Obama team: 'Fast and Furious' documents are privileged

I would say Obama supporters are hypocrites for criticizing Bush for things they are more than willing to give Obama a free pass on.

As far as for just killing OBL, I don't think its outside the progressive's nature to support "shoot first,ask questions later. ". The is a long history of progressive initiated wars, with only a vocal small minority on the liberal side oPposing.

4. When it comes to right to life and due process, and fifth amendment, etc, I do not recall any part of the us constitution that distinguishes between citizens and non citizens. Do you?

I have been thinking on this. I think that in the United States everyone has due process. Outside the United States, only US citizens have due process.

Could you put a name to your claim, please? Knowing my reasoning for thinking that the killing of OBL was ok, give us a name, whom bush killed for which ou claim liberals criticized him.

Why would I put a name to the claim for bush if I didn't for Obama?

I think it's ridiculous that bush has a bad rap for his mid east policy while Obama has done nothing but expand it.

I think it's ridiculous that bush has a bad rap for his mid east policy while Obama has done nothing but expand it.

So some sort of irrelevant bullshit regarding war between sovereign nations. Why? We know who the enemy is. They are a nation, that can surrender. Terrorist are nothing like traditional wars. I'm sure you recognize this. You also know that the authorization to go into Iraq was different than the one for the war on terror.

Am I correct then to assume that you cannot point to a section of the us constitution for this claim?

Look, the fifth, the 14th, etc, if any, applies to people in your custody. In military actions against those in no-mans lands and not in our custody none of those applies, imo.

You want to point to the part of the constitution that gives the President power to use any military force without congressional approval?

You want to point to the part of the constitution authorizing the creation of Social Security?

You want to point to the part of the constitution authorizing regulation of non-interstate commerce for the reason that it may affect interstate commerce?

They don't exist. Yet all these things have been deemed allowed by the constitution. Extrajudicial killing of US citizens has not been tested because those who have died have been denied any court hearing or representation. This is even more frightening.

In other words, no there is no part of the constitution that says the people meant for protection are US citizens. However, that was well understood under the doctrine "The Constitution follows the Flag". In later amendments citizens and people were separated more intentionally in writing. I believe I have found the most pertinent case regarding these facts. I welcome you to find a case that supports your arguments.

You want to point to the part of the constitution that gives the President power to use any military force without congressional approval? [1]

You want to point to the part of the constitution authorizing the creation of Social Security? [2]

You want to point to the part of the constitution authorizing regulation of non-interstate commerce for the reason that it may affect interstate commerce? [3]

They don't exist. Yet all these things have been deemed allowed by the constitution. Extrajudicial killing of US citizens has not been tested because those who have died have been denied any court hearing or representation. This is even more frightening. [4]

In other words, no there is no part of the constitution that says the people meant for protection are US citizens. However, that was well understood under the doctrine "The Constitution follows the Flag". In later amendments citizens and people were separated more intentionally in writing. I believe I have found the most pertinent case regarding these facts. I welcome you to find a case that supports your arguments. [5]

I think it's ridiculous that bush has a bad rap for his mid east policy while Obama has done nothing but expand it.

It's quite sickening how many are OK with ignoring the constitution, as long as they perceive it's "their side" that's getting away with it......

As far as for just killing OBL, I don't think its outside the progressive's nature to support "shoot first,ask questions later. ". The is a long history of progressive initiated wars, with only a vocal small minority on the liberal side oPposing.