Poll: Who Will You Vote for in 2012? (REVISED)

Quote from Xygonn : I think the (D)s actually think it would be better to run against Ron Paul than Gingrich or Romney...

a few polls have shown that Paul would have the best chance to beat Obama..I think they'd prefer to have newt

Quote from Illuminati4Hire : Fox News has already began writing the script for a potential win. Discredit, discredit, discredit. MSM.

yup...and can't wait to see what kind of questions they'll throw at him Friday.

Quote from papitosabe : a few polls have shown that Paul would have the best chance to beat Obama..I think they'd prefer to have newt

Which polls? I think I saw someone else post about a poll in Iowa showing Paul slightly leading Obama. But, that's Iowa.

Quote from Epiphyte : Which polls? I think I saw someone else post about a poll in Iowa showing Paul slightly leading Obama. But, that's Iowa.

I saw one online as well, one in the wall street journal that had him at 42%, Obama 41%...will see if I still have it.... But not certain if they were some type of Iowa poll..you may be write...msm shows have stated he doesn't have much of a shot...rush said anyone has a shot except Ron paul...

edit..yea the online polls I saw were based on Iowa, and I'm thinking the WSJ article may have been as well...I still think he'll demolish Obama, but that's obviously biased.

Quote from papitosabe : what skeletons are you speaking of? We know of the wives issues, Freddie mac thing. And I've somewhat heard of something he did as the speaker and a $300k fine. Anything else that may be coming out?

Marital Issues (Like you said)
Profiting off of Freddie Mac (Like you said)
Helped pass NAFTA/GATT as Speaker of the House, which killed America's jobs
Helped get rid of Glass-Steagall, which also hurt the economy
Praised progressive presidents over and over again, which can be seen in videos on Youtube

It really goes on and on. The man has serious issues and would be a godsend for Obama. I'd reluctantly vote for a second term over Gingrich.

In other news:

http://twitter.com/#!/ppppolls

Quote : There's actually a legitimate statistical argument that Paul would be the strongest GOP candidate against Obama, period.

Quote from papitosabe : I saw one online as well, one in the wall street journal that had him at 42%, Obama 41%...will see if I still have it.... But not certain if they were some type of Iowa poll..you may be write...msm shows have stated he doesn't have much of a shot...rush said anyone has a shot except Ron paul... edit..yea the online polls I saw were based on Iowa, and I'm thinking the WSJ article may have been as well...I still think he'll demolish Obama, but that's obviously biased.

Here's one: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-50354...nst-obama/

With the margin of error, they are statistically tied.

EDIT: Here ya go, this one is more current! http://www.desmoinesregister.com/...|Frontpage

Lame-ass poll.
No Gary Johnson (Libertarian)
No Stewart Alexander (PFP & Socialist)
No R.J. Harris (Libertarian)
No Carl Person (Libertarian)
No Danny Woodring (Independent)
No R. Lee Wrights (Libertarian)
No Jimmy McMillan (Rent Is Too Damn High Party)
No ANYTHING of significance.
The transparently facetious attempt at objectivity, by including that numbnuts Randall Terry who doesn't stand a prayer of getting a single vote, is pathetic at best.
It is a poll designed to promote the O.P.'s agenda and not a poll for any purpose OTHER THAN to promulgate some sort of PoV held by the O.P.
What that agenda is leaves me baffled, and probably the O.P. as well, as it doesn't appear very well thought-out.

The worst violation of all?
A Podium poll WITHOUT a celery option. The Mods should simply ban it and delete the thread entirely.

Quote from Anonymouse : Lame-ass poll. No Gary Johnson (Libertarian) No Stewart Alexander (PFP & Socialist) No R.J. Harris (Libertarian) No Carl Person (Libertarian) No Danny Woodring (Independent) No R. Lee Wrights (Libertarian) No Jimmy McMillan (Rent Is Too Damn High Party) No ANYTHING of significance. The transparently facetious attempt at objectivity, by including that numbnuts Randall Terry who doesn't stand a prayer of getting a single vote, is pathetic at best. It is a poll designed to promote the O.P.'s agenda and not a poll for any purpose OTHER THAN to promulgate some sort of PoV held by the O.P. What that agenda is leaves me baffled, and probably the O.P. as well, as it doesn't appear very well thought-out. The worst violation of all? A Podium poll WITHOUT a celery option. The Mods should simply ban it and delete the thread entirely.

mad bro?

Quote from papitosabe : mad bro?

No, not mad, just expressing my honest opinion on the thread.

Paul is unelectable

Quote from aero : Paul is unelectable

well, he's lasted longer than mccain, perry, bachhmann, and huntsmann, and 3 of 4 have were all frontrunners...so I'll take my chances with someone that stands up for the people, freedom, and the constitution..not someone who tramples all over it...

Quote from Anonymouse : No, not mad, just expressing my honest opinion on the thread.

no problem, i getcha... you can always click on "other" ...that way the whoever the others are can have a real long pink chart line...looks better don'tcha think?

and I have no idea where I got terry from??? wth...

Quote from aero : Paul is unelectable

Right, he's retained his Congressional seat for longer than you've been alive cause he's gangsta.

Pretty nice GOP comparison page for the main issues.

One of these things is not like the others... one of these things just isn't the same....

http://www.scribd.com/doc/8131547...ison-Sheet