Sony Lenses: FE 200-600mm F5.6-6.3 G OSS $1498, FE 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 GM OSS $2149, FE 20mm F1.8 G $663 & More + free s/h
$1,498.00
$1,998.00
+18Deal Score
33,388 Views
EDU pricing is for eligible Students or Educators. You can confirm Eligibility by filling out this form for Students[sheerid.com] or this form for Educators[sheerid.com]. Once verified you will receive your coupon for the Sony lenses listed below. The email address entered on the verification form does not need to be your EDU email address. You can verify your ID and get your coupon now, but it will not work on the product below until midnight
The coupon you will get will not work on the products below until Midnight 01/18 EST
Prices below will be after the coupon you receive once verifying your eligibility
Model: Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G OSS Lens for Sony E
Deal History
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
What would be the best option for photographing star alignments or such?
The shorter the focal length the better usually (to a point). While you will be using a relatively long exposure to capture as much of the star light as possible, there is a point that the earth's rotation will actually cause the stars to have trails in the photo.
IF you have a very long focal length, the stars will travel more pixels during the long exposure vs a shorter focal length. Thus, with a shorter focal length lens, you can get away with longer exposures without perceptible star trails.
Wouldn't low light not be as much of an issue if I'm doing long exposure?
The only way you can gather enough light with a "slow" lens like the 200-600 is with a tracking device that moves with the earths rotation that allows for a longer exposure.
The Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer pro pack for about 400 bucks, and it has a payload of 11 lbs. the 200-600 weighs about 5 lbs
considering the 200-600 is around 2000 bucks normally, with this sale you could get both and go nuts.
You won't get the best photography advice from a deals site. You're looking to drop $1k- $2k+ on gear! Try looking for some videos about the topic, or bouncing your question on a photography forum, and seeing what gear they recommend. Invest some time doing your research, then bring your newfound knowledge back here and make a more informed purchase.
I've been doing a bunch of research, just curious what people on here had to say, there are definitely a few people on here that know more about it than me and I'll take any advice.
The shorter the focal length the better usually (to a point). While you will be using a relatively long exposure to capture as much of the star light as possible, there is a point that the earth's rotation will actually cause the stars to have trails in the photo.
IF you have a very long focal length, the stars will travel more pixels during the long exposure vs a shorter focal length. Thus, with a shorter focal length lens, you can get away with longer exposures without perceptible star trails.
What would be the best option for photographing star alignments or such?
16-35 as it's the widest focal length if you are looking to do astrophotography.
BUT it's also an expensive lens since it's a GMaster lens. (Sony's top of the line glass and optics). If you are on a smaller budget, you can't go wrong with the 20mm (and it's actually slightly faster lens at 1.8, which means the lens will let in more light, which is a benefit when shooting at night / in the dark).
While it's a 4mm difference, it might not be materially noticeable as a beginner than having $1k more in your pocket. With the money saved, you can get yourself a good sturdy tripod which is a must with astrophotography.
66 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Find a friend or relative with an edu email and have them buy it for you? its not rocket science
The shorter the focal length the better usually (to a point). While you will be using a relatively long exposure to capture as much of the star light as possible, there is a point that the earth's rotation will actually cause the stars to have trails in the photo.
IF you have a very long focal length, the stars will travel more pixels during the long exposure vs a shorter focal length. Thus, with a shorter focal length lens, you can get away with longer exposures without perceptible star trails.
The Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer pro pack for about 400 bucks, and it has a payload of 11 lbs. the 200-600 weighs about 5 lbs
considering the 200-600 is around 2000 bucks normally, with this sale you could get both and go nuts.
I've been doing a bunch of research, just curious what people on here had to say, there are definitely a few people on here that know more about it than me and I'll take any advice.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
IF you have a very long focal length, the stars will travel more pixels during the long exposure vs a shorter focal length. Thus, with a shorter focal length lens, you can get away with longer exposures without perceptible star trails.
That sounds logical, I appreciate the info!
16-35 as it's the widest focal length if you are looking to do astrophotography.
BUT it's also an expensive lens since it's a GMaster lens. (Sony's top of the line glass and optics). If you are on a smaller budget, you can't go wrong with the 20mm (and it's actually slightly faster lens at 1.8, which means the lens will let in more light, which is a benefit when shooting at night / in the dark).
While it's a 4mm difference, it might not be materially noticeable as a beginner than having $1k more in your pocket. With the money saved, you can get yourself a good sturdy tripod which is a must with astrophotography.
Buy it from 6reentoe. I got it for $3148 which was the edu price. urlhasbeenblocked has no tax too.
Same for me too. . Will try tomorrow.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.