The hottest deals voted on by our community.
Selected and verified by our team of deal editors.
These deals are currently popular in the
community based on votes and comments.
Low prices and coupons for
contributed by our community. It's what makes
us different. Do you have a great deal to share
with the Slickdeals community?
and get notified when there is a price drop. You also
have access to graphs of recent price history.
community dedicated to sharing, rating,
and reviewing deals and coupons.
See the latest posts, threads, and ratings
as they happen with Slickdeals Live.
our Amazon Fillers tool to make sure your
cart qualifies for free shipping.
Find us, friend us, and connect with us across the web.
You last visited: Today at 09:39 PM
|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|07-07-2013 02:55 PM|
Apparently he wants Saddam Hussein back
|07-07-2013 08:45 AM|
|07-06-2013 04:21 PM|
|07-06-2013 09:28 AM|
|07-06-2013 09:08 AM|
You've clearly misrepresented or ignored the report in the first place as they make no mention of single data points in 2000 or 2010 as evidence for anything.
Your claim is that they lucked into a cool year at the start and a hot year at the end of their measuring period, which amplified the change. But they considered average temp over the entire decade, and compared it to the previous decade's average temperatures. So the idea that they just looked at the temperature in 2000, the temp in 2010 and said "derrr it's hotter derrrr" is completely misleading.
Do you have a substantive response to the fact that 94% of countries recorded their hottest decade on record? That it was the hottest decade on land and sea in both hemispheres? To the warming trend demonstrated in the report?
The chart in #34 does demonstrate we have continued to have above average temperatures (relative to the baseline). That the climate models have been inaccurate is irrelevant to the historical data, it just demonstrates that climate science is super difficult. Moreover, the models are only valid from 2005 on, all the "data" in the period before is a hindcast, which is about as scientific as tarot cards, so claiming the predictive models show decades of failure is plainly a lie.
But measuring the past is much easier. And you're content to ignore those measurements and the corresponding reports, clinging to an inaccurate prediction as a way to ignore the entirety of the data, which are far more compelling than your claims about scientific conspiracies and misrepresentation of others' arguments (nobody is using the word Armageddon except you).
|07-05-2013 06:47 PM|
I wonder why they didn't pick the 1998 peak to compare to the 2010 peak to conclude the planet is heading to an ice-age ????
sorry..cherry-picking time frames to play games with statistics and present a false urgency of Armageddon doesn't fly.
|07-05-2013 05:23 PM|
UN Charts ‘Unprecedented’ Global Warming Since 2000
|07-04-2013 04:09 PM|
And the midwest experienced record lows and record snowfall during the first few days of MAY (as in exactly two months ago).
|07-03-2013 08:18 PM|
Clearly a scientist who has dealt with tree ring proxy data points and how to compare those to completely different proxy points, like surface temperatures.
|07-03-2013 12:52 PM|
|07-01-2013 02:38 PM|
|07-01-2013 01:57 PM|
|07-01-2013 01:37 PM|
UAH/RSS are the actual temp measurements, the other squiggles are the 'models' used to "predict" life-ending global warming
|07-01-2013 11:29 AM|
|07-01-2013 10:40 AM|
these record temps in Death Valley don't make sense!
I'm certain I read a thread here that said we're in a cooling phase.
|This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|