The hottest deals voted on by our community.
Selected and verified by our team of deal editors.
These deals are currently popular in the
community based on votes and comments.
contributed by our community. It's what makes
us different. Do you have a great deal to share
with the Slickdeals community?
See what's coming up on
and get notified when there is a price drop. You also
have access to graphs of recent price history.
community dedicated to sharing, rating,
and reviewing deals and coupons.
See the latest posts, threads, and ratings
as they happen with Slickdeals Live.
our Amazon Fillers tool to make sure your
cart qualifies for free shipping.
Find us, friend us, and connect with us across the web.
You last visited: Today at 02:12 PM
|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|02-27-2013 11:13 AM|
We have an official concession:
|02-27-2013 07:44 AM|
I think you ran out of ideas that passed muster a while back. Unless you wish to step back to the plate and bring something new, I think it's time you walk away or admit defeat.
I'm pretty sure your just going to shoot back a snide comment and pretend none of this ever happened though.
Here is the question again: HOW DO YOU JUSTIFY TAKING MONEY OR DISADVANTAGING THE INNOCENT?
Claim that you answered it all you want, I think people can read your "answer" and judge for themselves.
|02-27-2013 12:42 AM|
|02-27-2013 12:00 AM|
But neither example you provide says anything about a successful government solution.
That you blindly believe that we should be run by technocrats is absurd and perverse.
|02-26-2013 11:37 PM|
BTW, the last time price controls were tried, it was a Republican who done it.
And thank him for the EPA, too.
|02-26-2013 11:33 PM|
|02-26-2013 09:50 PM|
Why the blind faith in "government" to solve anything?
Remember when the government tried to solve high prices by imposing price controls?
Remember when the government tried to solve high unemployment by "investing" in "shovel-ready" projects?
Remember when government tried to solve student underachievement?
Always with this blind faith and appeal to the "government" to solve something.
|02-26-2013 09:47 PM|
Funny how Democrats always appeal to these "rules" without much thought about how the rules are manipulated, well, that is, they feign ignorance while at the same time manipulating rules to engage in social engineering in the classroom, bribe the states, punish the successful, etc.
|02-26-2013 09:04 PM|
Does the solution (AA) qualify as "right" in your judgement?
Whatever the justification, in this case do you find that "taking from innocent" is justified by something?
Is the government decision what justifies it to you?
I believe by your statements that you would say yes to all of the above. If that is true, I think we have both stated our point of view and made it abundantly clear where we stand and that we both feel that we are right and will not budge.
I think we can, fully understanding each other, agree to disagree if you agree that you would answer yes to all three.
|02-26-2013 08:51 PM|
I'll spell it out one more time. There is a sociological problem and the government has determined the best way to solve it. It does not have to qualify as "right" in your judgement, and I doubt any explanation ever will, cause you've made up your mind you don't like it.
I'm not here to meet your expectations.
|02-26-2013 08:34 PM|
And I like the spin to avoid actually answering the question.
We have gone through your whole avoidance loop. We are back where we started and I was still asking the same question. Want to go around again, answer the question, admit defeat, leave silently in defeat, or reply with an attack to divert?
|02-26-2013 07:39 PM|
You're either in this country and agree to play by the rules or you're free to leave.
"Innocence" has nothing to do with it.
|02-26-2013 06:50 PM|
|02-26-2013 06:41 PM|
|02-26-2013 06:39 PM|
|This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|