Everything You Need to Know Before Buying a 4K TV

Some factors are more important than others when shopping for a new TV. Are you considering the right ones?
Slickdeals content may contain references to products from one or more of our affiliate partners. If you make a purchase on their site through a link on Slickdeals, we receive a small commission. This in no way affects our opinions on products or services mentioned in our content.

Should You Buy a 4K TV Now?

Everything you thought you knew about buying a TV is probably wrong.

Front-and-center of the TV world is 4K or UHD — Ultra High Definition. At this past January's Consumer Electronics Show (CES), every major TV brand showed off new large screen 4K UHD TVs. According to the Consumer Technology Association (the folks who put on CES), a third of the expected 40 million TVs sold in the US this year will be 4K models, and market research company IHS says there will be more than 300 million UHD sets in use globally by 2019.

In other words, 4K isn't just the future of TV — it's the present.

Before we go any further, and to mollify the TV geeks, there is a slight, technically semantically insignificant resolution difference between 4K and UHD. While UHD is the technically correct term, we're going to use "4K" to keep things simple.

At a normal viewing distance — 6 to 8 feet away — it is nearly impossible to tell the difference between a 4K and 2K on a set smaller than 65 inches; in other words, buying a 55-inch 4K TV that you're sitting 6 feet or further from is a waste of money.

4K Advantages

4K TVs produce a resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels — a total of 8 million-plus pixels, as compared to the standard 2 million-plus pixels in 1920 x 1080 HDTVs, which we'll refer to as 2K. In other words, 4K TV offers four times the resolution of 2K TV.

Practically, more pixels means smaller pixels, which means you can sit much closer to a bigger 4K TV screen without seeing the pixels — the dots — that make up the TV picture. As you can see by this chart, optimal viewing distance from a 70-inch 4K TV is less than 5 feet, compared to around 8 feet for a 70-inch 2K set.

To gain the full advantage of 4K, you want as big a set as your room, wallet or significant other will allow. At a normal viewing distance — 6 to 8 feet away — it is nearly impossible to tell the difference between a 4K and 2K on a set smaller than 65 inches; in other words, buying a 55-inch 4K TV that you're sitting 6 feet or further from is a waste of money.

What Is 'HDR'?

More important to picture quality than higher 4K resolution is HDR, or High Dynamic Range. Rather than adding more pixels, HDR vastly expands contrast, illuminating picture details often bleached out by bright lights (the sun, car headlights, flood lights, explosions) or buried in deep shadows. HDR's startling detail boosts are far more noticeable to the naked eye than the often subtle differences between 4K and 2K.

There are actually two flavors of HDR: the industry standard HDR10 and Dolby's slightly spiced-up Dolby Vision, initially found on 4K TVs from Vizio and LG. Most of us won't be able to tell the difference between the two, and any Dolby Vision-enabled UHD Blu-ray discs will display just fine on non-Dolby Vision HDR10 4K TVs.

Adding to the HDR improvement is a technology called Wide Color Gamut (WCG), which expands the color palette a TV can display. As a result of the contrast and color palette improvements, the images on a 4K TV with HDR and WCG look more lifelike than on any TV you've ever seen.

Only a handful of 2015 4K TVs include both HDR and WCG, as well as the necessary HDMI 2.0a jacks necessary to convey these signals from a 4K media streamer or UHD Blu-ray deck to your 4K TV. But if you're in the market for a new big screen TV, going for a 65-inch-plus 4K UHD with HDR and WCG is going to give you the best viewing experience, and will be the most future-proof option. Of course, it's also the most expensive, which we'll get to a bit later.

What Can I Watch in 4K?

Show you can watch on Netflix in 4K quality

There isn't any 4K content available from traditional TV or cable broadcasters, and likely won't be for a few years. However, both DirecTV and DISH Network offer 4K content access via special 4K equipment.

For current cable content, 4K TVs "upconvert" standard 2K to 4K. Just how a 4K TV performs this digital upconverting trickery varies from maker to maker, and may be a more critical difference than any other when comparing 4K models. Unfortunately, there is no way to compare the upconverting capabilities of one set vs. another except by reading reviews of specific UHD models.

Most 4K content is available from streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Instant Video, and is accessed via apps on smart 4K TVs or through 4K-compatible media streamers, such as the latest Roku 4 ($129.99) and Amazon Fire TV ($99.99) boxes. The latest Apple TV box is NOT 4K compatible. (You can find a constantly updated list of 4K content sources here.) Most new 4K content includes HDR.

Coming next will be UHD Blu-ray players — the first of which is the Samsung UBD-K8500 ($499.99, on sale for $399.99). Panasonic and Philips will release UHD Blu-ray decks later this summer. CNET reviewed the Samsung UBD-K8500 and summarized it as a device that "delivers the best in-home video quality ever, but only owners of the latest, most expensive TVs need apply."

There will be a growing number of UHD Blu-ray titles with HDR available, around 100 by the end of the year, from nearly all the major Hollywood studios save Disney and Paramount, so no Pixar or Star Trek 4K Blu-rays — yet.

threadID: 8875903threadID: 8829227

The Myth of Curved TV

What you don't want is a curved TV, 4K or 2K.

Curved TVs are a cynical marketing gimmick, concocted by television makers to physically differentiate their 4K sets from 2K sets on the retail sales floor. TV makers knew most folks wouldn't be able to discern the subtle differences between 4K and 2K. Curving a TV was a really obvious difference, and manufacturers then wove a story about how a curved TV "enveloped" the viewer in the action.

Horse droppings.

Curved TVs actually produce three TV viewing drawbacks. First, a curved TV limits a TVs off-angle viewing, so anyone watching from the side won't see as much as on a flat screen. Second, like a curved mirror, a curved TV exacerbates reflected ambient light. Third, the whole idea of LCD TV is how décor-friendly flat it is, especially if you mount your TV on a wall. A curved TV makes a thin TV fat again, eliminating one of LCD's primary selling points. It's like going on a diet and losing 30 pounds, then going out with a pillow stuffed in your shirt.

Do not be lured or talked into buying a curved TV.

LCD LED vs. OLED

Among video aficionados, the best HDTVs were plasmas, which offered far deeper blacks and higher contrast than LCD LED TVs. But plasma TVs are, lamentably, gone. Plasma's deep black legacy has been assumed by OLED — Organic Light Emitting Diodes — available exclusively from LG.

But before we get to the whys of OLED's superiority, what's wrong with LCD LED?

Backlighting.

LCD TVs require artificial illumination, using LED backlighting (which is why LCD sets are referred to as "LED"), which is indiscriminate. No matter how dark a scene is supposed to be, there's still backlighting behind it that leaves "black" portions of a scene looking more like dark charcoal. This backlight light-bleed lowers overall color intensity, which is why LCD sets need technologies like HDR, WCG and a new LCD color-boosting filter technology called "quantum dot."

OLED, however, offers the same high contrast and deep color advantages as plasma because, like plasma, OLED also is self-illuminating — no backlight needed (a technology referred to as "remissive"). The color and brightness of each pixel in an OLED TV can be individually adjusted according to the needs of the image. If a portion of a scene is supposed to be pure black — think deep space scenes in "Gravity," "Interstellar," "2001: A Space Odyssey," et al. — those pixels can be turned completely off. Off means no light, which translates into the purest blacks possible. And that pure black means colors jump off the screen and produce more palpable 3D-like depth, sans glasses.

OLED UHDs also are pencil thin, around .15 to .25 of an inch at their thinnest, depending on the model. LG has exhibited bendable 55-inch "wallpaper" TV as thin as a piece of cardboard, and is developing flexible OLED that you can actually roll up into a tube. Even with its stand, LG's latest 65-inch OLED, the OLED65E6P ($6,999.99) is just 7.9 inches thick, and just 2.2 inches thick sans stand for wall-mounting.

OLED Drawbacks

Father and son watching TV and eating popcorn

Why don't other TV brands offer OLED sets? Not because they don't want to; it's because they can't. LG bought the OLED technology from its inventor, Kodak, so they have the keys to the OLED kingdom. Samsung, Sony and Panasonic have tried to make OLEDs, but couldn't solve the manufacturing puzzle. So LG being the lone OLED maker should not be a deterrent to consideration — there are no compatibility issues whatsoever.

The problem is OLED's premium pricing. Yes, $7,000 for a 4K OLED, and that's not even LG's priciest model; its Signature OLED65G6P is $7,999.99. However, last year's critically acclaimed HDR/WCG-compatible 65EF9500 is "just" $4,999.99.

But comparable flat big-screen 4K LCD LED models with full-array local dimming (FALD) and HDR/WCG aren't that much cheaper; Sony makes only the soon-to-ship 75-inch X940D ($7,999.99) with all these state-of-the-art attributes, while Vizio's flat Dolby Vision Reference Series RS65-B2 costs $5,999.99.

Like plasma, OLED sets also are susceptible to image burn-in. LG acknowledges this issue in its OLED user manuals, and the sets include technologies to minimize after-images.

threadID: 8841639

Pricing and the Bottom Line

You can buy a 55-inch 4K UHD for less than $1,000. But if you're going to sit more than six feet away from it, you also can buy a high-quality 55-inch 2K TV for less than half that price and its picture will look just as good from that distance. Really. Only gamers with their noses practically pressed against the screen will see an advantage of a 4K set smaller than 65 inches.

If you're going to buy a 4K TV, you want at least a 65-inch model. Big screen 2015 4K TVs without HDR and WCG technologies will look better than 2K sets, and will run you between $1,500 (such as the FALD-equipped Vizio M65-C1) and $3,000.

Unfortunately, now may not be the best time to buy a 4K UHD, at least not a new set. New models are just now hitting the market, which means you'll only find deals on last year's sets. The best time to buy a TV is always the week before the Super Bowl, or in the late fall when TV makers unveil new models for the holiday season.

But if you really want to buy now, and you really want the best TV you can get to enjoy the highest-quality 4K HDR content for years to come, you'll have to make a nearly full-priced investment in a late 2015 or new 2016 model with HDR and WCG technology.

When you're ready to buy, look at sites that offer free shipping to wherever you live, including Amazon, Abe's of Maine, Adorama, Best Buy, eBay and Rakuten. Each has its own rhyme or reason for holding periodic sales on particular brands, so check our store pages frequently. Or better yet, visit the Slickdeals 4K TV Deals page to keep up to date on the best TV deals.

4k TV infographic

Images courtesy of LG, Netflix, Thinkstock



Add a Comment
About the Author
Stewart Wolpin Contributor

Stewart Wolpin has been writing about how to buy electronics for over 30 years. When he’s not buried in gadgets and gizmos, he writes for eBay about the latest tech trends.

13 Comments

1
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined May 2012
L1: Learner
2 Posts
10 Reputation
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not rep overxkooled?
#2
What a great read! Plenty of insight on the market for TVs as of late. Thanks so much for posting this.
Reply Helpful Comment? 5 0
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Aug 2007
L5: Journeyman
585 Posts
86 Reputation
#3
I wouldn't outright dismiss curved screens. It really depends on the application of the TV. If you're going to be using a 4K TV as a monitor, going curved is actually not a bad option. The reason why a lot of ultrawide monitors(21:9 ratio) go curved is because it really does help when you are sitting closer to the screen and want to use less of your neck when viewing the entire screen.

With all that said, yes, in a living room, a 65" curved screen is a gimmick because you're typically anywhere from 10-15 feet away from the TV. It won't do you any good. Just figured I'd add this comment to say that not all curved screens are gimmicks. My 2 cents.
Reply Helpful Comment? 2 1
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Oct 2015
New User
11 Posts
10 Reputation
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not rep cujog?
#4
Good article, although as someone currently shopping for a TV, one of my struggles has been finding a GREAT NON-4k tv. I don't believe, or necessarily want a 4k tv, however I do want great picture quality and overall experience. I've found manufacturers are packaging 1080p's as economy options...

Honestly I'm only looking for something in the 48-50 inch range, I don't want anything bigger for my room. Currently I'm looking at the samsung 8500 series.

If there was a 1080p, 120 native refresh rate, great picture quality TV, I would jump on it.

If anyone has a suggestion I'm open ears.
Reply Helpful Comment? 3 0
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Nov 2015
L3: Novice
196 Posts
28 Reputation
#5
Great article. One question though, I'm looking for a new family room TV where we sit about 15 feet from the TV. We currently have a 46" 1080p. We have no issues with this TV other than being so far from it, something it's tough to make out smaller details purely from being so far away (we think). It honestly only happens maybe once a week for me where I lean forward and squint for whatever detail I'm looking for.

My wife and I are no videophiles. We very rarely will play a video game but it's not at any "high level." We watch cable TV and Netflix. I don't care about the "blacks being grey."

After looking at the TV resolution/sizing chart that was very helpful, it appears we could totally get away with a 65" in 1080p. But I'm worried that at that size there may be a non-linear scaling issue where we'll get the TV all setup and it's clearly noticeable that the resolution looks a bit off since there's so much more surface area to fit 1080p pixels over our 46".

Do you think that I'm overthinking this, and the resolution/distance chart will hold true? We'd really like something bigger.

Thanks!
Reply Helpful Comment? 1 0
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Dec 2015
The Watcher
542 Posts
#6
Great advice, Stewart!

Your advice mirrors my own. I think I'll even throw this link up on my FB page.
Reply Helpful Comment? 0 0
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Dec 2009
Temporarily Banned
1,039 Posts
658 Reputation
#7
Quote from jkelley.chbe
:
Great article. One question though, I'm looking for a new family room TV where we sit about 15 feet from the TV. We currently have a 46" 1080p. We have no issues with this TV other than being so far from it, something it's tough to make out smaller details purely from being so far away (we think). It honestly only happens maybe once a week for me where I lean forward and squint for whatever detail I'm looking for.

My wife and I are no videophiles. We very rarely will play a video game but it's not at any "high level." We watch cable TV and Netflix. I don't care about the "blacks being grey."

After looking at the TV resolution/sizing chart that was very helpful, it appears we could totally get away with a 65" in 1080p. But I'm worried that at that size there may be a non-linear scaling issue where we'll get the TV all setup and it's clearly noticeable that the resolution looks a bit off since there's so much more surface area to fit 1080p pixels over our 46".

Do you think that I'm overthinking this, and the resolution/distance chart will hold true? We'd really like something bigger.

Thanks!
If you don't even care about blacks being grey then honestly just get the biggest TV you can afford and enjoy it... when "the blacks are grey" all kinds of screen uniformity issue show much more too. Honestly, a 65" 4k is worth it because at 65" there aren't many good 1080p's left anyway. You can get very solid Vizio D series 65" 4k for $900-1000 and the blacks will be really black whether you care or not Wink
Reply Helpful Comment? 2 0
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Jun 2008
There is no spoon
822 Posts
166 Reputation
#8
I got the 65" LG 7300 from HHGregg for $798 several months ago during their presidents day sale. Pretty happy with it.

Although I still watch most of my shows on my 50" 1080P Seiki.

I went with the 4K because TV last for years. It is kind of useless right now but if you are buying a new TV you might as well jump on it, just for future support. It is pretty useless. No content is 4K. Sure Netflix has a 4K if you have a perfect internet connection. I am pretty impressed with the quality of the 4K LG though.
Reply Helpful Comment? 0 0
Last edited by player911 April 27, 2016 at 08:01 PM.
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Dec 2009
L6: Expert
1,331 Posts
184 Reputation
#9
I have the curved 55" LG OLED. I absolutely love it, and when you sit directly in front of it......wait for it......yes you do feel an immersed feeling when watching the tv. our couch is maybe 6-7 feet away from the TV. I love it!
Reply Helpful Comment? 0 0
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Sep 2015
L2: Beginner
39 Posts
10 Reputation
#10
More emphasis needs to be placed on the method of delivery of your content. If your main content supplier cannot delivery 4k or even 1080p, there is no use to get 4K.
Reply Helpful Comment? 0 0
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Aug 2004
Specifics Bob!! Specifics
9,116 Posts
3,629 Reputation
#11
Why is Abes of Maine included in this article as if it's a LEGIT seller.
This is a BAIT & SWITCH Scamming site.
Ring the Bell **** SHAME **** SDs writer you should know better **** SHAME ****
Reply Helpful Comment? 2 0
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Jul 2005
L2: Beginner
63 Posts
24 Reputation
#12
Quote from danbfree
:
If you don't even care about blacks being grey then honestly just get the biggest TV you can afford and enjoy it... when "the blacks are grey" all kinds of screen uniformity issue show much more too. Honestly, a 65" 4k is worth it because at 65" there aren't many good 1080p's left anyway. You can get very solid Vizio D series 65" 4k for $900-1000 and the blacks will be really black whether you care or not
Quote from jkelley.chbe
:
Great article. One question though, I'm looking for a new family room TV where we sit about 15 feet from the TV. We currently have a 46" 1080p. We have no issues with this TV other than being so far from it, something it's tough to make out smaller details purely from being so far away (we think). It honestly only happens maybe once a week for me where I lean forward and squint for whatever detail I'm looking for.

My wife and I are no videophiles. We very rarely will play a video game but it's not at any "high level." We watch cable TV and Netflix. I don't care about the "blacks being grey."

After looking at the TV resolution/sizing chart that was very helpful, it appears we could totally get away with a 65" in 1080p. But I'm worried that at that size there may be a non-linear scaling issue where we'll get the TV all setup and it's clearly noticeable that the resolution looks a bit off since there's so much more surface area to fit 1080p pixels over our 46".

Do you think that I'm overthinking this, and the resolution/distance chart will hold true? We'd really like something bigger.

Thanks!
Take a look at Mitsubishi DLPs around 70-80 inches. Great TVs except bulb replacement which is not too complicated I have done it myself to our 73 inch model. Also, lots of people dont seems to understand why it does not turn back ON when they want it to (its feature not bug). Might be able to get this 73 incher for $500 or so .. I have it for 4 years and loving it: http://www.samsclub.com/sams/73-m...5890168.ip
Reply Helpful Comment? 0 0
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Jun 2016
New User
1 Posts
10 Reputation
#13
Completely wrong-headed about curved TV, in a otherwise sensible article. The curved surface is much less likely to become totally washed out across its entire surface from light reflecting from the side. I know this because I have owned both and the curved wins handily here. He also wrongfully explains extreme side viewing angle problems with curved screens. A much bigger issue is the disadvantage of LCD vs OLED, not whether the surface is slightly curved or not. I have a curved OLED screen that looks good even when you are almost perpendicular. LCDs begin to change color and look ugly way before you get far enough to the side where a curved screen would possibly be an issue. So just get an OLED screen, curved or flat doesn't matter you'll be in love with it. A curved screen helps minimize total wash out from light reflecting from a flat plane, which in real life would be a sun-lit window. Reflected window light can still be a problem but instead it will be only in one vertical area of the curved screen instead of having it completely blind you at certain angles, making you move your viewing position. Both designs, flat and curved do not perfectly deal with light reflectivity, just differently. Unfortunately you can't judge screen reflections well in most showrooms because of overhead lighting and the lack of outdoor light entering from the side. But you can see the huge difference in how good the picture looks from the side, OLED vs LCD.
Reply Helpful Comment? 0 0
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Jun 2013
L1: Learner
9 Posts
10 Reputation
#14
cool beans, they just had a 75 lg for 19999.99
Reply Helpful Comment? 0 0
Page 1 of 1
1
Join the Conversation
Add a Comment
 
Copyright 1999 - 2018. Slickdeals, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Copyright / Infringement Policy  •  Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Service  •  Acceptable Use Policy (Rules)  •  Interest-Based Ads
Link Copied to Clipboard