Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands or deals, including promoted items.
Sorry, this deal has expired. Get notified of deals like this in the future. Add Deal Alert for this Item
Popular

New Balance Men's or Women's 880v10 Running Shoes $68.98 + Free S/H

$68.98
$149.99
+16 Deal Score
41,315 Views
About This Item:
  • Surface: Road, Gyms, Flats
  • Category: Neutral Cushioned Intended for runners who have a higher, more stable arch that does not pronate excessively (roll inwards) or may even supinate (roll outwards).
  • Neutral Cushioned shoes offer very little or no structure or pronation support and are generally more flexible than stability shoes.
  • Runners who require a neutral shoe tend to notice more excessive wear on the lateral (outside) side of the soles of their running shoes. Neutral shoes can vary from lightweight and minimal cushioning to maximum levels of cushioning depending on the needs and preferences of the runner.
  • Runners with high/stable arches tend to notice pain on the outside(lateral side) of their shins and knees and may also battle plantar fasciitis if not wearing a neutral cushioned shoe.
About This Deal:
  • This price is $4.00 less than same previous popular Frontpage Deal
Good Deal?
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
Deal
Score
+16
41,315 Views
$68.98
$149.99

Your comment cannot be blank.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Jan 2015
L2: Beginner
> bubble2 61 Posts
62 Reputation
jessedh
10-08-2021 at 04:32 PM.
10-08-2021 at 04:32 PM.
Seems like a lot of sizes are available
2
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jan 2017
L2: Beginner
> bubble2 76 Posts
14 Reputation
bdobslaw
10-09-2021 at 06:35 AM.
10-09-2021 at 06:35 AM.
Quote from jessedh :
Seems like a lot of sizes are available
They went quick then cause not now Frown
5
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Mar 2020
L4: Apprentice
> bubble2 440 Posts
60 Reputation
GreenHill9156
10-09-2021 at 07:18 AM.
10-09-2021 at 07:18 AM.
I don't know why Jackrabbit even bothers with a width selector on their product pages, since they only ever have regular width available.
4
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jan 2013
L3: Novice
> bubble2 200 Posts
18 Reputation
MMOBLEY
10-09-2021 at 11:16 AM.
10-09-2021 at 11:16 AM.
Are these any good for casual training?
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Nov 2010
L3: Novice
> bubble2 129 Posts
42 Reputation
Axlrose2001
10-09-2021 at 11:19 AM.
10-09-2021 at 11:19 AM.
FYI- No free returns.
3
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jan 2014
L6: Expert
> bubble2 1,119 Posts
747 Reputation
kellybrf
10-09-2021 at 11:34 AM.
10-09-2021 at 11:34 AM.
Quote from Axlrose2001 :
FYI- No free returns.

if you PayPal they will reimburse you shipping costs up to $30, 12 times per year.https://www.paypal.com/us/webapps/mpp/returns

also, 5% back with chase freedom right now
11
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined May 2012
L5: Journeyman
> bubble2 1,256 Posts
63 Reputation
nova_and_onyx
10-09-2021 at 11:44 AM.
10-09-2021 at 11:44 AM.
damn the goretex oos. would of been a deal.
2
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Dec 2009
L4: Apprentice
> bubble2 482 Posts
105 Reputation
pbandnv
10-09-2021 at 11:55 AM.
10-09-2021 at 11:55 AM.
I bought the 680 model in March of 2020 for $29, and recently tried the 880s on at a local store. I honestly can't tell the difference in how they feel. The mark up on these is insane… better to get some brooks or hokas for these prices.
1
2
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Nov 2011
Cassius in the house.
> bubble2 158 Posts
118 Reputation
cassius1999
10-09-2021 at 12:27 PM.
10-09-2021 at 12:27 PM.
Quote from pbandnv :
I bought the 680 model in March of 2020 for $29, and recently tried the 880s on at a local store. I honestly can't tell the difference in how they feel. The mark up on these is insane… better to get some brooks or hokas for these prices.
Agreed. I went from the 880 to the 680 after they wore out. 680 feels the same; same cushioning, same fit. The 680s are priced much more reasonably. I think the only difference is the 880s have a special knit upper, while the 680s have a mesh upper.
2
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Oct 2021
L5: Journeyman
> bubble2 591 Posts
157 Reputation
BackFromTheDead21
10-09-2021 at 01:24 PM.
10-09-2021 at 01:24 PM.
Quote :
Quote from cassius1999 :
Agreed. I went from the 880 to the 680 after they wore out. 680 feels the same; same cushioning, same fit. The 680s are priced much more reasonably. I think the only difference is the 880s have a special knit upper, while the 680s have a mesh upper
If you're comparing 880v9's to 680v6's, then I completely disagree and this is also factually incorrect for that comparison. Cannot comment on these Fresh Foam v10s vs. 680v6's.

I have run in only New Balance for 28 years and am very familiar with their 6XX and 8XX lines and particularly and 680 and 880s having also purchased 680 series shoes from Amazon at $29 and change like many over the years like many others have since imho they are the best deal in running shoes. They fall down with poor forefoot cushioning and cannot stand up to higher mileage. Past about 7 miles, my 39 year old body feels it.

The 880v9s have much better forefoot cushioning and while lively, they also feel more cushioned as a whole. I don't mind a lively ride but wanted a lighter, neutral cushioning shoe I could reliably and comfortably run 8 or more miles in. The 880v9 was perfect for that and at $39.99 from Slickdeals (cannot remember vendor), stupid cheap. I still have a new pair waiting to get put into the rotation.

I'm curious if you're comparing the 880v10s because I've been extremely hesitant to try FreshFoam. Seems like a way to use less technology, cheaper materials and increase margin and I wouldn't be surprised if these aren't any better than 680v6's, the latter of which aren't extremely well cushioned but at the prices we paid, a great deal for the money for a middle-of-the road, lighter training shoe.
5
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Apr 2021
L3: Novice
> bubble2 191 Posts
14 Reputation
Ilker2000
10-09-2021 at 06:03 PM.
10-09-2021 at 06:03 PM.
Quote from GreenHill9156 :
I don't know why Jackrabbit even bothers with a width selector on their product pages, since they only ever have regular width available.

It is always a challenge to find extra wide shoes.
2
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined May 2013
L6: Expert
> bubble2 1,729 Posts
110 Reputation
liunit92
10-09-2021 at 06:29 PM.
10-09-2021 at 06:29 PM.
Quote from nova_and_onyx :
damn the goretex oos. would of been a deal.
for real though.

was anyone here able to snag a pair?
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Nov 2011
Cassius in the house.
> bubble2 158 Posts
118 Reputation
cassius1999
10-09-2021 at 10:14 PM.
10-09-2021 at 10:14 PM.
Quote from BackFromTheDead21 :
If you're comparing 880v9's to 680v6's, then I completely disagree and this is also factually incorrect for that comparison. Cannot comment on these Fresh Foam v10s vs. 680v6's.

I have run in only New Balance for 28 years and am very familiar with their 6XX and 8XX lines and particularly and 680 and 880s having also purchased 680 series shoes from Amazon at $29 and change like many over the years like many others have since imho they are the best deal in running shoes. They fall down with poor forefoot cushioning and cannot stand up to higher mileage. Past about 7 miles, my 39 year old body feels it.

The 880v9s have much better forefoot cushioning and while lively, they also feel more cushioned as a whole. I don't mind a lively ride but wanted a lighter, neutral cushioning shoe I could reliably and comfortably run 8 or more miles in. The 880v9 was perfect for that and at $39.99 from Slickdeals (cannot remember vendor), stupid cheap. I still have a new pair waiting to get put into the rotation.

I'm curious if you're comparing the 880v10s because I've been extremely hesitant to try FreshFoam. Seems like a way to use less technology, cheaper materials and increase margin and I wouldn't be surprised if these aren't any better than 680v6's, the latter of which aren't extremely well cushioned but at the prices we paid, a great deal for the money for a middle-of-the road, lighter training shoe.
It was the 880v9 purchased and worn in 2019, then switched to 680v6. Looking at them side by side, they look very similar structurally. The 680v6 is a well cushioned shoe for the price (i.e., not just a casual shoe). I am a heel striker, so that may explain our different experiences with the 680s.

Typically with New Balance, it has been my experience that a shoe number less than 600 (i.e., 500 or less) can't really be worn for serious running.

The 680s were about $50 less than the new 880, and since they looked similar, I rolled the dice and it worked out for me.
3
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jun 2020
L3: Novice
> bubble2 125 Posts
14 Reputation
hose1989
10-10-2021 at 08:31 AM.
10-10-2021 at 08:31 AM.
The back of.these shoes, the material that wraps around your heels. Is too short! Feels like you can step out of them. Trash shoes. I've bought tons of nb shoes and the quality is very average. I would buy these for yard work/ walking and only for $30.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Page 1 of 2
Start the Conversation
 

More Men's Shoes Deals & Discounts

Link Copied

The link has been copied to the clipboard.