Category: Neutral Cushioned Intended for runners who have a higher, more stable arch that does not pronate excessively (roll inwards) or may even supinate (roll outwards).
Neutral Cushioned shoes offer very little or no structure or pronation support and are generally more flexible than stability shoes.
Runners who require a neutral shoe tend to notice more excessive wear on the lateral (outside) side of the soles of their running shoes. Neutral shoes can vary from lightweight and minimal cushioning to maximum levels of cushioning depending on the needs and preferences of the runner.
Runners with high/stable arches tend to notice pain on the outside(lateral side) of their shins and knees and may also battle plantar fasciitis if not wearing a neutral cushioned shoe.
About This Deal:
This price is $4.00 less than same previous popular Frontpage Deal
Community Notes
This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Category: Neutral Cushioned Intended for runners who have a higher, more stable arch that does not pronate excessively (roll inwards) or may even supinate (roll outwards).
Neutral Cushioned shoes offer very little or no structure or pronation support and are generally more flexible than stability shoes.
Runners who require a neutral shoe tend to notice more excessive wear on the lateral (outside) side of the soles of their running shoes. Neutral shoes can vary from lightweight and minimal cushioning to maximum levels of cushioning depending on the needs and preferences of the runner.
Runners with high/stable arches tend to notice pain on the outside(lateral side) of their shins and knees and may also battle plantar fasciitis if not wearing a neutral cushioned shoe.
About This Deal:
This price is $4.00 less than same previous popular Frontpage Deal
I bought the 680 model in March of 2020 for $29, and recently tried the 880s on at a local store. I honestly can't tell the difference in how they feel. The mark up on these is insane… better to get some brooks or hokas for these prices.
I bought the 680 model in March of 2020 for $29, and recently tried the 880s on at a local store. I honestly can't tell the difference in how they feel. The mark up on these is insane… better to get some brooks or hokas for these prices.
Agreed. I went from the 880 to the 680 after they wore out. 680 feels the same; same cushioning, same fit. The 680s are priced much more reasonably. I think the only difference is the 880s have a special knit upper, while the 680s have a mesh upper.
Agreed. I went from the 880 to the 680 after they wore out. 680 feels the same; same cushioning, same fit. The 680s are priced much more reasonably. I think the only difference is the 880s have a special knit upper, while the 680s have a mesh upper
If you're comparing 880v9's to 680v6's, then I completely disagree and this is also factually incorrect for that comparison. Cannot comment on these Fresh Foam v10s vs. 680v6's.
I have run in only New Balance for 28 years and am very familiar with their 6XX and 8XX lines and particularly and 680 and 880s having also purchased 680 series shoes from Amazon at $29 and change like many over the years like many others have since imho they are the best deal in running shoes. They fall down with poor forefoot cushioning and cannot stand up to higher mileage. Past about 7 miles, my 39 year old body feels it.
The 880v9s have much better forefoot cushioning and while lively, they also feel more cushioned as a whole. I don't mind a lively ride but wanted a lighter, neutral cushioning shoe I could reliably and comfortably run 8 or more miles in. The 880v9 was perfect for that and at $39.99 from Slickdeals (cannot remember vendor), stupid cheap. I still have a new pair waiting to get put into the rotation.
I'm curious if you're comparing the 880v10s because I've been extremely hesitant to try FreshFoam. Seems like a way to use less technology, cheaper materials and increase margin and I wouldn't be surprised if these aren't any better than 680v6's, the latter of which aren't extremely well cushioned but at the prices we paid, a great deal for the money for a middle-of-the road, lighter training shoe.
If you're comparing 880v9's to 680v6's, then I completely disagree and this is also factually incorrect for that comparison. Cannot comment on these Fresh Foam v10s vs. 680v6's.
I have run in only New Balance for 28 years and am very familiar with their 6XX and 8XX lines and particularly and 680 and 880s having also purchased 680 series shoes from Amazon at $29 and change like many over the years like many others have since imho they are the best deal in running shoes. They fall down with poor forefoot cushioning and cannot stand up to higher mileage. Past about 7 miles, my 39 year old body feels it.
The 880v9s have much better forefoot cushioning and while lively, they also feel more cushioned as a whole. I don't mind a lively ride but wanted a lighter, neutral cushioning shoe I could reliably and comfortably run 8 or more miles in. The 880v9 was perfect for that and at $39.99 from Slickdeals (cannot remember vendor), stupid cheap. I still have a new pair waiting to get put into the rotation.
I'm curious if you're comparing the 880v10s because I've been extremely hesitant to try FreshFoam. Seems like a way to use less technology, cheaper materials and increase margin and I wouldn't be surprised if these aren't any better than 680v6's, the latter of which aren't extremely well cushioned but at the prices we paid, a great deal for the money for a middle-of-the road, lighter training shoe.
It was the 880v9 purchased and worn in 2019, then switched to 680v6. Looking at them side by side, they look very similar structurally. The 680v6 is a well cushioned shoe for the price (i.e., not just a casual shoe). I am a heel striker, so that may explain our different experiences with the 680s.
Typically with New Balance, it has been my experience that a shoe number less than 600 (i.e., 500 or less) can't really be worn for serious running.
The 680s were about $50 less than the new 880, and since they looked similar, I rolled the dice and it worked out for me.
The back of.these shoes, the material that wraps around your heels. Is too short! Feels like you can step out of them. Trash shoes. I've bought tons of nb shoes and the quality is very average. I would buy these for yard work/ walking and only for $30.
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
It was the 880v9 purchased and worn in 2019, then switched to 680v6. Looking at them side by side, they look very similar structurally. The 680v6 is a well cushioned shoe for the price (i.e., not just a casual shoe). I am a heel striker, so that may explain our different experiences with the 680s.
Typically with New Balance, it has been my experience that a shoe number less than 600 (i.e., 500 or less) can't really be worn for serious running.
The 680s were about $50 less than the new 880, and since they looked similar, I rolled the dice and it worked out for me.
Totally agree on series. I've found the 880s to have a much softer ride, especially in the forefoot. I heel strike but not a lot. Either way, two good shoes but the 680s at half this price are the better deal to be sure.
Agreed - none of the SD deals for New Balances in the 4xx-5xx series for $29-39 are deals! They are the lowest end you can buy and the type you'd see in Sears - no bueno at all.
17 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
also, 5% back with chase freedom right now
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I have run in only New Balance for 28 years and am very familiar with their 6XX and 8XX lines and particularly and 680 and 880s having also purchased 680 series shoes from Amazon at $29 and change like many over the years like many others have since imho they are the best deal in running shoes. They fall down with poor forefoot cushioning and cannot stand up to higher mileage. Past about 7 miles, my 39 year old body feels it.
The 880v9s have much better forefoot cushioning and while lively, they also feel more cushioned as a whole. I don't mind a lively ride but wanted a lighter, neutral cushioning shoe I could reliably and comfortably run 8 or more miles in. The 880v9 was perfect for that and at $39.99 from Slickdeals (cannot remember vendor), stupid cheap. I still have a new pair waiting to get put into the rotation.
I'm curious if you're comparing the 880v10s because I've been extremely hesitant to try FreshFoam. Seems like a way to use less technology, cheaper materials and increase margin and I wouldn't be surprised if these aren't any better than 680v6's, the latter of which aren't extremely well cushioned but at the prices we paid, a great deal for the money for a middle-of-the road, lighter training shoe.
was anyone here able to snag a pair?
I have run in only New Balance for 28 years and am very familiar with their 6XX and 8XX lines and particularly and 680 and 880s having also purchased 680 series shoes from Amazon at $29 and change like many over the years like many others have since imho they are the best deal in running shoes. They fall down with poor forefoot cushioning and cannot stand up to higher mileage. Past about 7 miles, my 39 year old body feels it.
The 880v9s have much better forefoot cushioning and while lively, they also feel more cushioned as a whole. I don't mind a lively ride but wanted a lighter, neutral cushioning shoe I could reliably and comfortably run 8 or more miles in. The 880v9 was perfect for that and at $39.99 from Slickdeals (cannot remember vendor), stupid cheap. I still have a new pair waiting to get put into the rotation.
I'm curious if you're comparing the 880v10s because I've been extremely hesitant to try FreshFoam. Seems like a way to use less technology, cheaper materials and increase margin and I wouldn't be surprised if these aren't any better than 680v6's, the latter of which aren't extremely well cushioned but at the prices we paid, a great deal for the money for a middle-of-the road, lighter training shoe.
Typically with New Balance, it has been my experience that a shoe number less than 600 (i.e., 500 or less) can't really be worn for serious running.
The 680s were about $50 less than the new 880, and since they looked similar, I rolled the dice and it worked out for me.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Typically with New Balance, it has been my experience that a shoe number less than 600 (i.e., 500 or less) can't really be worn for serious running.
The 680s were about $50 less than the new 880, and since they looked similar, I rolled the dice and it worked out for me.
Agreed - none of the SD deals for New Balances in the 4xx-5xx series for $29-39 are deals! They are the lowest end you can buy and the type you'd see in Sears - no bueno at all.