Original Post
Written by
Edited August 31, 2022
at 03:53 PM
by
AI-Direct via Amazon [amazon.com] has
3-Pack (6.6'/6.6'/10') Ainope USB-C to USB-C 100W Nylon Braided Cable (Right Angle, Grey) for $17.99 - 5% off when you clip the coupon on the product page - $5.04 off when you apply promo code
28JGGUBR at checkout =
$12.05.
Shipping is free w/ Prime or on orders $25+. >
clippable 5% coupon is NLA, now $12.95 after coupon code
Note: Coupons are usually limited to one per account.
69 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
So in these longer USB-C cables intended for power, they use thicker wires for power combined with thinner wires for data, in order to keep the total cable thickness down. That means a cable capable of carrying 100W won't be able to hit high data speeds, and vice versa. Unless you're willing to cope with a much thicker cable (which is harder to coil). Likewise, a USB-C cable capable of multi-gigabit Thunderbolt speeds, won't be able to transmit as much power (unless it's really short or thick).
(There's also (4) Voltage. The higher voltage you use, the less loss there is. But most specs fix the voltage so it's typically not something you can vary. However, it is possible to boost the voltage, send it over a thin cable with less loss, then drop the voltage again to match the input voltage. The Redmere HDMI cables did this so you could have longer cables without needing them to be ridiculously thick.)
And no, extension cords can't all carry 110V. If it's made of 16 gauge wire, the 110V usually drops to about 95-100 V after 50 ft. That's low enough that sensitive devices won't work. Not to mention if the device you plug in is drawing 1000W, then the extension cord is heating up by over 100W and the casing will probably melt after a few minutes. If you instead use, say 12gauge (thicker) wire it usually maintains about 105-108 V.
That's not really the cable's fault. Because USB didn't set a standard for fast charging, manufacturers came up with all sorts of tricks to add fast charge capability. A favorite one was to make the USB connector a little longer than standard, add extra pins further inside the connector. So if you plugged the manufacturer's cable into the manufacturer's adapter, these extra pins would be connected and allowed the device to fast charge. But if you used a regular cable or regular adapter, these extra pins don't connect or don't exist, and there's no way to fast charge.
Incidentally, USB-C PD (power delivery) is a standard where the device and charger can negotiate a voltage. Higher power devices request a higher voltage, allowing the adapter to deliver more power over the same thickness cable. For this reason, I think it's the first DC power standard which has a good chance to (finally) supplant the ubiquitous 12V cigarette adapter.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank MrStealYourHamster
Yeah, it's the theoretical limit on USB 2.0. usually it's closer to 450 in real life tho assuming no other bottlenecks.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank schnoid
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank MxxC
USB-C is just a physical connector spec, not wires inside of a cable.
With these garbage cheap cables NEVER assume it's usb3.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
This is just a shill post from trash brand
This is just a shill post from trash brand
Bought one last year,well built, has good shielding, despite usb 2.0, they are solid charging cables.
USB-C is just a physical connector spec, not wires inside of a cable.
With these garbage cheap cables NEVER assume it's usb3.
Some say data is one thing, charging is another, but some of these charge horribly slow too. Since then I stopped buying no-name cables.
Some say data is one thing, charging is another, but some of these charge horribly slow too. Since then I stopped buying no-name cables.
But at the same time, again, USB-C is just a connector spec, just like USB-A, USB-B, mini and micro USB. It just happened that USB3 came out at about the same time as USB-C.
And since all USB protocols are(should be) backwards and forwards compatible, cheapo mft can make -C cables that are only up to spec of USB2 or worse.
Ultimately, I agree, they should've somehow found a way to ensure that USB-C cables must be compatible with USB3 protocol
* USB-C to USB-C
* 10ft
* USB 3.0
* 60w+
* 90-degree angle on at least one end
* extended 90-degree head for thick phone cases
This product should exist, but I can't find it. Amazon's garbage search engine ignores filtering and keeps showing listings that don't fit the criteria.