Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expired Posted by niki4h | Staff • Mar 24, 2025
expired Posted by niki4h | Staff • Mar 24, 2025

44.5" Acer Predator UWQHD (3440 x 1440) 800R Curved Widescreen OLED Gaming Monitor $718.37 + Free Shipping

$718

$1,600

55% off
Walmart
11 Comments 7,939 Views
Visit Walmart
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Walmart [walmart.com] has 44.5" Acer Predator UWQHD (3440 x 1440) 800R Curved Widescreen OLED Gaming Monitor for $806.34. Shipping is free. Now $718.37

Your feedback helps me find better deals! Please rate this deal or report if it's expired to save other members' time. Check out my other deals here. Thanks, niki4h
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Walmart [walmart.com] has 44.5" Acer Predator UWQHD (3440 x 1440) 800R Curved Widescreen OLED Gaming Monitor for $806.34. Shipping is free. Now $718.37

Your feedback helps me find better deals! Please rate this deal or report if it's expired to save other members' time. Check out my other deals here. Thanks, niki4h

Community Voting

Deal Score
+14
Good Deal
Visit Walmart

Price Intelligence

Model: Acer Predator 44.5" UWQHD (3440 x 1440) 800R Curved Widescreen OLED Gaming Monitor with AMD FreeSync Premium, Up to 240Hz, 0.01ms Pixel Response Time, 1000nits @ HDR 3%, DCI-P3 99%, X45 bmiiphuzx

Deal History 

Sort: Most Recent
Post Date Sold By Sale Price Activity
03/18/25Walmart$905
3
Leave a Comment
To participate in the comments, please log in.

11 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Mar 24, 2025
149 Posts
Joined Oct 2021
Mar 24, 2025
Eshelmen
Mar 24, 2025
149 Posts
44.5" at 3440p x 1440p seems a bit of a "stretch" ... Pun intended.

32:9 or 4K for a screen of that size would be ideal. But that's just me.

I'm curious how crisp this still is at that kind of lower resolution. Anyone use this?
Last edited by Eshelmen March 24, 2025 at 07:16 AM.
2
Mar 24, 2025
249 Posts
Joined Sep 2023
Mar 24, 2025
StrongCrowd1171
Mar 24, 2025
249 Posts
Quote from Eshelmen :
44.5" at 3440p x 1440p seems a bit of a "stretch" ... Pun intended.

32:9 or 4K for a screen of that size would be ideal. But that's just me.

I'm curious how crisp this still is at that kind of lower resolution. Anyone use this?
I have the IPS version of this and it works perfectly for what I need it for; FPS games at higher FPS. 4k is ideal for anything but competitive games, unless you have a 4090 or better, then go for it lol. 1440p is the sweet spot for people with low to upper mid video cards in competitive games.
1
Mar 24, 2025
149 Posts
Joined Oct 2021
Mar 24, 2025
Eshelmen
Mar 24, 2025
149 Posts
Quote from StrongCrowd1171 :
I have the IPS version of this and it works perfectly for what I need it for; FPS games at higher FPS. 4k is ideal for anything but competitive games, unless you have a 4090 or better, then go for it lol. 1440p is the sweet spot for people with low to upper mid video cards in competitive games.
I get that 1440p is a performance sweet spot, but my concern is more about PPI at this size. On a 34" ultrawide (3440x1440), the PPI is around 109, which keeps things sharp. But at 44.5", that drops to about 83, meaning pixels are much more spread out. That's a noticeable difference, especially for text and fine details in gaming.

Also, $800 is no small feat and feels a bit lopsided of a purchase if you're running a low-to-mid-range GPU. If 3440x1440 is where you want to be, there are far more budget friendly options that would give you the same resolution and high hz rate without the extra pixel stretch. At this size, something like 5120x1440 (32:9) would make a lot more sense in terms of clarity.
Last edited by Eshelmen March 24, 2025 at 01:19 PM.
2
Original Poster
Pro
Deal Hunter
Mar 24, 2025
7,749 Posts
Joined Nov 2012
Mar 24, 2025
niki4h
Mar 24, 2025
Original Poster
Pro
Deal Hunter
7,749 Posts
Price drop - thread updated
1
Mar 25, 2025
4,930 Posts
Joined Dec 2009
Mar 25, 2025
seanleeforever
Mar 25, 2025
4,930 Posts
Quote from Eshelmen :
44.5" at 3440p x 1440p seems a bit of a "stretch" ... Pun intended.

32:9 or 4K for a screen of that size would be ideal. But that's just me.

I'm curious how crisp this still is at that kind of lower resolution. Anyone use this?
i guess it would be more of a issue for mac users, but i personally think the density is pretty good at 83.3? which is just slightly lower than 2540*1440 32inch monitors (those are at 90 ppi). and those who uses 55 inch 4K TV are running at even lower PPI at 80
Mar 25, 2025
11 Posts
Joined Jun 2014
Mar 25, 2025
JiDs
Mar 25, 2025
11 Posts
Thanks! I ordered this. I've been eyeing the LG and corsair 45" oled 240hz monitors. I'm assuming this also has an LG display. Seems like a very good deal in comparison to msrp and similar monitor prices.

Have a very old samsung 34" cf791 that's starting to go. Play mostly space and racing Sims with some diablo and POE. This should be pretty immersion. I run a 4070 so I would like to stay away from 4k and 1440p runs well for me currently. I guess we will see if I like it. 😜
1
Mar 26, 2025
585 Posts
Joined Dec 2016
Mar 26, 2025
juanjohnson
Mar 26, 2025
585 Posts
Quote from StrongCrowd1171 :
I have the IPS version of this and it works perfectly for what I need it for; FPS games at higher FPS. 4k is ideal for anything but competitive games, unless you have a 4090 or better, then go for it lol. 1440p is the sweet spot for people with low to upper mid video cards in competitive games.

He's saying the size is too large for the resolution and I would have to agree. I have a 48" 4k oled Gaming monitor and it seems like it needs to be at 6k. Some things are just a little too fuzzy.
2

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Mar 26, 2025
2 Posts
Joined Jun 2014
Mar 26, 2025
Moorestuff14
Mar 26, 2025
2 Posts
I would warn anyone who is looking at purchasing this monitor, that it does not include an HMDI 2.1 port only 2.0 so it's not truly future-proof.
1
Mar 26, 2025
204 Posts
Joined Jul 2009
Mar 26, 2025
fstanek
Mar 26, 2025
204 Posts
Quote from Moorestuff14 :
I would warn anyone who is looking at purchasing this monitor, that it does not include an HMDI 2.1 port only 2.0 so it's not truly future-proof.
What do you mean by "future proof"? Its not like this monitor will gain more capabilities with new HDMI specs (or *any other monitor*)

If you want to take advantage of this monitor's 240Hz refresh rate at max resolution, you wouldn't be hooking it up using HDMI *today*, as HDMI 2.0 would only support 100Hz at that resolution. You would need to go w/ either USB-C or DisplayPort.

From the manual for this monitor, the max resolution is:

HDMI 2.0: 3440x1440@100Hz
DP 1.4/Type C: 3440X1440@240Hz
Mar 26, 2025
4,930 Posts
Joined Dec 2009
Mar 26, 2025
seanleeforever
Mar 26, 2025
4,930 Posts
Quote from fstanek :
What do you mean by "future proof"? Its not like this monitor will gain more capabilities with new HDMI specs (or *any other monitor*)

If you want to take advantage of this monitor's 240Hz refresh rate at max resolution, you wouldn't be hooking it up using HDMI *today*, as HDMI 2.0 would only support 100Hz at that resolution. You would need to go w/ either USB-C or DisplayPort.

From the manual for this monitor, the max resolution is:

HDMI 2.0: 3440x1440@100Hz
DP 1.4/Type C: 3440X1440@240Hz
he/she is talking about HDMI 2.1b (or whatever they change the name to be) that can use full spec of this monitor, for connections to things like game console, which is unlikely going to equip video out port using DP or USB C. but there are HDMI 2.1 to DP 1.4 adapters for about 20 dollars. so it is not like you don't have choice if you were forced to.

I tend not to think this is as big of a issue for PC users, but i know folks connect consoles to monitors. and sometimes adding adapters does introduce issues, so that's that.
Last edited by seanleeforever March 26, 2025 at 11:53 AM.
Mar 28, 2025
249 Posts
Joined Sep 2023
Mar 28, 2025
StrongCrowd1171
Mar 28, 2025
249 Posts
Quote from juanjohnson :
He's saying the size is too large for the resolution and I would have to agree. I have a 48" 4k oled Gaming monitor and it seems like it needs to be at 6k. Some things are just a little too fuzzy.
You missed his point entirely then. He's wanting an ultra wide or a larger screen with higher pixel density. I game on a 4k C4 48" and it's crystal clear for me lol. My secondary monitor is this one but the IPS version and there's no fuzz, distortion, ghosting, jitter, nothing. There's zero chance that this will look worse than mine being OLED. I was trying to alleviate his concerns. Yes, this will have lower PPI on paper like the newer 45" LG, but they have ways to mitigate and simulate the full experience via the hardware, software and firmware.

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All