
Practical Difference between Point-and-Shoot and DSLRs
A point-and-shoot camera is the compact digital device that elementary schoolers now get as Christmas presents. It’s usually under an inch thick and has a large digital screen where you see the image you’re about to take. Point and shoots have one irreplaceable built-in lens and are generally smaller, lighter and more portable than DSLR’s.
“DSLR” stands for digital single-lens reflex (camera). These are the bigger, bulkier cameras that professional photographers and enthusiasts use. DSLRs have interchangeable lenses depending on your needs, which makes them very adaptable for different situations. This means that if you’re shooting close-ups, you can use a specific lens that will produce the best image for the situation. Likewise, if you’re shooting landscapes, you can switch to a wide-angle lens to capture the image in its entirety.
Technical difference between Compact and DSLRs
A regular compact camera uses two lenses to capture an image. One lens goes to the image recorder (either film or flash memory) while the other goes from the physical lens to the viewfinder. This duality works fine when shooting at mid-range distances (optimal range for the built-in lens), but once you want to capture an image close-up or in wide angle, the image you see on the viewfinder doesn’t accurately reflect what’s being captured.
With an “SLR” (single-lens reflex), there is a mirror and prism mechanism that allows a photographer to see the actual reflection of the image that’s about to be captured with only one lens. Up until 3 or 4 years ago, you had to look through a physical viewfinder to see the image you want to capture with a DSLR and then use digital screen only to preview the photo. Newer DSLRs now have the capability of showing you a preview of the image on the screen before taking the picture.
So...do you need a DSLR?
DSLRs are far more powerful than regular point-and-shoot compact cameras. If taking pictures were the same as computing, the point-and-shoot and DSLR difference is comparable to owning a tablet and a computer. A point-and-shoot will do fine if you’re taking pictures of people who pose for a camera and are always in brightly lit areas, but if you’re capturing movement, unpredictable emotions or milestones, we definitely recommend investing in a DSLR. Image quality is far more superior with an SLR than with a regular point and shoot. Vibration Reduction (VR)/Image Stabilization (IS) lenses produce sharper images due to reduced noise. Having interchangeable lenses lets you find the ideal kinds for specific situations, and the ability to add a flash, use a remote trigger and a number of professional accessories are just some of the DSLR benefits.
Going back to the computing analogy however, if you only need to get on the Internet to check Slickdeals and your email everyday, it makes more sense just to get a tablet than a computer. Bringing the analogy to photography, if you don’t particularly enjoy taking pictures, then maybe sticking with your camera phone is sufficient.
Before you buy...
If we’ve managed to convince you that you do in fact need a DSLR (and not all of you do), here are a few things to consider before making your first purchase:
Brand Consciousness
Unlike most point-and-shoot cameras, brand is actually very important when it comes to DSLRs. The best lenses are usually exclusive to the brand, so when you buy a Canon camera body, you are most likely going to get Canon lenses. The same goes with Nikon, Sony or Panasonic. There are a few brand-agnostic manufacturers (e.g. Sigma, Tamron) who provide the same types of lenses across brands, which may have a few gems in their lineups. Adapters are available to switch from one to the other, but most camera enthusiasts would warn you to stay away from them. The two largest and most popular brands of DSLRs are Canon and Nikon and though there’s a premium for the brand, the accessibility of deals and lenses for these two are worth the initial investment. For Slickdeals in particular, we’ve seen a number of Canon deals on our front page, usually 10-20% cheaper than Nikon ones, and considerably cheaper than Sony and Panasonic.
Recent Slickdeals on DSLR packages

Canon EOS Rebel T4i *Live*
18-135mm STM Lens
PIXMA Pro 9000 Mark II Photo Printer
32 GB memory card
$894 after $400 rebate
Canon EOS Rebel T3i
18-55mm Lens
PIXMA Pro 9000 Mark II Photo Printer
Gadget bag
Replacement battery
$624 after $400 rebate
Canon EOS Rebel T3
18-55mm Lens
EF 75-300mm Lens
EF-S 55-250mm Lens
PIXMA Pro 9000 Mark II Photo Printer
UV Filter
50-pack Photo Paper
$487 after $400 rebate
Nikon D3100
18-55mm VR Lens
$400
Lenses
The most important thing to remember here is that your shot will only be as good as your lens. Even the cheapest DSLR paired up with a good lens can produce images that will trounce a $5,000 camera with a mediocre lens on it. Quality lenses also keep their value should you ever decide that you are tired of swapping them (and get rid of the whole setup).
On the technical side, the Focal Length is a measure of distance where an image focuses. The magic number for camera lens focal length is 50mm. This is the distance where magnification is the same as that of normal vision’s. When a lens is less than 50mm, it’s considered a wide-angle lens and sees more than the eye can see. This would be ideal for landscapes and longshots. Lenses longer than 50mm are telephoto lenses, ideal for capturing close ups and focusing on specific targets.
Most camera starter kits come with an 18-55 lens and many brands have lineups that can complement the kit, such as the Canon 55-250mm or Nikkor 55-200mm as beginner zoom lens.
Recent Slickdeals on Lenses

Image from: http://one.nikonusa.com/V1.aspx
Canon EF 24-105mm $780
Canon EF-S 18-200mm $399
Canon EF-S 55-250mm $240
Accessories
You can buy your accessories as you build your collection, but the one thing you’ll need off the bat is a reliable camera case. It would be a shame to lose a $500 investment because of a $10 case. The neoprene covers are fine if you’re planning on keeping your camera within a sturdier bag, otherwise, it’s best to get a thick name-brand bag that will protect your camera and carry your lenses through events like picnics, graduations and hikes. An immediate second on the list would be a multi-coated UV filter to make images sharper and to protect the lens from dust and scratches.
Cheat Sheet
If you need a quick reference to the pros and cons of point and shoots vs. DSLR's, take a look at chart below:

-----
If you have ever wondered about anything on Slickdeals, please send a PM to oFlamingo with the subject line, “News & Articles”.



In fact I'll take it even further, the dilution of people who don't need nor shouldn't even have a DSLR is hurting "real" photographers...the whole "GWC" (guy with camera) mantra being the forerunner. Yes, I said it and yes I'm a little bitter. I'm all for people wanting one to get great shots of their kids or other family members and stuff like that, but when those some people have absolutely NO SKILL or talent and then they try to pass themselves off as knowledgeable photographers it's just not cool. Even worse are when these same people start taking clients and the poor clients don't even know any better. The amount of "professional" photographers I see today making decent money with shots that looks no better than normal snapshots is frustrating.
Sorry... /end rant
As others have said too, most people simply can't handle a DSLR and will only get frustrated. You only really need one if you find yourself both skilled enough and knowledgeable enough with your point and shoot that you're becoming frustrated at what you can't do. Furthermore, as for printouts, what makes something like an 8x10 portrait look better on a DSLR is generally the lighting that a skilled photographer uses and his knowledge of adjusting the focus area and stuff. Megapixels have very little to do with printouts at this size, so unless you're planning on printing out huge poster sized photos then they matter very little. Even at that there's ways to "add" detail to your shots effectively upping your MP count. So anyway unless you're really planning on learning and practicing lighting and stuff like that then there's really even no point in getting one for family portraits as you'll be able to get close to the same with your point and shoot.
these folks aren't trying to be professionals, they could simply want higher quality pictures from these larger sensor cameras. i.e. parents who like taking pictures of their toddlers running around inside the house. do they really have no business buying DSLRs?
We had a trip coming up for New York City, so perfect time to look for a camera. Ended up getting a Kodak EasyShare Z990 12.0 MP Digital Camera with 30x Optical Zoom, HD Video and 3.0-Inch LCD. I have to say, I love it. I already had a tripod, so I can get some nice shots, even when maxing the zoom. I used the HD video to record my daughters groups concert when they were there. And it has plenty of features to play around with different settings if you want to take it out of auto mode. Got some beautiful shots with this camera. It's bigger than a point and shoot, but does so much more. Also liked having the view finder in addition to the lcd screen. My mother recently picked up a Fuji bridge type camera, another nice middle ground between point and shoot and a DSLR.
these folks aren't trying to be professionals, they could simply want higher quality pictures from these larger sensor cameras. i.e. parents who like taking pictures of their toddlers running around inside the house. do they really have no business buying DSLRs?
As for folks wanting higher quality pictures, what exactly are you saying because ANY "good enough" p&s will make an equally good photo as a DSLR especially in the size of print these folks will print out at OR if displayed on a screen, will look indifferent w/exception of low light where p&s gives you loads of distortion/pixellation and DSLRs will remain clean. So in some rare conditions, the DSLR may pull out a shot the p&s cannot. This said, go look at all of the very best photos ever on Flickr, and the p&s shots will win any contest on there because it's the youth playing around with computers all day long vs. anyone else that cannot get remotely close to keeping up that can process stuff to look incredibly amazing.
In the end, a person chooses what they want. Whether or not there's any debate about it is truly irrelevant since we are not the ones that have any right in saying what another should or should not have as a camera/car/object-device in the life. If a DSLR makes one happy, that's all that matters. If a p&s or cell phone is all one needs (which is indeed all 99% out there really need), they get the snaps, the vid, etc. and the "quality" is important only to the extent that the memory was taken...if the memory comes out washed out or blown out or doesn't come out period, the memory was lost...
Cheers!
yes many factors will make for a better picture, including (not so poor) lighting and knowing how to actually use your gear, but setting all things equal (same picture taker, subject, environment, and lighting), the difference in hardware should put the favor on the auto-mode DSLR delivering a higher quality picture
-----------
also, please see the context of my original post and don't simply reply to my post in isolation. do you think DSLRs are only for professionals? are people in the wrong for using an Automatic mode provided to them by Canon/Nikon/etc? -- why keep on including it even on latest 5D3?
I don't think low light shots are so rare, but this is a matter of opinion I suppose. I wasn't arguing for *most* people who would be satisfied with "good enough" pictures (there are plenty of cameras for them), I believe I specifically referring to folks that want "higher quality" pictures (note: this is a relative term).
yes many factors will make for a better picture, including (not so poor) lighting and knowing how to actually use your gear, but setting all things equal (same picture taker, subject, environment, and lighting), the difference in hardware should put the favor on the auto-mode DSLR delivering a higher quality picture
-----------
also, please see the context of my original post and don't simply reply to my post in isolation. do you think DSLRs are only for professionals? are people in the wrong for using an Automatic mode provided to them by Canon/Nikon/etc? -- why keep on including it even on latest 5D3?
These cameras are big, bulky, not practical to carry around, and no one wants to be farking with shutter speeds and aperture when taking a birthday picture.
Do yourself and your wallet a favor buy buying a regular camera.
I just hate the average slugs who buy these cameras and think they're hot shit for owning one because they were told its "the best" when realistically they don't know wtf they're doing and have no business owning one.
Wow this is an incredibly expensive hobby. I think seeing those prices, made my mind up for me. I thought i can get a DSLR and a good 2 or 3 lens (tele and wide) for $300-$500. That isn't even in the ballpark. This is a $2000 and up hobby.
Makes the $40 i spend quarterly at JCPenny's seem worthwhile.
1. Indoor party in a restaurant or living room with incandescent lighting with the subject within five feet
2. Close up shots of flowers, humming birds in an outdoor setting with moderate day lighting at a distance ten to fifteen feet
3. Fireworks show on July 4th
4. Outdoor group photos/portraits with historic monuments or background
5. Sporting events
6. Kids and toddlers in a indoor living room situation
Please share your thougths
It always amazes me how many have DSLRs and just use them as they would a P&S, complete with the built-in flash, and looking at their pictures, they look far worse than what I would've taken with my old A80 camera. Actually, I've taken better photos with my cell phone camera than they did with their $1000 DSLR.