Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
frontpage Posted by BeigeString3016 • 3d ago
frontpage Posted by BeigeString3016 • 3d ago

Anker 20,000 mAh 3-Port 87W Power Bank w/ Built-in USB-C Cable

+ Free Shipping

$45

$60

25% off
Newegg
31 Comments 9,734 Views
Get Deal at Newegg
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Anker Official Store via Newegg has Anker 20,000 mAh 3-Port 87W Power Bank w/ Built-in USB-C Cable (Black) on sale for $59.99 - $15 promo code EYGER2A26 applied in cart = $44.99. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Community Member BeigeString3016 for sharing this deal.

About this Item:
  • 1x Built-in USB-C Cable
  • 1x USB-C Port
  • 1x USB-A Port
  • 87W Total Output
  • 6.2" x 2.89" x 1.02"
  • 15.5oz

Editor's Notes

Written by SaltyOne | Staff
  • At the time of this posting, our research indicates that this is $7 lower than the next best comparable prices starting from $51.99.
  • Rated 4.6 out of 5 stars from Amazon customers.

Original Post

Written by BeigeString3016
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Anker Official Store via Newegg has Anker 20,000 mAh 3-Port 87W Power Bank w/ Built-in USB-C Cable (Black) on sale for $59.99 - $15 promo code EYGER2A26 applied in cart = $44.99. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Community Member BeigeString3016 for sharing this deal.

About this Item:
  • 1x Built-in USB-C Cable
  • 1x USB-C Port
  • 1x USB-A Port
  • 87W Total Output
  • 6.2" x 2.89" x 1.02"
  • 15.5oz

Editor's Notes

Written by SaltyOne | Staff
  • At the time of this posting, our research indicates that this is $7 lower than the next best comparable prices starting from $51.99.
  • Rated 4.6 out of 5 stars from Amazon customers.

Original Post

Written by BeigeString3016

Community Voting

Deal Score
+11
Good Deal
Get Deal at Newegg
Leave a Comment
To participate in the comments, please log in.

Top Comments

Odds are the battery will wear out before the cable does. Even if it doesn't, they have additional ports. These are reinforced cables, and I view them as a net positive.
I have a couple of much cheaper no-name 20Ah battery banks (which do not do 87W, or anywhere close to it — only about 28W, but that's another story) and the cables are very useful, the problem with the cheap ones I have is the cables are super short which makes it awkward sometimes to position the power bank when connected to a phone. The cable on this looks to be substantially longer, which is a big deal if you ever dealt with (very) the short ones.

While I like Anker products, I believe the price is quite high for the capacity of the battery. However, if you need something like this, this should be a better product than some of the other products posted here which start with B — this is more likely to be close to advertised capacity (the other will be off by a good 20%), and keeps discharge to a relatively safe, and healthy for the battery ~1C max (<=1.2C if capacity is indeed 20Ah as advertised), whereas the other product will do over 2C, even 2.5C. This is a premium price for a solid product, I wish it was 25Ah (or even the FAA carryon limit of 27Ah = 100Wh @ 3.7V), but if you need one to charge laptops and will use it a lot, I'd pay the premium for a more solid product like this.

31 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

2d ago
1,534 Posts
Joined Jul 2019
2d ago
BlueVoyager308
2d ago
1,534 Posts
Quote from kherbinoskie :
Advertised as 20,000mah but only with usable stored energy of 14,000mah. That's a crazy low 65% efficiency. In comparison, power stations acceptable efficiency is 85% and up and which a lot of them these days can do 90% and up..

But at least Anker are honest about the mediocre 65% efficiency but this performance is junk. It means that you are carrying more weight and volume but you'll never ever be able to use it.
65% is the norm for this type. I don't know anyone has a 85%. If they do, it will cost you an arm or leg, and it is rated using 5 V.
2d ago
1,315 Posts
Joined Oct 2008
2d ago
asuka
2d ago
1,315 Posts
Quote from kherbinoskie :
Nah. You are just an Anker fanboy.

Veektomx is 88% $23
Ugreen 100w is 82% $55
These to name a few and there are many out there that are far better than 65%. Maybe do a bit of research. 65% is far unacceptable unless it's wireless charging.
Agree that 35% loss is high, but with right voltage and thickness (less thermal) it can be 20-30%.

Anker professional products tout an up to 18% loss.

I think UGreen and Veek are using laptop cooling pads when quoting those numbers. If you use Ankers in similar conditions, I suspect it'll be closer.

Anker probably has high number of returns and is safeguarding with the 65% number. Likely assuming worst operating conditions.
Last edited by asuka April 24, 2025 at 02:30 PM.
1
2d ago
566 Posts
Joined May 2017
2d ago
BillytheGOAT
2d ago
566 Posts
Quote from asuka :
Odds are the battery will wear out before the cable does. Even if it doesn't, they have additional ports. These are reinforced cables, and I view them as a net positive.
I think it's a net neutral because the whole thing could be smaller without the extra cable by a decent bit. Like I have the 10k Ankeer version and it can barely fit in my pockets with a phone in it. My old one was perfectly fine with that.
2d ago
1,315 Posts
Joined Oct 2008
2d ago
asuka
2d ago
1,315 Posts
Quote from BillytheGOAT :
I think it's a net neutral because the whole thing could be smaller without the extra cable by a decent bit. Like I have the 10k Ankeer version and it can barely fit in my pockets with a phone in it. My old one was perfectly fine with that.

It's not that much, you can pop it open to see why. The two smallest are the Baseus Picogo and INIU units. It isn't much because all they do is solder the cable and then secure it with gobs of glue.

(And before anyone says there is an INIU unit that is way smaller, the keychain one that truly is, uses a pouch cell - not the 18650's these use).

Anker Zolo is larger because Anker is really cautious about fire hazard. Not the cable itself.
2d ago
566 Posts
Joined May 2017
2d ago
BillytheGOAT
2d ago
566 Posts
Quote from asuka :
It's not that much, you can pop it open to see why. The two smallest are the Baseus Picogo and INIU units. It isn't much because all they do is solder the cable and then secure it with gobs of glue.

(And before anyone says there is an INIU unit that is way smaller, the keychain one that truly is, uses a pouch cell - not the 18650's these use).

Anker Zolo is larger because Anker is really cautious about fire hazard. Not the cable itself.
Yeah, I trust the anker on average way higher because of QC, I was just mentioning that it's huge.
2d ago
32 Posts
Joined Mar 2006
2d ago
dmkyung
2d ago
32 Posts
I have bought one last Apr. I don't know about all the technical spec. But I can use it to do almost 3 full charge on my Pixel8. With It can also power my CPAP machine with a 20V 3.25A 60+W input adapter for 15H, almost 2 night. Love it.
2d ago
10 Posts
Joined Jan 2019
2d ago
Hendricks27
2d ago
10 Posts
Quote from kherbinoskie :
Nah. You are just an Anker fanboy.Veektomx is 88% $23 Ugreen 100w is 82% $55These to name a few and there are many out there that are far better than 65%. Maybe do a bit of research. 65% is far unacceptable unless it's wireless charging.
Where did you get the 65% from? I actually had tried once last year, and it can charge my legion go 1.2 times. The legion go has 50.2wh battery and 20000mah is roughly 74 wh, which gives 81.4% efficiency.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

2d ago
1,535 Posts
Joined Jul 2019
2d ago
BlueVoyager308
2d ago
1,535 Posts
A typical 10,000 mAh power bank has 65% of the claimed capacity when using 5V charging. The 9V and 12V charging will see 50% less of the 5V, and 1/3, respectively. This is called "Nameplate Capacity".

Some manufacturers will list the effective capacity (nameplate capacity) of the power bank, when and where is required by law. Many won't tell you about it, if no law is required (like in the U.S. market).
Last edited by BlueVoyager308 April 24, 2025 at 11:43 AM.
2d ago
1,606 Posts
Joined Feb 2015
2d ago
kherbinoskie
2d ago
1,606 Posts
Quote from Hendricks27 :
Where did you get the 65% from? I actually had tried once last year, and it can charge my legion go 1.2 times. The legion go has 50.2wh battery and 20000mah is roughly 74 wh, which gives 81.4% efficiency.
Read their own product description. They said it themselves not me. They tested it in a more scientific way than using your Legion.
Yesterday
10 Posts
Joined Jan 2019
Yesterday
Hendricks27
Yesterday
10 Posts
Quote from BlueVoyager308 :
A typical 10,000 mAh power bank has 65% of the claimed capacity when using 5V charging. The 9V and 12V charging will see 50% less of the 5V, and 1/3, respectively. This is called "Nameplate Capacity".Some manufacturers will list the effective capacity (nameplate capacity) of the power bank, when and where is required by law. Many won't tell you about it, if no law is required (like in the U.S. market).
This is high school level physics. A typical 10000mah powerbank has 3.7v * 10000 mah = 37000 mWh = 37Wh, and it is the cell capacity in your picture. Same calculcation, if power bank output at 5v, 9v and 12v respectively, the total capacity it can output is 32.5wh, 28.8wh and 26.4wh. Any of which is higher than what you said "65% capacity". watt hour is unit of energy, mah is not.
Yesterday
10 Posts
Joined Jan 2019
Yesterday
Hendricks27
Yesterday
10 Posts
Quote from kherbinoskie :
Read their own product description. They said it themselves not me. They tested it in a more scientific way than using your Legion.
Read my renewest post to Bluevoyager308. You misunderstood what 65% mean.
Yesterday
1,535 Posts
Joined Jul 2019
Yesterday
BlueVoyager308
Yesterday
1,535 Posts
Quote from Hendricks27 :
This is high school level physics. A typical 10000mah powerbank has 3.7v * 10000 mah = 37000 mWh = 37Wh, and it is the cell capacity in your picture. Same calculcation, if power bank output at 5v, 9v and 12v respectively, the total capacity it can output is 32.5wh, 28.8wh and 26.4wh. Any of which is higher than what you said "65% capacity". watt hour is unit of energy, mah is not.
What is 5V : 6500 mAh in the picture?

6,500mAh = 65% of 10,000mAh claimed capacity.
Yesterday
10 Posts
Joined Jan 2019
Yesterday
Hendricks27
Yesterday
10 Posts
Quote from BlueVoyager308 :
What is 5V : 6500 mAh in the picture?6,500mAh = 65% of 10,000mAh claimed capacity.
5v at 6500mah means 32.5 wh, divided by 37wh which yield 88% efficiency. Come on, this is exactly why you need to go to school and learn physics 101. Or you can google what is unit of energy and what mah means.
Yesterday
1,535 Posts
Joined Jul 2019
Yesterday
BlueVoyager308
Yesterday
1,535 Posts
Quote from Hendricks27 :
5v at 6500mah means 32.5 wh, divided by 37wh which yield 88% efficiency. Come on, this is exactly why you need to go to school and learn physics 101. Or you can google what is unit of energy and what mah means.
It doesn't change the fact that the usable capacity is 6500mAh, if you still use 5V charging. And I only use 9V changing which give me even less of the 10,000mAh, but that's for another day.

6500mAh is 65% of 10,000mAh. In real world you get even less than 65%. I think you know already.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Yesterday
10 Posts
Joined Jan 2019
Yesterday
Hendricks27
Yesterday
10 Posts
Quote from BlueVoyager308 :
It doesn't change the fact that the usable capacity is 6500mAh, if you still use 5V charging. And I only use 9V changing which give me even less of the 10,000mAh, but that's for another day.6500mAh is 65% of 10,000mAh. In real world you get even less than 65%. I think you know already.
This will be my final response.
First, your calculation of 65% efficiency is incorrect.
Second, as you mentioned, charging at 5V yields a "capacity" of 6500mAh; however, 5V is higher than the typical receiver device battery voltage (usually around 3.7V). Therefore, the actual energy transferred to the receiver battery corresponds to a higher mAh value than 6500mAh.
Third, in your earlier comment, you cited other manufacturers like UGREEN achieving 88% efficiency. I suggest you revisit their specifications and carefully read what they state about their 5V capacity.
Finally, while I understand that not everyone has the benefit of completing a basic education, ignorance is not an excuse for confidently spreading misinformation.
Just Now
1,535 Posts
Joined Jul 2019
Just Now
BlueVoyager308
Just Now
1,535 Posts
Quote from Hendricks27 :
This will be my final response.
First, your calculation of 65% efficiency is incorrect.
Second, as you mentioned, charging at 5V yields a "capacity" of 6500mAh; however, 5V is higher than the typical receiver device battery voltage (usually around 3.7V). Therefore, the actual energy transferred to the receiver battery corresponds to a higher mAh value than 6500mAh.
Third, in your earlier comment, you cited other manufacturers like UGREEN achieving 88% efficiency. I suggest you revisit their specifications and carefully read what they state about their 5V capacity.
Finally, while I understand that not everyone has the benefit of completing a basic education, ignorance is not an excuse for confidently spreading misinformation.
It was someone else said 88% or whatever. Not myself.

6,500mAh is 65% of 10,000mAh no matter how you look at it. I go with this number. It is listed there for a reason, and is required by laws of some countries.

Related Searches

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All