|
|||||||
|
US Judge rules that Muslims have the right to assault Atheists critical of Islam or Prophet Where to start, one wonders? Freedom of Speech? Blasphemy Enforcement? Clueless Leftwing Judge that doesnt see the foolishness of creating legal precedent in defense of physical assaults against those who criticize religion or religious beliefs, but is instead beholden to Minority Victimization Politics? Last edited by EscapeVelo; 02-23-2012 at 04:31 PM.. The polls were not skewed, biased, oversampled or wrong. I was. There was no wave, no landslide, I was wrong about that too. Nate Silver is the gold standard of polling analysis.
![]() |
| 02-23-2012, 04:26 PM | |
|
|
|
I'd be surprised and appalled if there was conclusive information suggesting that the judge actually ruled the way the video implies he did. It's worth noting, however, that evidence of any crime having been committed is pretty flaky. The indictment against the Muslim man was for harassment, not assault, and if the harassment did not result in physical injury to the "victim," I can see why a judge might not be willing to support the prosecution. If the charge were assault, it would be a different story, but harassment is extremely difficult to prosecute if the defendant was provoked.
|
|
In your honest opinion, do you think a similar decision would be forthcoming if the Atheist Zombie Pope was attacked by a Catholic man? |
|
|
|
|
|
.
New information: Presiding Judge was Muslim. Listen to and read transcripts of his decision below. Judge Mark Martin Scolds Victim Who Insulted Islam [youtube.com]
Last edited by EscapeVelo; 02-23-2012 at 05:22 PM.. |
||||
|
I wish to protect Freedom of Speech from Islamic Violent Intimidation and Shariah Blasphemy Enforcement. I wish to uphold the Western Rule of Law and our Constitution.
Islam and Muslims are a major threat to these principles and our way of life. It is as simple as that. We've got a Muslim Judge directly stating that offending Muslim sensibilities is "way outside the boundries of your 1rst Amendment rights," in a ruling from the bench which exonerates the Muslim who physically assaulted a non-Muslims for breaching Muslim honor and Shariah proscriptions. Most sane Western people will be deeply disturbed by this. |
|
![]()
|
||
|
|
||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Do government have the right to install curfews on the population? and is a class war brewing? | Ryu-bom | The Podium | 7 | 10-31-2011 08:15 AM |
| Indiana Court: No right to resist illegal cop entry into home | Ryu-bom | The Podium | 416 | 05-26-2011 04:13 PM |
| Should schools have the right to restrict what students eat? | rayzac | The Podium | 54 | 04-13-2011 05:40 AM |
| Darwin, Scientism, and the Misguided Quest for Darwinian Conservatism | EscapeVelo | The Podium | 118 | 12-05-2010 08:18 PM |
| Dormant laws pose threat to Americans right to collect rainwater. | cruizerfish | The Podium | 44 | 08-04-2010 01:08 AM |