Forum Thread

Samsung QLED 65Q9F (QN65Q9FAMFXZA) B&H Photo Video $2499

$2,499.00
-17 Deal Score
3,872 Views
Not sure if this is a price mistake but its cheaper than I have seen anywhere by far, was able to get Best Buy to price match with no issues....


https://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/...ku=1320374
Good deal?
You gave rep to ktennant2636 for this post.
Thank you!
ktennant2636 posted this deal. Say thanks!
Give Rep Points
Add Comment
Created 12-25-2017 at 09:03 AM by ktennant2636
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
Deal
Score
-17
3,872 Views
$2,499.00
Want more deals like this? Create a deal alert for 4K TVs.
Add Deal Alert for 4K TVs

23 Comments

1 2

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Nov 2015
L3: Novice
407 Posts
48 Reputation
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not rep malget?
#2
You should have got the 88". It's only $17,500 more.
Reply Helpful Comment? 3 0
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Aug 2012
L7: Teacher
2,182 Posts
584 Reputation
#3
2500 might as well go for oled.
Reply Helpful Comment? 1 0
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Oct 2017
L5: Journeyman
995 Posts
2,728 Reputation
Pro
#4
Reply Helpful Comment? 0 0
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Aug 2011
L6: Expert
1,511 Posts
331 Reputation
#5
$1000 cheaper than Amazon and no tax-

https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-El...famfxza%29
Reply Helpful Comment? 0 1
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Dec 2012
L3: Novice
260 Posts
18 Reputation
#6
I looked at this before I bought my KS 9800. The 2016 KS9800 is a lot better TV and full array back light for $1800 at Amazon. no tax cause it's sold by Vanns and fulfilled by Amazon.
Reply Helpful Comment? 0 0
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined May 2016
New User
9 Posts
10 Reputation
#7
Bought this same tv at video only for 1800 during thanksgiving
Reply Helpful Comment? 0 0
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Sep 2013
Seeker of Deals
181 Posts
108 Reputation
Original Poster
#8
Quote from gvarapu
:
Bought this same tv at video only for 1800 during thanksgiving

you bought a 65 Q9 for $1800? Think you might be confused.
Reply Helpful Comment? 0 0

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Sep 2013
Seeker of Deals
181 Posts
108 Reputation
Original Poster
#9
Quote from DonC69
:
I looked at this before I bought my KS 9800. The 2016 KS9800 is a lot better TV and full array back light for $1800 at Amazon. no tax cause it's sold by Vanns and fulfilled by Amazon.

You've viewed them side by side? All of the AVS forum members and tests I have seen say that despite it being backlit it outperforms the 9800 in all areas including black level.
Reply Helpful Comment? 0 0
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Dec 2012
L3: Novice
260 Posts
18 Reputation
#10
Quote from ktennant2636
:
You've viewed them side by side? All of the AVS forum members and tests I have seen say that despite it being backlit it outperforms the 9800 in all areas including black level.
No. Not side by side. And it's my opinion, especially for the price difference the ks9800 is the better display....
Also on AVS forum it is widely accepted that the 2017 Q models are a step backwards compared to the 2016..
Reply Helpful Comment? 0 0
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Feb 2010
L3: Novice
244 Posts
54 Reputation
#11
Quote from JMF8448
:
You can PM here https://www.joesav.com/Samsung-QL...LgQAvD_BwE
Yep, $1988 free shipping no tax. Over $500 cheaper than OPs deal

Also, Sams and Walmart 2198 and 2197 respectively.
Reply Helpful Comment? 0 0
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Sep 2013
Seeker of Deals
181 Posts
108 Reputation
Original Poster
#12
Quote from SeveranceOfTime
:
Yep, $1988 free shipping no tax. Over $500 cheaper than OPs deal

Also, Sams and Walmart 2198 and 2197 respectively.

What are you talking about? Sams and Walmart do not have the Q9 for that price, they have the Q7 which is significantly cheaper and significantly worse quality....Please confirm things before you post.
Reply Helpful Comment? 0 0
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Sep 2013
Seeker of Deals
181 Posts
108 Reputation
Original Poster
#13
Quote from DonC69
:
No. Not side by side. And it's my opinion, especially for the price difference the ks9800 is the better display....
Also on AVS forum it is widely accepted that the 2017 Q models are a step backwards compared to the 2016..

Cant get my eyes on a Q9 before I ordered but I can definitely say no matter the settings the 9800 I owned had quite a bit of judder when the camera would pan on almost everything. Glad you're enjoying yours, it was a great set other than that.
Reply Helpful Comment? 1 0
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Dec 2012
L3: Novice
260 Posts
18 Reputation
#14
Quote from ktennant2636
:
Cant get my eyes on a Q9 before I ordered but I can definitely say no matter the settings the 9800 I owned had quite a bit of judder when the camera would pan on almost everything. Glad you're enjoying yours, it was a great set other than that.
Do you know when your build date was? Mine is January of 2017, I wonder if that makes a difference. I'm sure there are better sets out there, but for $1800 and no tax. I couldn't beat it. And the Sony x900e had horrible lag, at least to me.
Reply Helpful Comment? 0 0
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Sep 2013
Seeker of Deals
181 Posts
108 Reputation
Original Poster
#15
Quote from DonC69
:
Do you know when your build date was? Mine is January of 2017, I wonder if that makes a difference. I'm sure there are better sets out there, but for $1800 and no tax. I couldn't beat it. And the Sony x900e had horrible lag, at least to me.

Mine was a 2016 build, cant remember the month. If the Q9 doesn't perform the way I am reading then I will be repurchasing the 9800 because it is the best picture I've seen in person thus far, Sony and LG just cant get that POP that Samsung color gives you in my opinion. I returned a Z9D for issues with smearing because Sony has been notorious for slow pixel response time as of late.
Reply Helpful Comment? 1 0
Page 1 of 2
1 2
Join the Conversation
Add a Comment
 
Copyright 1999 - 2018. Slickdeals, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Copyright / Infringement Policy  •  Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Service  •  Acceptable Use Policy (Rules)  •  Interest-Based Ads
Link Copied to Clipboard