Samsung 65" Q900 QLED 8K 7680x4320 HDR 120Hz-Native Smart TV FS $2297.99
Thread created 05-12-2021 by MyTimothyKelley
+5 Score
26 Replies
13,531 Views
It's not an opinion, it's science. You can't see the difference.
Samsung 65" Q900 QLED 8K 7680x4320 HDR 120Hz-Native Smart TV FS $2297.99
Thread created 05-12-2021 by MyTimothyKelley
+5 Score
26 Replies
13,531 Views
come back here in 5 years and reaffirm your opinion
Samsung 65" Q900 QLED 8K 7680x4320 HDR 120Hz-Native Smart TV FS $2297.99
Thread created 05-12-2021 by MyTimothyKelley
+5 Score
26 Replies
13,531 Views
Might want to try to do some research before posting foolish responses. Hint: Resolution that films are mastered in? Bandwidth requirements for 8K streaming? Commercial factors driving 8K...
Samsung 65" Q900 QLED 8K 7680x4320 HDR 120Hz-Native Smart TV FS $2297.99
Thread created 05-12-2021 by MyTimothyKelley
+5 Score
26 Replies
13,531 Views
I bought just one 65" for my RTX 3090 and experience side to side whiplash with the screen just 4 feet away from me. Playing Assassin's Creed Origins and Valhalla. Looks absolutely amazing though!
Samsung 65" Q900 QLED 8K 7680x4320 HDR 120Hz-Native Smart TV FS $2297.99
Thread created 05-12-2021 by MyTimothyKelley
+5 Score
26 Replies
13,531 Views
can you tell me tomorrow's lottery numbers too?
Samsung 65" Q900 QLED 8K 7680x4320 HDR 120Hz-Native Smart TV FS $2297.99
Thread created 05-12-2021 by MyTimothyKelley
+5 Score
26 Replies
13,531 Views
Amazon and Costco has them for $1849. Maybe its time for me to pull the trigger
Samsung 65" Q900 QLED 8K 7680x4320 HDR 120Hz-Native Smart TV FS $2297.99
Thread created 05-12-2021 by MyTimothyKelley
+5 Score
26 Replies
13,531 Views
The only true 4k content out there is by 4k uhd blurays. 4k digital is lossy and compressed and while pixel placement may be 4k, you have to give up detail and quality that you don't from even a...
Samsung 65" Q900 QLED 8K 7680x4320 HDR 120Hz-Native Smart TV FS $2297.99
Thread created 05-12-2021 by MyTimothyKelley
+5 Score
26 Replies
13,531 Views
Yep, still mostly true today. 4K provides a marginal benefit at viewing distances that most people find comfortable, so 8K is nothing but TV makers playing to up to the FOMO. An 8K TV will be...
Samsung 65" Q900 QLED 8K 7680x4320 HDR 120Hz-Native Smart TV FS $2297.99
Thread created 05-12-2021 by MyTimothyKelley
+5 Score
26 Replies
13,531 Views
This t.v. will be obsolete by the time 8k content is regularly available. There'll be upgraded versions of HDR, upgraded Atmos, upgraded everything.
Hell, we've barely got enough 4k content, at...
Samsung 65" Q900 QLED 8K 7680x4320 HDR 120Hz-Native Smart TV FS $2297.99
Thread created 05-12-2021 by MyTimothyKelley
+5 Score
26 Replies
13,531 Views
10 years ago... "4k on a 65 inch is dumb you cant tell a difference"
Samsung 65" Q900 QLED 8K 7680x4320 HDR 120Hz-Native Smart TV FS $2297.99
Thread created 05-12-2021 by MyTimothyKelley
+5 Score
26 Replies
13,531 Views
Not even remotely accurate. I remember when people were saying this about watching movies (shot on 35MM) at 720p. There is a huge difference in the details when they have not been compressed to...
Samsung 65" Q900 QLED 8K 7680x4320 HDR 120Hz-Native Smart TV FS $2297.99
Thread created 05-12-2021 by MyTimothyKelley
+5 Score
26 Replies
13,531 Views
4K is enough
Samsung 65" Q900 QLED 8K 7680x4320 HDR 120Hz-Native Smart TV FS $2297.99
Thread created 05-12-2021 by MyTimothyKelley
+5 Score
26 Replies
13,531 Views
I have 3x 43-inch 4k Samsungs in portrait orientation on my desk. I sit about 30 inches from the center screens. If I used this one 65-inch 8k monitor, it would be like having 4 of my current 4k...
Samsung 65" Q900 QLED 8K 7680x4320 HDR 120Hz-Native Smart TV FS $2297.99
Thread created 05-12-2021 by MyTimothyKelley
+5 Score
26 Replies
13,531 Views
I'm trying to future proof though, so looking at 32K @ 960Hz. I heard Samsung just came out with one. Is $129,990.00 too much to spend on a 55" TV?
Samsung 65" Q900 QLED 8K 7680x4320 HDR 120Hz-Native Smart TV FS $2297.99
Thread created 05-12-2021 by MyTimothyKelley
+5 Score
26 Replies
13,531 Views
He's trolling, just report and ignore
Samsung 65" Q900 QLED 8K 7680x4320 HDR 120Hz-Native Smart TV FS $2297.99
Thread created 05-12-2021 by MyTimothyKelley
+5 Score
26 Replies
13,531 Views
8k makes more sense when you start blowing up the screen to 120" or more. Projectors will benefit with 8k when that becomes a standard in the market in the next 5+ years.
Samsung 65" Q900 QLED 8K 7680x4320 HDR 120Hz-Native Smart TV FS $2297.99
Thread created 05-12-2021 by MyTimothyKelley
+5 Score
26 Replies
13,531 Views
You're right.. Same thing, I am also referring the scientific findings only.
Yes, people can say that there is some smoothness, some clarity and all, but it's not a huge difference, beside that like...
Samsung 65" Q900 QLED 8K 7680x4320 HDR 120Hz-Native Smart TV FS $2297.99
Thread created 05-12-2021 by MyTimothyKelley
+5 Score
26 Replies
13,531 Views
I finally saw someone use the "human eye can't see 120 FPS" comment in the wild!
This has been mostly debunked and is something that will still require much further research in the future. But,...
Samsung 65" Q900 QLED 8K 7680x4320 HDR 120Hz-Native Smart TV FS $2297.99
Thread created 05-12-2021 by MyTimothyKelley
+5 Score
26 Replies
13,531 Views
1440p native would be nice, I would consider it.
Samsung 65" Q900 QLED 8K 7680x4320 HDR 120Hz-Native Smart TV FS $2297.99
Thread created 05-12-2021 by MyTimothyKelley
+5 Score
26 Replies
13,531 Views
8K, 10K, 12K are all dumb and mostly fake.
A human eye can't perceive that much resolution or tell the difference between them, so anything more than 3-4K resolution is just symbolic.
Also, human...
Page 1 of
2
1
2