Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Frontpage
Nikon D850 DSLR Camera Body (Refurbished)
$2399
$3,296.95
+ Free Shipping
Adorama has Nikon D850 DSLR Camera Body (Refurbished) on sale for $2399. Shipping is free. Thanks iconian
Original Post
Written by
Edited October 8, 2019
at 08:47 AM
Created 10-04-2019
at 03:03 PM
by iconian | Staff
in
DSLR
(5)
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
Recommended Deal Alerts For You
What are Deal Alerts?
Want more deals like this?
Create a deal alert for DSLR.
Add Deal Alert for DSLR
More Tech & Electronics Deals & Discounts
View AllFrontpage
Frontpage
$250
& More w/ Activation (new line or account) + Free Shipping
52
252
Frontpage
$1050
& More (In-Store Only, Limited Locations)
59
202
Frontpage
Frontpage
$199
($5.53/Month for 36-Months) + Free S/H
54
211
72 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
As for mirrorless vs DSLR, the Nikon D850 is clearly one of the very best cameras in the world, and there isn't a mirrorless camera that comes close for $2,400.
http://www.northruppho
Few good pics, but nothing outstanding.
Nobody shoots the way the weather sealing test was performed, it's unrealistic, and it can be solved with a 10cent plastic bag. On the flip side, the shutter issue cant be solved. The Nikons especially have had horrific shutter issues, the D750 had a recall, D600, D800 replaced, not very trustworthy. It's akin to thinking that blackberries were better than iphones. Bigger with more mechanics != better.
If you're shooting strictly portraits, landscape or astro--no big deal, your environment will always be there. But if you're shooting sports or a journalism assignment, and you have to get the shot, you shouldn't have to pray your battery door or memory card door on your $2-3.5K camera doesn't leak.
As someone who has shot Sony exclusively for four years (rx100ii, a6000, a7r, a77, a77ii, a99ii), and Canon or Nikon for five before that (60D, 6D, D400), the weather sealing is not the same and either are the quality of the knobs/dials. Image quality and AF, Sony wins all day.
Also, replacing a $300 shutter is nobody's idea of fun but it is far from the end of the world.
Hate all u want mirrorless is better not cheaper
Eye tracking and FPS shooting is awesome.
I spent a lot of time researching and ended on the Sony a7iii .
So happy I did.
Those alone make DSLR handicapped and nauseum.
Hate all u want mirrorless is better not cheaper
Eye tracking and FPS shooting is awesome.
I spent a lot of time researching and ended on the Sony a7iii .
So happy I did.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
and the dumbest comment of the thread here...😁
they are rated for different amounts, consumer grade stuff is 100-200K, really high end can go as high as 500K.
again, changing the definition of durability, moving parts matter. I've dropped my R3 on pavement, and it survived, so anecdotally, it's pretty damn durable. I've never dropped any of my dslr's. With the shutter, it is know, you run out of time, where mirrorless has the potential to go forever. You have low shutter count because you're aware that it affects longevity, with my A9, i simply dont care how much I shoot, I only care about the sequences it captures. I can filter through junk shots super fast, tag the good ones, and only import the good ones.
it changes your entire behavior if you know you can go forever.
As for mirrorless vs DSLR, the Nikon D850 is clearly one of the very best cameras in the world, and there isn't a mirrorless camera that comes close for $2,400.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SFq1_I
His complaints on the Nikon Z50 is so ridiculous
Nikon should use a different mount - LMAO, this guy has zero foresight
F mount would be better than Z mount - yeah.... right..... again, zero foresight
Not enough lenses..... well.... it's a relatively new mount.......... and oh yeah, adapter.... too expensive...... legit gripe.... but still, that's not a mistake about using the Z mount, just a casualty.
Complains about size that would incur while using FF glass on APS-C (not entirely true), suggests a mount that uses the largest lenses AND larger bodies.....
Complains that the Z mount guarantees large lenses, doesnt acknowledge that the lenses that have been released are SMALL.
Complains that buyers need simplicity between APS-C vs FF glass with different mounts..... F mount DOES NOT SOLVE the issue, never will, what a joke. If anything, it confuses the nikon users, are you with mirrorless or not? make up your friggin mind and stick with the mirrorless mount. Canon has two mounts for mirrorless, their system is a real mess, why would nikon go a similar route moving forward?
this is one of his most outlandish, poorly thought out videos he's ever made.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SFq1_I
His complaints on the Nikon Z50 is so ridiculous
Nikon should use a different mount - LMAO, this guy has zero foresight
F mount would be better than Z mount - yeah.... right..... again, zero foresight
Not enough lenses..... well.... it's a relatively new mount.......... and oh yeah, adapter.... too expensive...... legit gripe.... but still, that's not a mistake about using the Z mount, just a casualty.
Complains about size that would incur while using FF glass on APS-C (not entirely true), suggests a mount that uses the largest lenses AND larger bodies.....
Complains that the Z mount guarantees large lenses, doesnt acknowledge that the lenses that have been released are SMALL.
Complains that buyers need simplicity between APS-C vs FF glass with different mounts..... F mount DOES NOT SOLVE the issue, never will, what a joke. If anything, it confuses the nikon users, are you with mirrorless or not? make up your friggin mind and stick with the mirrorless mount. Canon has two mounts for mirrorless, their system is a real mess, why would nikon go a similar route moving forward?
this is one of his most outlandish, poorly thought out videos he's ever made.
I agree, Tony misses the mark on this one. Video feels very thrown together and not well thought out.
I do agree that not including in camera IS is a mistake (Nikon should be pushing that on all their Z bodies). Otherwise this is just a really nit picky video full of specious arguments.
Those alone make DSLR handicapped and nauseum.
DSLR + 4,000 max shots, lag free OVF, cheap AF lenses. Use a hand or hood to shade 3x in bright sun. I focus peak all the time. Flash shooters will see no difference.
Mirrorless -1,000 max shots, laggy EVF( getting better), cheap adaptered MF lenses. Amazing all in one video camera. Native AF glass is more $2000-4000, More 3rd party native mount us recently available, 3rd party AF adapted is hit n miss.
35mm- 24 max shots, 1 week Preview, Dirt cheap metal brick.