You last visited: Today at 08:02 AM
|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|04-18-2013 03:58 PM|
Is this one in the same boat?
|04-18-2013 06:58 AM|
|04-18-2013 06:56 AM|
And the most glaring weakness of the G5 for video is there's no manual control of exposure in video mode. There's also no 24p mode.
|04-18-2013 12:42 AM|
|datatech||G5 is now down to $360 !|
|04-12-2013 10:48 PM|
Not necessarily talking about this particular model, but, there are entry level DSLRs and there are entry level DSLRs. They keep varying by degrees of features, prices and brands among other things.
As you move from a Point and shoot system, your dslr would appear to be more featue rich than "what you would ever need". Many people just stay there.
If you happen to get cozier with the camera and start exploring its innards, you will start discovering what it lacks till the time you make the decision for an expensive upgrade, which is not always easy.
Thus, if you think you would use a DSLR like is meant to be, then buy the best camera your budget would allow.
If you still want to "try before you buy", a pre-owned system may not be a bad investment, something like a D80/D90 or a Rebel. You can still recover a better percent of your investment while splurging later.
For lens, zooming to the tip of mountain top sounds interesting, but, your best photos would be the ones taken at a wider angle. Invest towards an 18 instead of a 200.
|04-12-2013 10:07 PM|
|04-12-2013 09:52 PM|
|04-12-2013 09:12 PM|
In my opinion, I think the Panasonic G5 is a very good deal at this price. I think in a few weeks the price might get even lower since Panasonic will be launching the next update to this camera which is a G6 later this month of April.
Micro four thirds cameras have always been good because of the fact that you can purchase any micro four thirds lens from any manufacturer and it will fit you micro four thirds camera without an adapter. I think a few years from now, micro four thirds will be dominating the market.
I didn't purchase the Canon T4i and instead purchased the G5. Canon, Nikon, and other DSLR companies want you to stick with their system. They want you to buy lenses only for that specific company. So if you have a Canon camera and want to put a Nikon lens, then you have to purchase an adapter. Its always a profit for them since most people will be buying lenses for their specific camera.
Lastly, there is a company called Blackmagic Design who also make cameras. Recent test shots showed that it surpassed Canon 5D Mark III camera by a long shot. They are both in the same price range. Blackmagic is also releasing a new camera with Micro four thirds mount.
|04-12-2013 07:53 PM|
|04-12-2013 07:05 PM|
|04-12-2013 06:45 PM|
In the end, the size won out. I primarily shoot indoors in low-light and I suspect the DSLR would do better in those situations but I'm pretty sure I'd start leaving that camera at home (especially when hiking) unless I was going some place specifically to take photos. I'll probably eventually also pick up a DSLR too.
Edited: Oops...took out the part about in-body image stabilization because the Canon DSLRs don't have them after all.
|04-12-2013 06:32 PM|
|04-12-2013 04:57 PM|
G5 is quite a bit smaller. Lighter too. The Canon body alone is about 30% heavier. And if you check DxOMark, the Canon isn't any better except in the ISO score.
Add to that the fact that the G5 has a 35mm equivalent 300mm focal length compared to 88mm for the Canon and the G5 sounds like a no brainer to me.
|04-12-2013 04:56 PM|
G5 is simply the best HD high frame rate video capturing device you can find for the price. Non of Canon, Nikon, or Sony in same category are comparable to this.
Still camera function is the bonus.
So Best suits video minded people with very very high quality image recording that you would expect only from multi thousand dollar cameras.
|04-12-2013 04:48 PM|
|This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|