Sorry, this deal has expired. Get notified of deals like this in the future. Add Deal Alert for this Item
Frontpage Deal

32" Monoprice Vivid 3840x2160 4K 60Hz IPS Monitor EXPIRED

$415
$599.99
+ Free Shipping
+47 Deal Score
60,990 Views
Monoprice has 32" Monoprice Vivid 3840x2160 4K 60Hz IPS Monitor (38577) for $415.20. Shipping is free. Thanks rios7

Specs:
  • Resolution: 3840x2160
  • Refresh Rate: 60Hz
  • Contrast Ratio: 1300:1
  • Response Time: 2ms (GTG)
  • Viewing Angle: 178°H/178°V
  • Panel Type: IPS
  • VESA DisplayHDR 400
  • Inputs:
    • 1x HDMI v2.0
    • 1x DisplayPort v1.2
    • 1x USB Type-C
Share
Good deal?
You gave thanks to rios7 for this post.
Thank you!
rios7 posted this deal. Say thanks!

Original Post

Written by
Edited May 8, 2020 at 07:01 PM by
Monoprice 32in Vivid Monitor - 4K UHD, 60Hz, HDR400, IPS $415.20 ($599.99-30.8%)

https://www.monoprice.com/product?p_id=38577
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
$74.00
137 301
$64.00
64 186
$259.00
23 28
Frontpage Deal
$167
+ Free Shipping
107 143
Deal
Score
+47
60,990 Views
$415
$599.99
About the OP
Send Message
Pro
Joined Sep 2019 L6: Expert
379 Reputation Points
7 Deals Posted
2,729 Votes Submitted
924 Comments Posted

Community Wiki

Last Edited by BayAreaBMWFan May 23, 2020 at 11:16 AM
From Monoprice Support:

1. No Windows Drivers
2. No internal speakers; the OSD menu is for the audio output
3. USB ports are for charging only; no USB hub.

Panel is http://www.panelook.com/LM315WR1-...40457.html

(400 cd/m2 brightness)

Uploaded PDF of product page since it was pulled down earlier from the website.


But great for the price!

I wish they had charged $5 more to include the speakers and the USB hub.

186 Comments

1

Featured Comments

These won't do HDR and freesync together. HDR only works on HDMI and Freesync only works on display port on these. I found out the hard way and had to RMA two of them.
usb-c only supports 4k@30hz, which seems not very useful.
In full spec:
Maximum HDMI/DP Resolution3840 x 2160 @60Hz
Maximum USB Type-C Resolution3840 x 2160 @30Hz

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users Show Post
HIDDEN
05-07-2020 at 12:47 PM
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Dec 2017
L1: Learner
7 Posts
22 Reputation
#5
usb-c only supports 4k@30hz, which seems not very useful.
22
0
0
0
Reply
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users Show Post
HIDDEN
05-07-2020 at 02:40 PM
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Dec 2017
L1: Learner
7 Posts
22 Reputation
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank ?
#7
Quote from TinCanFury
:
According to the linked webpage,

1x HDMI® 2.0, 1x DisplayPort® 1.2, 1x USB Type-C
Maximum HDMI/DP Resolution 3840 x 2160 @60Hz
In full spec:
Maximum HDMI/DP Resolution3840 x 2160 @60Hz
Maximum USB Type-C Resolution3840 x 2160 @30Hz
17
0
1
0
Reply
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users Show Post
HIDDEN
05-07-2020 at 02:53 PM
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Oct 2006
L6: Expert
1,824 Posts
270 Reputation
#9
If you want a better quality monitor and don't care about HDR, you may want to consider this instead:
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/pr...k_uhd.html
4
0
0
4
Reply
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Aug 2004
L3: Novice
185 Posts
32 Reputation
#10
Quote from pidge
:
If you want a better quality monitor and don't care about HDR, you may want to consider this instead:
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/pr...k_uhd.html
I'm not saying you're wrong, but what makes you think the one you linked is a better quality monitor? Is there something that substantiates this claim? The panel in the monoprice monitor from the OP is an A+ lg panel with 400 nit brightness as opposed to the 350 nit brightness in the one you linked. Again, this is genuine curiosity and I'm thinking about returning the two 250 nit ones I bought from the last monoprice 4k 32 inch sale for two of this model.
10
0
0
2
Reply

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Oct 2006
L6: Expert
1,824 Posts
270 Reputation
#11
Quote from quacktastic
:
I'm not saying you're wrong, but what makes you think the one you linked is a better quality monitor? Is there something that substantiates this claim? The panel in the monoprice monitor from the OP is an A+ lg panel with 400 nit brightness as opposed to the 350 nit brightness in the one you linked. Again, this is genuine curiosity and I'm thinking about returning the two 250 nit ones I bought from the last monoprice 4k 32 inch sale for two of this model.
Not hating on Monoprice in general. I just tend to read more quality control issues on Monoprice monitor reviews in general.
3
0
2
4
Reply
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Aug 2004
L3: Novice
185 Posts
32 Reputation
#12
Quote from pidge
:
Not hating on Monoprice in general. I just tend to read more quality control issues on Monoprice monitor reviews in general.
Fair enough, the difference in price for me would be enough to deal with the monoprice brand. I bought two of the 32" 4k monitors from before, and they're both fine but only 1000:1 contrast ration and 250 nit brightness. Thinking about biting on these at 1300:1 contrast and 400 nit brightness for $55 more each. Thank you for your reply!
9
0
0
0
Reply
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Oct 2006
L6: Expert
1,824 Posts
270 Reputation
#13
Quote from quacktastic
:
Fair enough, the difference in price for me would be enough to deal with the monoprice brand. I bought two of the 32" 4k monitors from before, and they're both fine but only 1000:1 contrast ration and 250 nit brightness. Thinking about biting on these at 1300:1 contrast and 400 nit brightness for $55 more each. Thank you for your reply!
Thanks for calling me out. I did not really clarify myself clearly in my original post.
12
0
0
0
Reply
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Aug 2007
Temporally unavailable
35,088 Posts
4,390 Reputation
#14
Quote from quacktastic
:
Fair enough, the difference in price for me would be enough to deal with the monoprice brand. I bought two of the 32" 4k monitors from before, and they're both fine but only 1000:1 contrast ration and 250 nit brightness. Thinking about biting on these at 1300:1 contrast and 400 nit brightness for $55 more each. Thank you for your reply!
they probably the same panel. the monoprice says it's uses a LG LM315WR1
0
0
0
0
Reply
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users
Joined Oct 2011
L2: Beginner
42 Posts
53 Reputation
#15
Quote from pidge
:
Thanks for calling me out. I did not really clarify myself clearly in my original post.
According to this site, LG is the manufacture of the Monoprice panel. The one linked has speakers on it which makes it more expensive as well. I imagine a lot of people don't need speakers on their monitor to keep the price down

http://www.panelook.com/LM315WR1-...40457.html

It's like buying Kirkland Bourbon, Knobb Creek makes it so do you really care that it doesn't say a name brand?

Every monitor has some poor reviews. The same LG monitor you linked to only has 3.5 stars on Amazon.

https://www.amazon.com/LG-31-5-LE...B06XPFKM32

:shrug:
6
0
0
2
Reply
Page 1 of 13
1
Join the Conversation
Add a Comment
 

Link Copied to Clipboard