You last visited: Today at 05:07 PM
|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|11-19-2012 03:08 PM|
|11-13-2012 04:18 PM|
|cwing||My order took forever to ship and arrive. I didn't get the drive until the 12th so I couldn't send in the rebate in time. :/|
|11-06-2012 11:42 AM|
|doema||anyone get a confirmation that their rebate has been received? i sent mine in about 2 weeks ago and so far nada.|
|10-17-2012 05:36 PM|
|10-16-2012 02:25 PM|
FYI, mine came with screws, a molex to SATA power cable, a SATA cable, the 3.5" adapter, and the 9.5mm shim/plate.
|10-11-2012 05:19 PM|
|10-11-2012 10:27 AM|
|10-11-2012 10:14 AM|
|10-11-2012 08:36 AM|
I also went on Tom's Hardware and looked at their SSD sub-forum. They have a sticky linking to numerous other sites.
|10-11-2012 02:15 AM|
- sent by iPhone App Deals & Steals 3.5.7 -
|10-11-2012 01:09 AM|
|anniest||hate rebates. I will definitely buy if without rebate.|
|10-11-2012 12:01 AM|
|cwing||Picked up 2. One from Tigerdirect and one from CircuitCity using different addresses too!|
|10-10-2012 11:54 PM|
|hellfire127||Does anybody know if this Intel 520 series or the Samsung 320 series would be better for the Lenovo G770?|
|10-10-2012 10:00 PM|
|10-10-2012 09:28 PM|
Yes, that's the thing with SF vs Samsung.
If your using no-trim or something like whole drive encryption, SF is going to take a VERY LARGE performance hit when dealing with 100% un-compressible data.
This only really happens with FDE Full Drive Encryption as none of the data will be compressible.
In that case a Samsung 830 with a tri-core CPU and controller which doesn't rely on compressible data will give you MUCH higher performance then a SF based drive...
That goes for most non-SF based drives.. M4, Etc. Sam830 in our tests produced about 320 MB/S with AES-256 FDE and corei5 cpu w/AESNX extensions.
|This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|