Amazon has
Canon Control Ring Mount EF & EF-S to EOS R Lens Adapter (2972C002) on sale from
$149.
Shipping is free.
Adorama has
Canon Control Ring Mount EF & EF-S to EOS R Lens Adapter (2972C002) on sale from
$149.
Shipping is free.
Thanks to community member
phoinix for finding this deal.
Product Details:
- Mount Adapter Allows EF/EF-S Lens Compatibility with the EOS R Camera.
- Built-in Control Ring Provides Quick Access to Camera Functions.
- Exterior Design Matched to EF Lenses.
- Dust- and Water-resistant.
- Metal Mount on Both Lens and Camera Sides Provide Rugged Flexibility.
- Includes:
- Canon Control Ring Mount Adapter EF-EOS R
- Camera Cover R-F-3
- Lens Dust Cap RF
- Soft Case
- Canon 1-Year Warranty
Top Comments
The biggest benefit is the sharpness. I have the EF 85 mm 1.4 and I bought that over the EF 85 mm 1.2 because the 1.2 was just so hard to use. The 1.2 was very slow to focus and was so hard to get consistent sharp results. The 1.4 was cheaper, faster to focus, and had IS. But the RF 85 1.2 is better in every way than the EF 85 1.4. In a high speed burst with the EF 85 1.4, I could miss focus for maybe 1 out of 4 shots such as a person walking down a runway. Sometimes as bad as 1 out of 3 or even 1 out of 2 if the lighting conditions were particularly bad. Even with the RF 85 1.2 at 1.2, I would have tack sharp images under the same conditions. It's pretty amazing. And the bokeh is just gorgeous. the 1.4 was no slouch but it's not comparable.
I could say the same with the 35 mm 1.8. corner to corner, it's sharper.
You can say that about the amazing 15-35 mm 2.8.
The RF 100 2.8 I would say it's not worth upgrading to. It's a good lens but not a noticeable upgrade.
The RF 70-200 is a practical upgrade. For one thing, it's super compact and can pack into a bag easily. Plus, you can get it into a sports stadium. For example, Dodgers Stadium has a 6" lens limit. the RF 70-200 is only 5.7 inches long. Once you pass the security, you can extend it to your heart's content.
29 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
My last EF camera was the 6D2. And using the same 85 mm 1.4 on the 6D2 produced sharper results and better focusing on my RP or R5 than on my 6D2. It actually surprised me as I thought they should produce equivalent sharpness.
The biggest benefit is the sharpness. I have the EF 85 mm 1.4 and I bought that over the EF 85 mm 1.2 because the 1.2 was just so hard to use. The 1.2 was very slow to focus and was so hard to get consistent sharp results. The 1.4 was cheaper, faster to focus, and had IS. But the RF 85 1.2 is better in every way than the EF 85 1.4. In a high speed burst with the EF 85 1.4, I could miss focus for maybe 1 out of 4 shots such as a person walking down a runway. Sometimes as bad as 1 out of 3 or even 1 out of 2 if the lighting conditions were particularly bad. Even with the RF 85 1.2 at 1.2, I would have tack sharp images under the same conditions. It's pretty amazing. And the bokeh is just gorgeous. the 1.4 was no slouch but it's not comparable.
I could say the same with the 35 mm 1.8. corner to corner, it's sharper.
You can say that about the amazing 15-35 mm 2.8.
The RF 100 2.8 I would say it's not worth upgrading to. It's a good lens but not a noticeable upgrade.
The RF 70-200 is a practical upgrade. For one thing, it's super compact and can pack into a bag easily. Plus, you can get it into a sports stadium. For example, Dodgers Stadium has a 6" lens limit. the RF 70-200 is only 5.7 inches long. Once you pass the security, you can extend it to your heart's content.
Looking to go mirrorless.
Is the eos R with this adapter good to get me started?
Thank you
Looking to go mirrorless.
Is the eos R with this adapter good to get me started?
Thank you
I had a 5DSR and a 6D, and I found the R's AF performance notably more reliable for my uses, especially for shooting people. The DR and resolution were also adequate for my uses. Depending on price ofc, I still consider the R a great camera - if you don't care for the absolute best that is.
Used to have a lot of EF glass, but I use mostly RFs now, with the RF 24-105 f/4L being notably better than the EF 24-105s, and good enough for me to sell my EF 24-70L 2.8.
Still use the adapter (this specific one) for the EF lenses I did not drop (EF-L 100-400 II, EF-L 16-35 4 IS, Sigma 85A 1.4, Sigma 150 2.8 Macro).
Looking to go mirrorless.
Is the eos R with this adapter good to get me started?
Thank you
It is notably lighter, the extra reach & compression @ 105mm are also notable, the AF works faster (i think): it is a better walk-around/all around lens and I think it fits the profile of a grip-less R better.
The new RF glass seems to be better all-around, but the prices are just too high for my use. I know I would enjoy the RF 24-70 being a stop faster and having IS "and-and-and", but the 24-105 is "good nough".
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
However, the RF 85 1.2 is just so easy to use. You can run and gun at 1.2 and still get tack sharp images. It's really one of Canon's best lenses ever.
One negative thing about the RF 70-200 is that it cannot be used with a teleconverter. All EF 70-200 lenses worked great with both the 1.4x and 2.0x teleconverters.
However, the RF 85 1.2 is just so easy to use. You can run and gun at 1.2 and still get tack sharp images. It's really one of Canon's best lenses ever.