable of doing your own 'research' here, but you might want to look into it for yourself. What you think I did is actually not even close - his machine was simply 'not supported'. Ill try to get his Mac ID the next time I see him so you can go ahead and argue with apple support and convince them otherwise. Who knows you might be right - in which case apple support is either incapable or dishonest. I do find it interesting how you go about listing your credentials, however... Setting up networks and personally crimping cables, all by yourself... Repairing and completely disassembling and reassembling numerous laptops, macbooks and ultrabooks... that you P2P and torrent copyrighted software like every other butt-wipe out there... utilizing Backtrack, etc. It might surprise you to know that you aren't special.. or exceptionally intelligent... Somewhat of an ass-wipe, maybe ![]() You sound like a fairly competent individual, though - maybe you could work at apple tech support one day and give customers some much needed info (if you don't already) - apple support sure as hell isn't. It sounds as though you might have an idea of and/or experience in the field, in which case, you already know better than to not waste your time
Last edited by yearofdeath; 02-18-2013 at 07:23 AM.. |
|
|
You appear to be back-pedaling. I am not a cruel man; if you want to change your position, that's fine. But let's be clear that your position was: Mac owners are stupid.
I see nothing that is not standard here. Software manipulation voiding a warranty is very standard: when you flash an Android phone with a custom ROM, you void the warranty. (Note I did not say rooting the phone, as that has been deemed legal.) This is cookie cutter language. And Apple doesn't even say it voids the warranty: it just says "the warranty does not cover 3rd-party software or software that uses the device in an 'unintended' way." As a contrast, look at Microsoft's warranting of its software: namely, it does not offer one for OEM products. If your computer's software breaks for ANY reason, it's your issue, and computer manufacturers (like Dell, HP, and Lenovo) specifically DISCLAIM software warranty in their hardware warranties. So if you mess up your software for ANY reason, not just "software modification", you don't even have a warranty to void. So your issue is that Apple offers a warranty at all? Or what?
Leopard (OSX 10.5, r. Q4 2007) was the last PPC-compatible OS. Leopard is important because it was released AFTER all PPC Macs stopped being sold. So if we assume your neighbor had a PPC Mac (and not an Intel one), there is no way that your neighbor had Leopard installed when he purchased his machine, meaning that (unless he upgraded it himself) he had a clear upgrade path to a new OS. I used Leopard for years, and nearly all OSX software states that "it is compatible with OSX 10.5 and beyond." However, this will not be the case much longer, as both Microsoft and Apple are moving to 64-bit OSes. (Windows 8 and Mountain Lion are both 64-bit only.) Your stipulation is that "Apple support" told you it was "not supported." I find this very hard to believe, but you're not giving us all of the information. The Mac ID, the current OS, and the issue he was having all play into this. If he has an Intel Mac, it's AT LEAST supported through Snow Leopard. If he has a PPC Mac, it is supported through Leopard. If you asked if his Mac was supported in Mountain Lion and they said "no", they were telling you the truth. But that doesn't mean there wasn't AN option available to him. Should Apple have offered that? Probably. But when was the last time any computer retailer held your hand properly? They want to push new machines. It sucks.
Does it make me an asswipe to flaunt my intelligence? According to universally accepted standards of polite conversation, absolutely. But I was not flaunting my intelligence in my last post; I was establishing credibility. I have worked with technology for more than 15 years. I have worked with a variety of machines. Apple machines are well-made, expensive, and difficult to repair, but so are ANY machines that target the same engineering goals. My listing of software-that-I-use was to show that I use all three major OSes because each have their advantages. Your post was directly attacking the Mac ecosystem, and I was providing proof that I am suitably experienced in all three OSes to say that your claims are invalid. You can choose to reject my credentials; I don't much care. I was taught to always support my arguments with evidence, even if it is anecdotal.
Where it is unique is in its convenience and customer service, which is why I purchase extended warranties for most of my Apple devices. It saves me the headache of performing repairs or troubleshooting basic issues, since my entire family calls me whenever there's a problem with anything remotely technological. My entire point, through both of these posts, is:
And I believe I've demonstrated both. If you disagree, respond; this is more interesting than the RFI I have to finish. Last edited by spectheintro; 02-18-2013 at 08:39 AM.. |
||||||
|
Case in point: I have an HP machine I purchased for my father in 2007-8, and the only drivers HP provides are for Windows Vista. Not XP and not 7. I managed to get XP running on it through some driver acrobatics, and *technically* I can use most Vista drivers in 7, but the fact is that none of it is officially supported. Apple, in general, is much easier when it comes to this: if you have an Intel Mac, you're golden through Snow Leopard. If you have a 64-bit Intel Mac, you're solid through Mountain Lion. You never need to download any drivers for your core system; it's just covered. |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NEW Apple MacBook Pro 13" Retina Display 2.5GHz Core i5 8GB 128GB SSD $1349 Free Shipping | jontech | Hot Deals | 13 | 02-19-2013 12:53 PM |
| $949 Macbook Pro 13" + price match how to | an88 | Hot Deals | 6 | 11-28-2012 03:41 PM |
| Macbook Pro 13.3" Intel i5 2.5 Ghz 4GB 500GB HD $999 at Fry's Electronics B&M Aug. 17 - 23, 2012 | BruceOC | Hot Deals | 20 | 08-31-2012 07:54 AM |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13" 2012 2.5GHz i5 4GB RAM 500GB HD $999 + tax for Students ONLY AC at Best Buy | vagreasedeals | Hot Deals | 20 | 08-28-2012 12:49 PM |
| MacBook Pro 13.3" 2.3GHz Core i5 - $999 + Free Software + 62% Off AppleCare + More! | itbedave | Hot Deals | 114 | 12-15-2011 04:49 PM |