So you are agreeing with me and Wu that just because an article contains pertinent factual information, the use of some of that wording or information in an articles headline or in the title of a thread does nothing more than sensationalize it at best and at worst, is inflammatory. Why is this thread title still not changed or this thread not closed then if we agree?
I have no interest in arguing against the position you're fabricating, the words you're putting in Wu and I's mouths, nor playing your game at all.
The rules are stated simply, as Wu did, in part to avoid such fruitless arguments.
If you feel a thread title is trolling, MA it. There is not a guarantee we will agree with you, however.
Last edited by trancepire; 08-28-2012 at 11:11 PM..