The hottest deals voted on by our community.
Selected and verified by our team of deal editors.
These deals are currently popular in the
community based on votes and comments.
Low prices and coupons for
The deals and coupons you see on Slickdeals are
contributed by our community. It's what makes
us different. Do you have a great deal to share
with the Slickdeals community?
Track a product from one of our supported stores
and get notified when there is a price drop. You also
have access to graphs of recent price history.
Slickdeals is the leading and most trusted online
community dedicated to sharing, rating,
and reviewing deals and coupons.
See the latest posts, threads, and ratings
as they happen with Slickdeals Live.
If you don't have Amazon Prime you can use
our Amazon Fillers tool to make sure your
cart qualifies for free shipping.
Find us, friend us, and connect with us across the web.
You last visited: Today at 11:39 AM
|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|03-31-2013 10:41 AM|
I own the Nikon, and a Sigma 50 f/1.4. I think at this price vs $200 for the Nikon, I'd get the Sigma.
Reviews saying the Nikon is better were factoring the Sigma at $450, not $269.
|03-30-2013 12:49 AM|
Or maybe they just realize that at f/1.4, when you're obviously going for as little depth of field as possible anyway, who cares what the borders look like when they aren't even supposed to be in focus for your shot? Plus, the bokeh beats the pants off of any of Nikon's comparable offerings.
|03-29-2013 10:32 PM|
|03-29-2013 06:50 PM|
Sorry if it seemed like i was attacking you but im actually trying to find an alternative to this lens. I don't want to purchase a crop sensor only lens.
|03-29-2013 05:42 PM|
This lens is pretty darn good at F1.4 in the center of the frame. Yes, there are focus accuracy problems but the image quality of this lens is nothing short of amazing @ $269.
The Nikon 35/1.8 will focus better & perhaps even have better build quality but the bokeh of the Sigma is MUCH nicer.
|03-29-2013 04:49 PM|
I'm not trying to argue, it's just the decision I made for myself. I will save the money. If people think they want this lens, go for it!
|03-29-2013 04:39 PM|
|03-29-2013 04:15 PM|
|biggiep||Considering how the demand among Nikon owners is so low for this lens (to the point where it has been discounted $50 more than the Canon version), I don't know if I should be jealous as a Canon owner of better crop-sensor prime lenses for the Nikon mount.|
|03-29-2013 03:23 PM|
|89titanium||I am just better off getting the 35mm 1.8 by Nikon? How often will I need the extra aperture, or the extra 5mm? It's cheaper, and it seems Nikon lenses will give slightly better image quality.|
|03-29-2013 03:03 PM|
|03-29-2013 02:46 PM|
|michi098||The new lens is a lot better but also a lot more expensive. On the other hand, looking at some online reviews, this lens isn't very sharp wide open which is the only reason I would get it for. Was kind of tempted, but I think I'll skip. Thanks for the heads up though OP.|
|03-29-2013 02:37 PM|
This deal is good but be aware of new pricing due to updated version coming out.
|03-29-2013 02:28 PM|
|03-29-2013 02:10 PM|
And they are on sale because new version is coming out.
If you want it get it. If you can buy better more expensive version then wait.
|03-29-2013 10:59 AM|
|This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|