Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
frontpage Posted by f12_26 | Staff • 6d ago
frontpage Posted by f12_26 | Staff • 6d ago

4-Bay Orico RAID Hard Drive Enclosure for 3.5" SATA HDDs (Up to 88TB storage)

+ Free Shipping

$114

$190

40% off
Amazon
34 Comments 25,059 Views
Get Deal at Amazon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
ORICO Direct US Store via Amazon has 4-Bay Orico RAID Hard Drive Enclosure for 3.5" SATA HDDs (Up to 88TB storage) on sale for $189.99 - 40% Redeem on the page or with promo code ORICO9848RU3 at checkout = $113.99. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Staff Member f12_26 for sharing this deal.

About this Item:
  • 4-bay enclosure supports 3.5" SATA disks w/ trayless design and safety locking
  • Maximum storage capacity can reach up to 88TB (4x 22TB)
  • 8 modes of configuration including RAID 0, 1, 3, 5, 10, JBOD, CLONE, and CLEAR, to achieve dual data backup, enhance data security
  • USB 3.0 interface with 5Gbps supports transmission rate up to 235 MB/s
  • Built-in 150W power supply
  • Aluminum-alloy case equipped with 80mm silent cooling fan and front and rear vents for heat dissipation
  • Compatible with Windows, Mac OS, Linux systems

Editor's Notes

Written by johnny_miller | Staff

Original Post

Written by f12_26 | Staff
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
ORICO Direct US Store via Amazon has 4-Bay Orico RAID Hard Drive Enclosure for 3.5" SATA HDDs (Up to 88TB storage) on sale for $189.99 - 40% Redeem on the page or with promo code ORICO9848RU3 at checkout = $113.99. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Staff Member f12_26 for sharing this deal.

About this Item:
  • 4-bay enclosure supports 3.5" SATA disks w/ trayless design and safety locking
  • Maximum storage capacity can reach up to 88TB (4x 22TB)
  • 8 modes of configuration including RAID 0, 1, 3, 5, 10, JBOD, CLONE, and CLEAR, to achieve dual data backup, enhance data security
  • USB 3.0 interface with 5Gbps supports transmission rate up to 235 MB/s
  • Built-in 150W power supply
  • Aluminum-alloy case equipped with 80mm silent cooling fan and front and rear vents for heat dissipation
  • Compatible with Windows, Mac OS, Linux systems

Editor's Notes

Written by johnny_miller | Staff

Original Post

Written by f12_26 | Staff

Community Voting

Deal Score
+29
Good Deal
Get Deal at Amazon

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Top Comments

FrugalBrutal
2607 Posts
692 Reputation
I bought two different Orico ensures and returned both. Performance was not good. Slow transfer speeds. Hard Drives wouldn't be recognized. No bueno.
Oil_Burner
1006 Posts
66 Reputation
This thing failed on me with ZFS, then failed again. Might be good for other filesystems, but unreliable for ZFS. Could be the USB 3.0 interface.

33 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

6d ago
8 Posts
Joined May 2020
6d ago
HappyTree742
6d ago
8 Posts
Usb 3?
2
6d ago
3 Posts
Joined Apr 2025
6d ago
SensibleWing4509
6d ago
3 Posts
For those like me who want JBOD and would happily buy without RAID: The one with RAID shows $121 (after tax) at checkout. The one without says $135 despite starting at a far lower cost.

Quick Edit: I'll probably still be skipping due to being USB 3.0 and all of my most recent machines having 3.2 (3.1 Gen 2). Unless someone more knowledgeable (at least than me at 2am) knows this doesn't matter with SATA 3?
6d ago
2,607 Posts
Joined Sep 2007
6d ago
FrugalBrutal
6d ago
2,607 Posts

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank FrugalBrutal

I bought two different Orico ensures and returned both. Performance was not good. Slow transfer speeds. Hard Drives wouldn't be recognized. No bueno.
12
6d ago
268 Posts
Joined Dec 2010
6d ago
cutwheel
6d ago
268 Posts
190x.6-40=74 =/= 114?
1
2
6d ago
8,950 Posts
Joined Nov 2008
6d ago
Lanmanna
6d ago
8,950 Posts
Is this considered a NAS?
6d ago
2 Posts
Joined May 2014
6d ago
andrewa7113
6d ago
2 Posts

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank andrewa7113

Quote from Lanmanna :
Is this considered a NAS?
Not a NAS, just external storage
1
6d ago
1,006 Posts
Joined May 2018
6d ago
Oil_Burner
6d ago
1,006 Posts

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank Oil_Burner

This thing failed on me with ZFS, then failed again. Might be good for other filesystems, but unreliable for ZFS. Could be the USB 3.0 interface.
2

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

6d ago
337 Posts
Joined Apr 2008
6d ago
sr27
6d ago
337 Posts
Quote from SensibleWing4509 :
For those like me who want JBOD and would happily buy without RAID: The one with RAID shows $121 (after tax) at checkout. The one without says $135 despite starting at a far lower cost.Quick Edit: I'll probably still be skipping due to being USB 3.0 and all of my most recent machines having 3.2 (3.1 Gen 2). Unless someone more knowledgeable (at least than me at 2am) knows this doesn't matter with SATA 3?
5gbps is equivalent to the speed of data transfer from one Sata drive. So it's effectively like accessing one drive at a time
2
2
6d ago
515 Posts
Joined Jul 2022
6d ago
techie_review101
6d ago
515 Posts
Quote from FrugalBrutal :
I bought two different Orico ensures and returned both. Performance was not good. Slow transfer speeds. Hard Drives wouldn't be recognized. No bueno.
Same experience ended up with ugreen and happy with it so far
1
6d ago
1,513 Posts
Joined Dec 2005
6d ago
Gettingnowhere
6d ago
1,513 Posts
Quote from techie_review101 :
Same experience ended up with ugreen and happy with it so far
Can you recommend anyone for UGREEN one that is also just an external storage with RAID? Or whatever you are using? Thanks.
6d ago
5,971 Posts
Joined Dec 2007
6d ago
famewolf
6d ago
5,971 Posts
I would both buy a different vendor and get the non raid edition. I have a 10 bay "truenas" server and zfs/btrfs which both have snapshot/built in file compression are much safer (if the system dies I can load those drives on any other machine that supports those filesystems...much more problematic with raid hardware when it fails), this vendor has high issue reports. Yes raid is "faster" but when using usb even for gen 3.2 the bottleneck is still going to be usb and not the filesystem. if available (and I don't know that they are) I'd go with usb-c which can go to at least 20gbps. Regular usb gen 3.2 max's out at 10gbps. Accessing multiple drives can easily push up to that 20gbps max if reading is done correctly (ie across multiple drives at same time since the same data is stored in multiple places)
6d ago
13,721 Posts
Joined Aug 2004
6d ago
avalon
6d ago
13,721 Posts
there you go, then you can use seagate drives in raid5 and when they fail every year you just pop the bad one out and let it rebuild

just don't get all four drives from the same batch

ah I see ugreen is recommended instead
6d ago
101 Posts
Joined Nov 2012
6d ago
huhster
6d ago
101 Posts
Quote from SensibleWing4509 :
For those like me who want JBOD and would happily buy without RAID: The one with RAID shows $121 (after tax) at checkout. The one without says $135 despite starting at a far lower cost.

Quick Edit: I'll probably still be skipping due to being USB 3.0 and all of my most recent machines having 3.2 (3.1 Gen 2). Unless someone more knowledgeable (at least than me at 2am) knows this doesn't matter with SATA 3?
The RAID version can still be setup as a JBOD. If anyone is on the fence, get the RAID version as it is less expensive.
6d ago
8 Posts
Joined Dec 2012
6d ago
AkuKnives
6d ago
8 Posts
Quote from SensibleWing4509 :
For those like me who want JBOD and would happily buy without RAID: The one with RAID shows $121 (after tax) at checkout. The one without says $135 despite starting at a far lower cost.Quick Edit: I'll probably still be skipping due to being USB 3.0 and all of my most recent machines having 3.2 (3.1 Gen 2). Unless someone more knowledgeable (at least than me at 2am) knows this doesn't matter with SATA 3?
This won't matter, as even with RAID 0 using the fastest SATA drives available (SATA SSD's) you're still not going to saturate the 5Gbps bandwidth.
In short, no need to go higher than 5Gbps for enclosures that don't use NVMe, even if you use RAID 0 on 4 drives.
3

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

6d ago
191 Posts
Joined Jan 2008
6d ago
Thoang77
6d ago
191 Posts
Quote from AkuKnives :
This won't matter, as even with RAID 0 using the fastest SATA drives available (SATA SSD's) you're still not going to saturate the 5Gbps bandwidth. In short, no need to go higher than 5Gbps for enclosures that don't use NVMe, even if you use RAID 0 on 4 drives.
A single SATA SSD is capable of saturating 5gbps USB3. Overhead and other factors will limit it from actually hitting 625MB/s but directly connected via SATA they can do 550MB/s. You could push the limits of usb 3.1 gen 2 with a 2x SATA SSD in RAID0.
2

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All