LG 27QN600-B 27” QHD (2560 x 1440) IPS Display with FreeSync, sRGB 99% Color Gamut, HDR10 @ Amazon for $226.99

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users

Joined Oct 2015

L7: Teacher

2,952 Posts

540 Reputation

11-17-2020 at 10:54 PM #2

The 32 inch for $24 more is a better deal.

1

0

0

1

Reply

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users

Joined Jul 2015

L3: Novice

194 Posts

30 Reputation

Pro

11-17-2020 at 11:19 PM #3

Same price on B&H. In stock.
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/pr...s_1ms.html

0

Reply

Last edited by Paul8552 November 18, 2020 at 01:45 AM.

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users

Joined Oct 2014

L5: Journeyman

513 Posts

52 Reputation

11-17-2020 at 11:25 PM #4

Quote from goodness97 :

The 32 inch for $24 more is a better deal.

more money for worse ppi?

6

0

5

Reply

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users

Joined May 2014

L2: Beginner

48 Posts

18 Reputation

11-18-2020 at 12:18 AM #5

Quote from WentzelI :

more money for worse ppi?

Going by that logic everyone should be buying those 15 inch portable 4k monitors since nothing comes close to them when it comes to PPI.

And why buy a 65 inch or 70 inch 4k TV when you can buy a 40 inch 4k TV since it has higher ppi?

11

0

3

Reply

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users

Joined Apr 2005

L3: Novice

295 Posts

108 Reputation

11-18-2020 at 07:40 AM #6

Quote from aintaboutdislife :

Going by that logic everyone should be buying those 15 inch portable 4k monitors since nothing comes close to them when it comes to PPI.

And why buy a 65 inch or 70 inch 4k TV when you can buy a 40 inch 4k TV since it has higher ppi?

Viewing distance. I have a 32 inch 4096x2160 and a 25 inch 2560x1440, I wouldn't want a computer monitor larger than this 27 inch without it being higher resolution.

Same applies to TVs. A 40 inch 4K set is great from a couple feet but if you have a large room a 75 inch 4K at 10 feet is the smallest I'd buy.

2

0

2

Reply

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users

Joined Dec 2015

New User

9 Posts

10 Reputation

11-18-2020 at 07:42 AM #7

60-75hz. Pass

1

0

2

Reply

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users

Joined Oct 2014

L5: Journeyman

513 Posts

52 Reputation

11-18-2020 at 08:14 AM #8

Quote from aintaboutdislife :

Going by that logic everyone should be buying those 15 inch portable 4k monitors since nothing comes close to them when it comes to PPI.

And why buy a 65 inch or 70 inch 4k TV when you can buy a 40 inch 4k TV since it has higher ppi?

please explain to me how more money for the 32" variant is a better deal for this monitor. it's literally more money for worse ppi. unless you specifically desired 32" , it's a worse deal for most people.

3

0

4

Reply

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users

Joined Dec 2010

L6: Expert

1,414 Posts

187 Reputation

11-18-2020 at 08:24 AM #9

Quote from WentzelI :

please explain to me how more money for the 32" variant is a better deal for this monitor. it's literally more money for worse ppi. unless you specifically desired 32" , it's a worse deal for most people.

Think of it as more money for more viewing area. I don't know what's there not to get. Are you being intentionally dense?

1

0

4

Reply

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users

Joined Dec 2010

L6: Expert

1,414 Posts

187 Reputation

11-18-2020 at 08:33 AM #10

I haven't been keeping up with monitor stuff. Is HDR something to care about or is it just a marketing thing?

0

Reply

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users

Joined Oct 2014

L5: Journeyman

513 Posts

52 Reputation

11-18-2020 at 08:59 AM #11

Quote from coachclass :

Think of it as more money for more viewing area. I don't know what's there not to get. Are you being intentionally dense?

how is that a better deal than this monitor? i'm still waiting

2

0

3

Reply

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users

Joined Jun 2007

L6: Expert

1,683 Posts

135 Reputation

11-18-2020 at 09:01 AM #12

Quote from aintaboutdislife :

Going by that logic everyone should be buying those 15 inch portable 4k monitors since nothing comes close to them when it comes to PPI.

And why buy a 65 inch or 70 inch 4k TV when you can buy a 40 inch 4k TV since it has higher ppi?

With that gatorade, I am just going to use my phone then, why buy a monitor for lower ppi?

1

0

2

Reply

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users

Joined Nov 2019

New User

2 Posts

10 Reputation

11-18-2020 at 10:09 AM #13

Just remember that it's 75hz. So not a good option for competitive gaming. Assuming if you're getting 1440p then you have a nice GPU.

0

Reply

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users

Joined Feb 2009

L5: Journeyman

706 Posts

121 Reputation

11-18-2020 at 10:14 AM #14

Quote from Mghazi93 :

Just remember that it's 75hz. So not a good option for competitive gaming. Assuming if you're getting 1440p then you have a nice GPU.

Also remember that hz has rapidly diminishing returns. So 75hz is about as good of a jump over 60 that 144 is over 75.

0

Reply

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users

Joined May 2014

L2: Beginner

48 Posts

18 Reputation

11-18-2020 at 11:06 AM #15

Quote from WentzelI :

how is that a better deal than this monitor? i'm still waiting

It's a better deal because a 10% increase in price gets you the same monitor with 40% more viewing area. http://www.comparetvsizes.com/?tv...=32&a2=169

If the 32" is too big for someone then its not a good fit for their needs, but thats different from not being a better deal.

1

0

2

Reply