The hottest deals voted on by our community.
Selected and verified by our team of deal editors.
These deals are currently popular in the
community based on votes and comments.
Low prices and coupons for
The deals and coupons you see on Slickdeals are
contributed by our community. It's what makes
us different. Do you have a great deal to share
with the Slickdeals community?
Track a product from one of our supported stores
and get notified when there is a price drop. You also
have access to graphs of recent price history.
Slickdeals is the leading and most trusted online
community dedicated to sharing, rating,
and reviewing deals and coupons.
See the latest posts, threads, and ratings
as they happen with Slickdeals Live.
If you don't have Amazon Prime you can use
our Amazon Fillers tool to make sure your
cart qualifies for free shipping.
Find us, friend us, and connect with us across the web.
You last visited: Today at 03:33 AM
|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|04-04-2013 01:16 PM|
|04-04-2013 12:35 PM|
On top of buttery backgrounds, FF will give you sharper images with the same lens. If you look at photozone's mtf numbers, the nifty fifty + FF will BEAT a similar crop + 35mm F1.4 L..... let that sink in for a minute, then you realize how valuable a FF upgrade can be.
The old adage Glass over body doesnt apply in the digital age because you have really two different formats sharing similar lenses. FF vs Crop is like MF vs FF. It's a whole different league.
I'm probably rambling too much, but will leave you with this to see the differences in background blur with similar field of views: http://www.flickr.com/photos/8413...40967258
|04-03-2013 09:09 PM|
|04-03-2013 09:03 PM|
|04-03-2013 08:10 PM|
|04-03-2013 06:20 PM|
Go about a 1/4 down and you'll see the Canon comparisons. At f/2.8 it is 920, at f/4 it is 960... so in this test... f/4 is marginally better, but that very well could vary between lenses and your's is indeed sharper at f/2.8.
|04-03-2013 06:14 PM|
|04-03-2013 10:41 AM|
|04-03-2013 08:19 AM|
|04-03-2013 08:15 AM|
on a trip like that, I can carry a 5D, 24-70/24-105, 580ex, and tripod. I carry my camera with me on every single outing, and my normal kit is a 5D, 270ex, and either pancake or nifty fifty. Seriously, you're fooling yourself if you think weight doesnt matter.....
|04-03-2013 07:44 AM|
|04-03-2013 12:11 AM|
Used this lens on my 6D tonight for a school program. It would have been nice to have been longer but we had good seats. Results were great.
It's probably the sharpest lens I own. A little long for indoors around the house but I use a 50 1.4 for that.
|04-02-2013 10:06 PM|
Do I really need the 135 or 100 IS? not really for what I like to shoot and what I already have.
Maybe i may get the 24-70 mark 2 but that will just boil down to "want" and not need.
|04-02-2013 10:01 PM|
|04-02-2013 09:34 PM|
|This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|