Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expired Posted by Weejie • Jan 25, 2023
expired Posted by Weejie • Jan 25, 2023

Costco Members: New Mac Studio Desktop: Apple M1 Max Chip, 32 GB RAM, 512GB SSD

+ Free Shipping

$1,700

$1,950

12% off
Costco Wholesale
135 Comments 80,753 Views
Visit Retailer
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Costco Wholesale has for their Members: New Mac Studio Desktop: Apple M1 Max Chip (MJMV3LL/A) on sale for $1699.99. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Community Member Weejie for finding this deal.

Note: You need to be an active Costco Member and signed in to your account to purchase at sale price, otherwise non-members may purchase but are subject to a 5% surcharge.

Specs:
  • Apple M1 Max Chip
    • 10-core CPU with 8 performance cores and 2 efficiency cores
    • 24-core GPU
    • 16-core Neural Engine
    • 400GB/s memory bandwidth
  • 32GB RAM (Unified Memory)
  • 512GB Solid State Drive
  • Built-in speaker
  • Bluetooth 5.0
  • Wi-Fi (802.11ax Wi-Fi 6 wireless networking) (IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac compatible)
  • macOS Monterey
  • Ports:
    • 3.5 mm headphone jack
    • HDMI port (supports multichannel audio output)
    • 4x Thunderbolt 4 (up to 40Gb/s)
    • 2x USB-A
    • 10Gb Ethernet
    • 2x USB-C Ports (Front)
    • SDXC Card Slot (UHS-II)
  • 7.7-inch-square, 3.7-inch-tall design in silver

Editor's Notes

Written by StrawMan86 | Staff
  • About this deal:
    • Valid through 1/31/2023, or while supplies last.
    • This price is $250 less (13% savings) than the listed retail price for this configuration.
  • About this product:
    • 4.8 out of 5 stars rating at Costco based on over 55 customer reviews
  • About this store:
    • You can view Costco's Return Policy here.
  • Additional Note:
    • Please refer to the Forum Thread for additional discussion regarding this deal.

Original Post

Written by Weejie
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Costco Wholesale has for their Members: New Mac Studio Desktop: Apple M1 Max Chip (MJMV3LL/A) on sale for $1699.99. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Community Member Weejie for finding this deal.

Note: You need to be an active Costco Member and signed in to your account to purchase at sale price, otherwise non-members may purchase but are subject to a 5% surcharge.

Specs:
  • Apple M1 Max Chip
    • 10-core CPU with 8 performance cores and 2 efficiency cores
    • 24-core GPU
    • 16-core Neural Engine
    • 400GB/s memory bandwidth
  • 32GB RAM (Unified Memory)
  • 512GB Solid State Drive
  • Built-in speaker
  • Bluetooth 5.0
  • Wi-Fi (802.11ax Wi-Fi 6 wireless networking) (IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac compatible)
  • macOS Monterey
  • Ports:
    • 3.5 mm headphone jack
    • HDMI port (supports multichannel audio output)
    • 4x Thunderbolt 4 (up to 40Gb/s)
    • 2x USB-A
    • 10Gb Ethernet
    • 2x USB-C Ports (Front)
    • SDXC Card Slot (UHS-II)
  • 7.7-inch-square, 3.7-inch-tall design in silver

Editor's Notes

Written by StrawMan86 | Staff
  • About this deal:
    • Valid through 1/31/2023, or while supplies last.
    • This price is $250 less (13% savings) than the listed retail price for this configuration.
  • About this product:
    • 4.8 out of 5 stars rating at Costco based on over 55 customer reviews
  • About this store:
    • You can view Costco's Return Policy here.
  • Additional Note:
    • Please refer to the Forum Thread for additional discussion regarding this deal.

Original Post

Written by Weejie

Community Voting

Deal Score
+42
Good Deal
Visit Retailer

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Top Comments

ptoro
31 Posts
14 Reputation
Not a good deal. This price is the same as the 32 GB Mac Mini M2 Pro, which has better or the same specs in almost every area as this Mac Studio.

As mentioned the M2 Pro CPUs are faster than the M1 Max's. But also the Wi-Fi is better (6e on the Mini vs. 6 on the Studio) and so is the the Bluetooth (5.3 on the Mini vs. 5.0 on the Studio).

The only reason to get this deal is if you don't care about CPU performance as much as you care about GPU. The Mac Studio M1 Max's GPU performance is better in benchmarks (likely due to the M1 Max's 12 GPU cores vs. the M2 Pro's 10). The only other differences between the two machines is the Studio has 2 additional USB-C ports and an SD card reader on the front.
munkle
1650 Posts
303 Reputation
Not really, Microsoft and most Linux distros beat Apple easily on supporting older hardware. Apple is all over the board on how long they support their macs some get dropped quickly, some as soon as 3 years. The average appears to be around 8ish years before Apple won't update them anymore which isnt great compared to either windows or Linux. Microsoft actively updates all of my computers from 2013 and looking at their support docs they plan to do so until 2025, 4 years longer than Apple's average. Windows 8 just barely ended support 2 weeks ago, it came out in 2012. It's a guess when apple will drop support while Microsoft clearly defines how long it will support it's products.

On the phone side, apple is unparalleled, on the computer side they are not a leader at all. 8 years used to be a lot but computers and even phones now days last much longer than before. If you upgrade more often than 8 years you'll probably be fine but I have quite a few friends and family using computers over 8 years old.

You can look here and see the Mac os compatibility with older macs: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacOS

You'll notice macos 13 doesn't officially support anything older than 2017. Which isn't that old. It's also not the same year for every Mac either, some are supported longer than others.

Apple only recently started releasing security updates for older os versions and even with that they only go two years back and they don't support it the same as their current version. You can read more about that here: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2...-of-macos/

If you want a really detailed article on Mac os updates and how long you'll get them you can read one here: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2...a-problem/

Tldr: don't expect more than 8 years of updates and that isn't class leading at all.
CheaperMoFo
307 Posts
217 Reputation
You've also omitted some key advantages of the Studio. First, the M1 Max chip has roughly doubly the memory bandwidth of the M2 Pro. This is significant for RAM-intensive tasks, like 3D animation and high resolution film & video editing. And for that customer base, those extra front ports are important--they're constantly taking raw footage in and processing it.

Second, you omitted that the Studio comes with a 10Gb Ethernet port, which again matters when you are moving enormous video files around a LAN (the better WifFi on the M2 Pro doesn't come close to those speeds!). That option is an additional $100 more, and added 2 weeks of additional lead time on a BTO the M2 Pro Mini. So your price comparison ("the price is the same") is actually off by $100 for this Studio, which is cheaper than a comparably equipped (32GB/512GB/10GbE) M2 Pro Mini.

Finally, Apple does tend to support its professional machines (like the Studio) longer than its consumer (ie M2 Mini) and "pro-sumer" lines (which is where I'd place the M2 Pro Mini). When you've got a customer base that can and will spend up to $56K for video editing machines (the old Intel Mac Pro), you support those companies. I'm curious to see how the next iterations of the Studio and Pro product lines roll out over the rest of the year.

While I'd agree that these machines are roughly comparable in many ways IMO, there's no question that if you are a professional video editor or film animator the Studio is the better machine. For the rest of us schlubs though... it's mostly a wash in terms of performance for the price. There are plusses and minuses.

So I don't agree that this is a "not a good deal", even though I'm slightly inclined to go with the M2 Pro mainly because it is a bit more power efficient, plus the form factor (other than no front ports), and the slightly newer processor. In my use case, the 32GB RAM and the better RAM bandwidth would probably matter mostly when running virtual machines. But as I want at least 1TB fast SSD storage (external TB4 enclosures with NVME4 SSDs capable of comparable speeds to the internal SSD actually cost even more than Apple's expensive pricing!), I'll probably end up with a BTO of one or the other at an even higher price point.

But at this price the Studio is worth a look and is a tempting alternative. Too bad Citibank & Costco stopped offering the 4-year extended warranty protection plan last week though, or that might have tipped the scales in favor of the Studio for me.

134 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jan 26, 2023
44 Posts
Joined Dec 2016
Jan 26, 2023
lucky_luke
Jan 26, 2023
44 Posts
Why did you said "$300 less than Apple"?
Apple has the same configuration at $1999
2
Jan 26, 2023
1,951 Posts
Joined Apr 2006
Jan 26, 2023
ratbastard
Jan 26, 2023
1,951 Posts

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank ratbastard

Quote from spacemoth :
One other consideration is the SSD speed on the M2 and M2 Pro minis seems to be lower than the Studio, or even the M1 mini.

The M2 Pro 512 SSD Mini speed is about 3,000 MB/s (2x256 SSD nand chips), while the M1 Max 512 SSD Studio speed is around 5,000 MB/s.

Not that it will necessarily be noticeable in day-to-day use, but it is an area where the Studio is better than the M2 Pro mini.
This SSD decision by Apple is really a misstep. Yes, most people won't notice the difference if you have at least 16gb RAM (swap), but the cost savings for them is not worth it. They have a huge profit margin compared to other manufacturers. It seems like no M2 storage configuration is as fast as any M1 series. How can you justify the 40% speed decrease with "only some of you will notice?" Meanwhile, their whole mobile CPU lineup is focused on giving people more processing power than they need.
1
2
Pro
Jan 26, 2023
2,928 Posts
Joined Nov 2005
Jan 26, 2023
BrainDoc
Pro
Jan 26, 2023
2,928 Posts
Quote from lucky_luke :
Why did you said "$300 less than Apple"?
Apple has the same configuration at $1999
$1999 - $300 is $1699. That's $300 less than Apple's price (unless you get the education price, which is $1800 so buying from Costco saves another $100).
Jan 26, 2023
1,383 Posts
Joined Jan 2015
Jan 26, 2023
Deal_Hunter_X
Jan 26, 2023
1,383 Posts
Quote from chi :
M2 Pro > M1 Max. But this has more Ram at 32gb if you need it.
Quite the opposite if you are a heavy video editing user. Plus M2 Pro won't get the max SSD speed unless you opt for 1TB, anything less than 1TB only gets half of M1 Max's speed.
Last edited by Deal_Hunter_X January 26, 2023 at 06:25 AM.
1
1
Pro
Jan 26, 2023
5,751 Posts
Joined Dec 2007
Jan 26, 2023
un_plug
Pro
Jan 26, 2023
5,751 Posts
Quote from ratbastard :
This SSD decision by Apple is really a misstep. Yes, most people won't notice the difference if you have at least 16gb RAM (swap), but the cost savings for them is not worth it. They have a huge profit margin compared to other manufacturers. It seems like no M2 storage configuration is as fast as any M1 series. How can you justify the 40% speed decrease with "only some of you will notice?" Meanwhile, their whole mobile CPU lineup is focused on giving people more processing power than they need.
This is what really burns me about Apple's latest SSD move when it comes to the M2 Air and Mini. As you said Apple already has a huge profit margin, and to go backwards and nickel and dime over a small 256GB, to install an inferior 256GB than last gen to save a few cents- come on man.
I had been holding out waiting for the 2nd gen of M chip Mac Mini, and was willing to swallow the inflated upcharge for 16GB RAM, but was planning on being fine with 256GB- would be for applications and scratch disk only- already have two Samsung T7 2TB drives for files and back up (thanks to SD). But now I may have spend another $200 for faster 512. That is more than what I paid for the two T7s!
1
Jan 26, 2023
4,085 Posts
Joined Oct 2004
Jan 26, 2023
mrstangblb
Jan 26, 2023
4,085 Posts
I'm keeping my eyes open to see if they come out with the M2 in the Studio somewhere around March. I had seen that rumored somewhere, so I'm going to wait.
3
Jan 26, 2023
1,085 Posts
Joined Feb 2009
Jan 26, 2023
spec2
Jan 26, 2023
1,085 Posts
Quote from MrSchmo :
Do all Mac computers have the same length of OS support? I don't want to get a top of the line, if the lesser models get around the same years of updates...
Don't buy "top of the line" - which this one is not, more like middle of the line, if you don't need the features it's offers, mainly the additional ports not available on the Mini or iMac. OS Support, to some amount, is also a non-consideration. For example, I haven't bothered to upgrade my Macs to Venture yet because it offers me nothing I need, no s/w or hardware I own requires it. I'll probably wait for Mac OS 14.2 or 3 before I upgrade.

Also I have a 2012 mini that I use only as a music server. This model hasn't been supported by Apple for a couple years at least. Still has iTunes! Works fine networking w/ my other Macs and iDevices with the iOS Remote app.

So Fiigure out what you need in a computer and go from there. Don't spend more than you need to get the features you want because all CE becomes basically obsolete in 6 years, manufacturer support or not.

But to answer your question, yes, basically Apple offers Mac OS updates for 5-6 years after release, sometime a bit less, sometimes a bit more.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jan 26, 2023
230 Posts
Joined Jul 2014
Jan 26, 2023
abillmann
Jan 26, 2023
230 Posts
Never realized SD cards were such a big deal that they warrant a front-facing slot. Huh.
3
Jan 26, 2023
1,085 Posts
Joined Feb 2009
Jan 26, 2023
spec2
Jan 26, 2023
1,085 Posts
Quote from un_plug :
to go backwards and nickel and dime over a small 256GB, to install an inferior 256GB than last gen to save a few cents- come on man.
I don't think it's first about saving a few pennies, but rather creating a bigger wedge between entry model and the one's above it. Apple's business model is the upsell. It has a long history of making an entry level product at an attractive charge to get people "considering," but then gimping to once they are ready to buy they spend of few bucks more. I remember in the HDD days there was an upcharge in MacBook Pro models for a 7200 RPM drive. And 7200 RPM wasn't even available in the MacBook. Of course in those days it was easy to crack the case and install your own drive.

But really, for entry level buyers even the slower SSD in the M2 models is worlds faster than what Apple offered in entry level Intel products. The M2 models are still the best Apple has offered for price even with the slower SSD speed.
Jan 26, 2023
1,085 Posts
Joined Feb 2009
Jan 26, 2023
spec2
Jan 26, 2023
1,085 Posts
Quote from abillmann :
Never realized SD cards were such a big deal that they warrant a front-facing slot. Huh.
Convenience yes. If you are loading photos/video the last thing you want is to have to go around to the back of the computer to install the card. But I think the SD slot is there because they could and it would look good on the spec sheet. No one is buying the Studio because it has an SD slot. Now if it has a CFX slot that would be hot.
2
Jan 26, 2023
92 Posts
Joined Nov 2017
Jan 26, 2023
karpo1
Jan 26, 2023
92 Posts
Quote from ptoro :
Not a good deal. This price is the same as the 32 GB Mac Mini M2 Pro, which has better or the same specs in almost every area as this Mac Studio.

As mentioned the M2 Pro CPUs are faster than the M1 Max's. But also the Wi-Fi is better (6e on the Mini vs. 6 on the Studio) and so is the the Bluetooth (5.3 on the Mini vs. 5.0 on the Studio).

The only reason to get this deal is if you don't care about CPU performance as much as you care about GPU. The Mac Studio M1 Max's GPU performance is better in benchmarks (likely due to the M1 Max's 12 GPU cores vs. the M2 Pro's 10). The only other differences between the two machines is the Studio has 2 additional USB-C ports and an SD card reader on the front.
Mac Mini M2 Pro 10core 32GB is same price as this Mac Studio. Mac Mini M2 10 core has 6 performance cores and 4 efficient, Studio has 8 performance cores with 2 efficient. Likely Studio has better CPU performance. Studio winning bother CPU and GPU front
2
Jan 26, 2023
2,410 Posts
Joined Jul 2006
Jan 26, 2023
abstraxion
Jan 26, 2023
2,410 Posts
Quote from munkle :
Not really, Microsoft and most Linux distros beat Apple easily on supporting older hardware. Apple is all over the board on how long they support their macs some get dropped quickly, some as soon as 3 years. The average appears to be around 8ish years before Apple won't update them anymore which isnt great compared to either windows or Linux. Microsoft actively updates all of my computers from 2013 and looking at their support docs they plan to do so until 2025, 4 years longer than Apple's average. Windows 8 just barely ended support 2 weeks ago, it came out in 2012. It's a guess when apple will drop support while Microsoft clearly defines how long it will support it's products.

On the phone side, apple is unparalleled, on the computer side they are not a leader at all. 8 years used to be a lot but computers and even phones now days last much longer than before. If you upgrade more often than 8 years you'll probably be fine but I have quite a few friends and family using computers over 8 years old.

You can look here and see the Mac os compatibility with older macs: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacOS

You'll notice macos 13 doesn't officially support anything older than 2017. Which isn't that old. It's also not the same year for every Mac either, some are supported longer than others.

Apple only recently started releasing security updates for older os versions and even with that they only go two years back and they don't support it the same as their current version. You can read more about that here: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2...-of-macos/ [arstechnica.com]

If you want a really detailed article on Mac os updates and how long you'll get them you can read one here: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2...a-problem/ [arstechnica.com]

Tldr: don't expect more than 8 years of updates and that isn't class leading at all.
TFW you find out how new of a computer you need for Windows 11
5
Jan 26, 2023
455 Posts
Joined Dec 2010
Jan 26, 2023
superluminal300
Jan 26, 2023
455 Posts
Heads up, there's no HDMI 2.1 on this so there is no option to output to a 4k TV at 120Hz.
1
Jan 26, 2023
307 Posts
Joined Jun 2004
Jan 26, 2023
CheaperMoFo
Jan 26, 2023
307 Posts
Quote from superluminal300 :
Heads up, there's no HDMI 2.1 on this so there is no option to output to a 4k TV at 120Hz.
Only if you want to use HDMI port to do that. A USB C port will do that fine.
4

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jan 26, 2023
207 Posts
Joined Nov 2013
Jan 26, 2023
EdwardK1919
Jan 26, 2023
207 Posts
At $699 I'm in for one even if it is obsolete!
3

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All