20" HP 2011x LED Monitor $76, 23" HP 2311x 1080p LED Monitor $115 + More + Free Shipping (expired)

Quote from gabe23111 : 1920 X 1080 resolution

and 7.26 in deep? sheesh!

Quote from kouzmanoff :

otherwise it would be $400-500

but yeah, definitely not worth it as a computer monitor, you just get extra stretched out pixels

They have some of their other monitors for sale using the same code.

I added it to the OP

Quote from kouzmanoff : and 7.26 in deep? sheesh!

I'm gonna safely assume that's referring to the base/stand.

If you have an HPA account, the total is $219.59. Free shipping, but you have to add tax. For Indiana, the total is $234.96

Be careful...some moron at HP thought it best to "modify" their HDMI port to only work with HP computers. I have a 27 on my desk at work and the HDMI connection on the monitor is not standard.

Quote from bolaar : Be careful...some moron at HP thought it best to "modify" their HDMI port to only work with HP computers. I have a 27 on my desk at work and the HDMI connection on the monitor is not standard.

This makes no sense.

Anyone have any experience with this monitor? I am interested but my parents have a 19 inch HP from a year or so ago and its the worst monitor I have ever seen. I'm looking at the Acer on Newegg for $250 as well. Thanks

Quote from bolaar : Be careful...some moron at HP thought it best to "modify" their HDMI port to only work with HP computers. I have a 27 on my desk at work and the HDMI connection on the monitor is not standard.

rofl.

i dont see Specifications said monitor has HDMI?

Probably some of the most retarded comments I have seen in awhile.

It is 7 inches deep with the stand. Less than an inch without.

It has standard HDMI not whatever the hell you are talking about.

Yes it has HDMI.

It has a TON of positive reviews, and the negatives are mostly from IPS display owners who don't mind spending 2-3 times as much. I am not buying one but figured I would comment after reading all the nonsense.

Quote from kouzmanoff : and 7.26 in deep? sheesh!

looks like they just slapped a "HP" logo on a 27" TV and call it a monitor

That's why HP fails and they're laying people off while Apple is busy hiring and raking in billions.

Apple still has the only line of monitors unmatched and no cheaper offerings.

Every Apple monitor and even iMacs are IPS and have 4:3 resolutions instead of these crappy 16:9 that you can't write a paper or browse the web with a 3/4 page view.


2560x1440 then it's a good deal.

Quote from Vision33r : Every Apple monitor and even iMacs are IPS and have 4:3 resolutions instead of these crappy 16:9 that you can't write a paper or browse the web with a 3/4 page view.

Okay, so when you use a 4:3 display, you get 1/2 of a page instead of like 3/8 of a page, wow...

Clearly you don't know that a lot of people who really do a lot of reading on their computers (ie people in a research field) sooner or later wind up using at least 2 monitors, usually with one turned vertically - not only is it ideal for reading pdfs of journal articles, but it makes web page viewing incredibly easy.

I suppose if you want to do light work, the kind that most mac users do - office/instagram/facebook/browsing, then a single monitor is fine, but when you're using lab software that costs many thousands of dollars and is made to be run on a pc with multiple displays, you get a pc with multiple displays.

I can troll too...