Is it just me, or does it seem somewhat worthless to have a GT 610M installed in this machine, when Intel HD4000 graphics are just as, if not more, capable? Wouldn't a GT 640M or GT 650M make more sence if you are paying for discrete graphics in the first place? I would rather pay an extra $50 and make it a decent gaming machine.
I guess it's just a matter of timing. If this model of laptop was released before the HD 4000 graphics were first released (Apr of 2012) then it tells me this is an older model of laptop and it would make sense that it has this dedicated card instead of the equivalent HD 4000 graphics card.