Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Popular Deal
Walmart In-Store YMMV Be Smart Get Prepared First Aid Kit 250 Piece - $5
$5.00
On clearance in store. My kit says 255 pieces including Silvex wound gel. For $5 it's a really great deal on some items to pick out for the actual outdoors; bandaids alone more than cover the cost and I use a lot of them 
https://brickseek.com/walmart-inv...u=4700499
http://www.walmart.com/ip/Be-Smar...e/47004993
https://brickseek.com/walmart-inv...u=4700499
http://www.walmart.com/ip/Be-Smar...e/47004993
Good deal?
You gave thanks to illegal_alien for this post.
Thank you!
illegal_alien posted this deal. Say thanks!
Thank you!
illegal_alien posted this deal. Say thanks!
Created 03-02-2021
at 05:03 PM
by illegal_alien
in
Medical Supplies
(5)
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
About the OP
Recommended Deal Alerts For You
What are Deal Alerts?
Want more deals like this?
Create a deal alert for Medical Supplies.
Add Deal Alert for Medical Supplies
34 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
If you don't open, you don't see. Simple.
The same story of starkly different policies and similar outcomes emerges from a comparison of Texas and California, the two most populous states. While California Gov. Gavin Newsom ordered a new lockdown on December 3, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott did not impose new restrictions, and the state remained largely open. Yet since mid-January, the two states have seen almost the same drop in the seven-day average of newly reported cases, which has fallen by 85 percent in California and 81 percent in Texas.
Notwithstanding its much stricter regulations, California saw a bigger increase in new infections during December and January, when the seven-day average tripled. In Texas during the same period, the average doubled. Nationwide in the United States, the average rose 50 percent. In the U.K., it quadrupled.
Since politicians are more inclined to impose restrictions when they see infections rising dramatically, it is not surprising that Johnson and Newsom decided new lockdowns were necessary. But on the face of it, those policies, despite the economic and social costs they entailed, were not actually necessary to bring case numbers back down. Since jurisdictions that took a much looser approach saw similar declines around the same time, it seems official commands do not play as important a role in reducing the spread of COVID-19 as many politicians imagine.