WiFi HD Outdoor Camera with Motion Activated Bright White Light, Two Way Audio, 85FT Night Vision (2-pack)
LNWiHD-2PK
This is a Dahua OEM camera ( you can find it also listed under the brand of IMOU if you're looking online for press releases on it )
List: Reg.$489.99 ( yes, Lorex has some insane list prices for their cameras.. hint never pay their list price )
Subtotal $289.99
Discounts -$87.00 (
code FRIENDS for 30% off - remember to hit apply, CYBER25 for 25% - looks like code
CYBER25 now takes 30% off )
Shipping Fees $0.00
Order Total $202.99 ( $101.50 each )
1 pack / single camera: $132.99 ( LNWiHD )
4 pack: $342.99 ( LNWiHD-4PK ) - $85.75 each
6 pack: $482.99 ( LNWiHD-6PK ) - $80.50 each
LNWiHD-2PK
SPECIFICATIONS
WiFi CAMERA
Indoor / outdoor monitoring camera
1080P RESOLUTION
High definition 1080p HD resolution
85FT NIGHT VISION ( normally optimistic number from the vendor )
Maximum night vision range
135°FIELD OF VIEW
Ideal for monitoring wide, open areas
16GB MICRO SD
Maximum capacity 1 × 128GB SD card
Weatherproof IP65 rated3 and cold climate capability (-4°F / -20°C)
https://www.lorextechnology.com/h...LNWiHD-1-p
https://www.lorextechnology.com/h...HD-2PK-1-p
https://www.lorextechnology.com/h...HD-4PK-1-p
https://www.lorextechnology.com/h...HD-6PK-1-p
13 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Similar style to those in the Lorex "4K" kits now at Costco, however this is the WiFi version at 1080P res.
Here's a rather funny IMOU commercial: ( hint DO NOT trust the commercial, really security cameras are not that awesome that some guy will take of this mask and wimper - a dog and shotgun helps more for that )
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlT8DVL
ipcamtalk discussion of this model:
https://ipcamtalk.com/threads/2mp...era.34110/
Note there are so far no members who have this, and thus none who have reviewed it.
update:
LNWiHD
Heat Rating: 122°F | 50°C
Cold Rating: -4°F | -20°C
Water Rating: IP65
Mat - their WiFi cameras are rated to -4°F, will they actually stop working around that temp?
Mat - their WiFi cameras are rated to -4°F, will they actually stop working around that temp?
Good question - probably not right way, and maybe in real cases it would need to be colder.
These are wired to power cameras, so yes - you should be able to find something which works - as it appears the connection is a standard USB variation.
I expect it to be able to connect to an NVR / VMS / Blue Iris - should have a standard rtsp stream - check the specs. ( I have not yet looked too close, so do double check )
Costco carries the 6x IP POE "4K" camera + NVR version of this in store.
Online they use to have the larger camera kit.
Lorex also lists the IP POE "4K" version - discount should also work for the IP POE camera. The kits have not been listed for sale at Lorex so far.
You've asked.. Costco has delivered!
https://slickdeals.net/forums/showpost.php?p=
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
You've asked.. Costco has delivered!
https://slickdeals.net/forums/showpost.php?p=
I'm just trying to add a few indoor cameras around the house as well as one or two outside.
$180 list for the new model ... nicer looking camera, good to see Ring step up their game.
"Ideal for homes without a PoE router, the PoE Adapter provides power over ethernet for your Stick Up Cam Wired." - states Ring on their POE Adapter page: https://shop.ring.com/products/po...0149563481
What the heck is a POE router!?!?! I don't think I have ever seen one. ( ahhh.. Ubiquiti Networks makes some of those - but often their POE is passive on many products so not a good fit for what I need, would have been better imho if they said POE switch - a more common product )
N123, perhaps with your experience you can help out with a few questions ( I've looked but not much luck yet on answers )
1) Has Ring fixed the issue regarding lacking embedded time stamps on this new model?
2) Is Ring still a closed system? i.e. no local recording capability? i.e. no rtsp feed?
3) Are these new models POE capable models able to do continuous recording? If so, what is the bandwidth requirements?
4) If these are dependent on the cloud service being available and up, what happens when during an ISP / cloud outage?
My Notes:
$180 list for the new model ... nicer looking camera, good to see Ring step up their game.
"Ideal for homes without a PoE router, the PoE Adapter provides power over ethernet for your Stick Up Cam Wired." - states Ring on their POE Adapter page: https://shop.ring.com/products/po...0149563481 [ring.com]
What the heck is a POE router!?!?! I don't think I have ever seen one. ( ahhh.. Ubiquiti Networks makes some of those - but often their POE is passive on many products so not a good fit for what I need, would have been better imho if they said POE switch - a more common product )
N123, perhaps with your experience you can help out with a few questions ( I've looked but not much luck yet on answers )
1) Has Ring fixed the issue regarding lacking embedded time stamps on this new model?
2) Is Ring still a closed system? i.e. no local recording capability? i.e. no rtsp feed?
3) Are these new models POE capable models able to do continuous recording? If so, what is the bandwidth requirements?
4) If these are dependent on the cloud service being available and up, what happens when during an ISP / cloud outage?
My Notes:
$180 list for the new model ... nicer looking camera, good to see Ring step up their game.
"Ideal for homes without a PoE router, the PoE Adapter provides power over ethernet for your Stick Up Cam Wired." - states Ring on their POE Adapter page: https://shop.ring.com/products/po...0149563481 [ring.com]
What the heck is a POE router!?!?! I don't think I have ever seen one. ( ahhh.. Ubiquiti Networks makes some of those - but often their POE is passive on many products so not a good fit for what I need, would have been better imho if they said POE switch - a more common product )
N123, perhaps with your experience you can help out with a few questions ( I've looked but not much luck yet on answers )
1) Has Ring fixed the issue regarding lacking embedded time stamps on this new model?
2) Is Ring still a closed system? i.e. no local recording capability? i.e. no rtsp feed?
3) Are these new models POE capable models able to do continuous recording? If so, what is the bandwidth requirements?
4) If these are dependent on the cloud service being available and up, what happens when during an ISP / cloud outage?
My Notes:
I will do my best to answer your questions:
• you do not need a POE router nor do you need to pay to use ring's designated POE adapter— you can use any POE switch: I am using the cheap TPlink POE switch (https://www.amazon.com/TP-Link-TL...tplink+poe) and it works just fine. Minimal power consumption compared to a PC/NVR/DVR and its fanless so there is no noise.
• The very wide FOV is awesome with the Ring cameras— I have switched from a five camera Lorex system to only needing three of the Ring cameras although YMMV depending on where your cameras are placed/your particular situation. The quality of the image is as good as any of the other IP cameras I have used in the past.
• The main advantage of this system is **proactive** notification of a trespasser/criminal with Ring's proprietary software/customizable motion to text zones/etc. versus most CCTV systems which do nothing proactive to prevent crime and only provide you with footage after the fact. Rings new software features allowing multicam view on your phone but also allow much more easy review of the footage with a scrolling timeline and selectable dates: again much better than what Lorex offered on my system
in regard to your particular questions:
• I do not believe that ring actually embeds timestamps in the footage itself but this info is easily viewable from the app
• as far as I know, it is still a closed system with no capability for local recording.
• Currently the cameras only record when motion is detected but there is word that ring will soon be offering 24 hour high/continuous recording to compete with Nest.
• I believe that if your Internet goes out the cameras no longer work-- however, since the cameras are POE and not Wi-Fi, the signal never drops. My ethernet connection to the Internet almost never fails—the main issue for most people is unreliable Wi-Fi.
I highly recommend these: so much better than what I was getting with Lorex… Hope this is helpful.
I will do my best to answer your questions:
• you do not need a POE router nor do you need to pay to use ring's designated POE adapter— you can use any POE switch: I am using the cheap TPlink POE switch (https://www.amazon.com/TP-Link-TL...tplink+poe) and it works just fine. Minimal power consumption compared to a PC/NVR/DVR and its fanless so there is no noise.
• The very wide FOV is awesome with the Ring cameras— I have switched from a five camera Lorex system to only needing three of the Ring cameras although YMMV depending on where your cameras are placed/your particular situation. The quality of the image is as good as any of the other IP cameras I have used in the past.
• The main advantage of this system is **proactive** notification of a trespasser/criminal with Ring's proprietary software/customizable motion to text zones/etc. versus most CCTV systems which do nothing proactive to prevent crime and only provide you with footage after the fact. Rings new software features allowing multicam view on your phone but also allow much more easy review of the footage with a scrolling timeline and selectable dates: again much better than what Lorex offered on my system
in regard to your particular questions:
• I do not believe that ring actually embeds timestamps in the footage itself but this info is easily viewable from the app
• as far as I know, it is still a closed system with no capability for local recording.
• Currently the cameras only record when motion is detected but there is word that ring will soon be offering 24 hour high/continuous recording to compete with Nest.
• I believe that if your Internet goes out the cameras no longer work-- however, since the cameras are POE and not Wi-Fi, the signal never drops. My ethernet connection to the Internet almost never fails—the main issue for most people is unreliable Wi-Fi.
I highly recommend these: so much better than what I was getting with Lorex… Hope this is helpful.
So, when I evaluate this new Ring on the
Security Camera System Minimal Viable Product requirements:
#1) Reliability
POE - power and data over the ethernet vs WiFi = significant improvement on #1.
ISP / cloud failure = still not reliable
#2) IDability
Wide FOV, fisheye, 1080P = less pixel density, distorted images on edges thus less effective pixels
This new Ring camera is actually better for up close suspects, and needs to be mounted lower than Ring shows in their ads. This should be mounted 6-8 feet high to maximize the ID distance and angle on a suspects face. If mounted too high the ID distance on the horizontal will be significantly reduced and the angle poor unless you can convince thieves to look up at the camera when less than 5-6 feet horizontally from the camera's mounting vertical axis.
#3) Usefulness as evidence
VIdeo without embedded date / time stamps get kicked out of court frequently ( depends on the Judge and Defense Attorney ) - does not matter if the date is a part of the file name - that can be changed to easily and thus gets tossed as evidence.
So, Improvements in #1, worse #2, Same #3.
NOW, the big bonus clearly is the Rings alerting capability. SO, it really is more of an ALARM system than a security camera system.
A alarm system is functionally different than a security camera / surveillance camera / CCTV system.
I will do my best to answer your questions:..
I highly recommend these: so much better than what I was getting with Lorex… Hope this is helpful.
So, the theoretical ID distance for that newer Ring camera at 150° is about 7.4 feet. ( again this is theoretical and thus ignores the actual fisheye issues and the related distortions )
The following calculations are if the camera is directly angled on a face for a straight on ID image.
When a camera with a short ID distance is mounted at 10 feet high and the suspect is 6 feet and a suspect 5 feet we have the following horizontal distances:
Face is 4 feet below the camera - the horizontal ID distance = 6.19 feet ( 6 foot tall suspect vs 10 foot high mounted new POE Ring Spotlight camera )
Face is 5 feet below the camera - the horizontal ID distance = 5.4 feet ( 5 foot tall suspect )
When this camera is mounted at face level the horizontal ID distance = 7.37 feet ( thus why 6-8 feet high is a recommended high in addition to getting a good angle for a facial ID image it gives you a better horizontal ID distance ( the ID distance directly from the camera lens to the target remains the same of course )
So you can see the effect of mounting cameras too high.
These calculations will be similar for other 1080P cameras with a wide FOV.
update: fisheye distortion displayed well in the following video in the summary section https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHzyGW0
update 2: Temp range and IPxx rating of the Ring cameras also is significantly less that the better build quality of many IP POE cameras, leading me to conclude that the Ring stickup wired IP POE cameras are really intended for indoors or protected porches which do not get very cold.
https://slickdeals.net/forums/showpost.php?p=