Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
forum thread Posted by LivelyApple7288 • Feb 25, 2025
forum thread Posted by LivelyApple7288 • Feb 25, 2025

1-Year The Wall Street Journal Digital Subscription 0.50c/week

$0.50

$40

98% off
Wall Street Journal
50 Comments 23,591 Views
Get Deal at Retailer
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
$50c/week $2 dollars a month

Unlimited access to WSJ.com and the WSJ app, including audio articles
Subscriber only audio and video content
Daily puzzles and crosswords
Exclusive offers from The Journal Collection
The 10-Point, a subscriber-exclusive daily newsletter

https://store.wsj.com/checkout/US...te-account
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
$50c/week $2 dollars a month

Unlimited access to WSJ.com and the WSJ app, including audio articles
Subscriber only audio and video content
Daily puzzles and crosswords
Exclusive offers from The Journal Collection
The 10-Point, a subscriber-exclusive daily newsletter

https://store.wsj.com/checkout/US...te-account

Community Voting

Deal Score
+20
Good Deal
Get Deal at Retailer
Leave a Comment
To participate in the comments, please log in.

50 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Mar 2, 2025
610 Posts
Joined Apr 2016
Mar 2, 2025
jhc651
Mar 2, 2025
610 Posts
Quote from slohasley :
I had no cancellation fee.
They meant that if you don't cancel ahead of time you will be billed the normal, full subscription price of $40/month, instead of the this alluring, shiny $2/month. Likely the whole reason these extremely low rates are offered is that they'll end up with x number of people who don't cancel and don't notice they're being billed 40 bucks a month.
Mar 2, 2025
972 Posts
Joined Nov 2014
Mar 2, 2025
trtem
Mar 2, 2025
972 Posts
Used a privacy.com credit card to sign up so it will be impossible for them to charge full price if I forget to cancel after a year. I was surprised when I briefly skimmed through it.
I thought this was a highly political publication but they have a lot of interesting, non political articles, which is what I will mostly be reading. Tired of all the sensationalized, partisan trash articles that both parties are putting out.
Mar 2, 2025
59 Posts
Joined Nov 2007
Mar 2, 2025
GoDucks71
Mar 2, 2025
59 Posts
Quote from danjayh :
FYI to anybody considering this, the WSJ is not the bastion of unbiased reporting it once was. The opinion side of the house is still pretty good, but the "news" side of the house has introduced a very noticeable leftward slant in the past few years. Depending on the topic they can still be fairly decent, but if it's something that the new "news" staff feels strongly about, they're just as bad as the rest of the media (which is why I keep putting news in quotes -- some articles have a good bit of left-leaning opinion subtly interspersed in them). My understanding is that they had significant staff turnover a few years back, leading to the degradation in quality. Part of the problem is that the news department follows the AP stylebook, which in recent years has itself become a way to propagate left-leaning dogma. Actually, come to think of it, the WSJ's opinion department just published a column about that issue: https://www.wsj.com/opinion/trump...s-78c25b2a
People thinking the Wall Street Journal is Left-leaning is more of an indication of just how far right those people are, rather than any indication of where the Wall Street Journal is politically.
Pro
Mar 3, 2025
710 Posts
Joined Oct 2009
Mar 3, 2025
danjayh
Pro
Mar 3, 2025
710 Posts
Quote from GoDucks71 :
People thinking the Wall Street Journal is Left-leaning is more of an indication of just how far right those people are, rather than any indication of where the Wall Street Journal is politically.
As a long-time WSJ subscriber, I will be the first to agree that even as recently as 4 years ago it was right-leaning, however, there has been significant turnover in the staff since then.

This was made abundantly clear in the run-up to the election, with the news department practically stumping for Biden -- downplaying the significance of inflation, fearmongering about white nationalists, fact-checking only one side of the presidential debates, ignoring Biden's cognitive decline, etc. It was a marked change from the WSJ of just a few years ago, which would have covered both sides fairly (the ideal), or maybe even given the right a bit of preferential treatment (not ideal, but at least different from most other mainstream papers). Now that the election is over they've cooled it off a bit, but you can definitely tell what side of the aisle the news staff are standing one.
Apr 26, 2025
1,604 Posts
Joined Aug 2009
Apr 26, 2025
Boglehead
Apr 26, 2025
1,604 Posts
Thanks! Still works.

Related Searches

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All