Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expired Posted by servant7 • Feb 1, 2021
expired Posted by servant7 • Feb 1, 2021

Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis (Kindle eBook)

$2.00

$16

87% off
Amazon
150 Comments 32,729 Views
Visit Amazon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Various Retailers have Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis (eBook) on sale for $1.99.

Thanks to community member servant7 for finding this deal.

Available from the following retailers:

Editor's Notes

Written by StrawMan86 | Staff
  • About this product:
    • 4.8 Rating at Amazon
  • About this store:

Original Post

Written by servant7
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Various Retailers have Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis (eBook) on sale for $1.99.

Thanks to community member servant7 for finding this deal.

Available from the following retailers:

Editor's Notes

Written by StrawMan86 | Staff
  • About this product:
    • 4.8 Rating at Amazon
  • About this store:

Original Post

Written by servant7

Community Voting

Deal Score
+279
Good Deal
Visit Amazon
Leave a Comment
To participate in the comments, please log in.

Top Comments

CS Lewis was an atheist who changed his mind. So your comment is as irrelevant as it is uninformed and uneducated.
But why do people read atheist books when they believe in nothing? Books are transformation mode of information, and you don't have to believe in the philosophy/religion in said books to entertain such thought and broaden your horizon.
yes this is an amazing book everyone should give it a serious look

150 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Feb 3, 2021
119 Posts
Joined Aug 2019
Feb 3, 2021
LewiDewyS
Feb 3, 2021
119 Posts
There's no reason not to believe. Nothing to lose but everything to gain. Most non-fake christians i know live very happy fulfilled lives. I'm trying to get there and not be a miserable fence sitter. Really good book if you are at a little bit curious.
5
Pro
Feb 3, 2021
1,577 Posts
Joined Feb 2008
Feb 3, 2021
rotorrocket
Pro
Feb 3, 2021
1,577 Posts
5 stars with 8,120 ratings

I'm in.
1
Feb 3, 2021
777 Posts
Joined Jul 2013
Feb 3, 2021
AndyfromFL
Feb 3, 2021
777 Posts
Quote from waitman :
Tell me more about atheist books, I'm interested. Those are founded on evidence. I've been down the stupid religion road that led to nowhere


Harry Potter doesn't have thousands of years of forced conversions, nor tell people to believe on faith or burn in hell forever and backed by a couple billion people that are still afraid of hell.

I'm in my 60's. The older I get the more comfortable I am at facing death and nothingness

There is no empirical evidence for any god. I see you did not support your comment with anything other than weak words. Your comment is an outright lie and an attempt to insult atheists which don't believe simply because there is no evidence. Evidence is the strongest factor to support any claim, including god claims. come back and try again when you get some, you won't.
So there's a long wrong with your reply. I'll help you out, free of charge.
No empirical evidence- glad to see you've walked back on your claim that there's no evidence, but I doubt you even noticed. To say that there's no empirical evidence is not to say there's no evidence, but you probably meant them to be the same. Lesson one: empirical is not the only kind of evidence.
I did not support my comment with evidence- you also didn't support your claim with evidence, so my burden of proof is no greater than yours. What you MEANT to say originally was that you've seen no evidence of a god, not that there is none- it's logically impossible to prove that there is no god or to assert that there is no evidence for one. It's crazy that I can have your side of the argument better than you can. Why are you even involved?
To say that my comment about your argument is a lie is to say that I don't myself believe it, which is something you don't believe, so it turns out that by accusing me of lying, you yourself have lied.
I made no attempt to insult atheists- it was directed at you, so you can't hide in a crowd of like minded people and pretend that I addressed them.
As soon as you admit that your 'retort' was horrible for ALL of the reasons above, then I'll show you why you yourself believe in a god and don't even know it. Not until then though. You made a claim, and I'll move on once you've admitted that it's meritless.
2
5
Feb 3, 2021
777 Posts
Joined Jul 2013
Feb 3, 2021
AndyfromFL
Feb 3, 2021
777 Posts
Quote from connordog :
As opposed to the first nipple on human males?
Poor design is pretty easily debunked as an argument against a supernatural intelligence. Would you like a link?
3
Feb 3, 2021
777 Posts
Joined Jul 2013
Feb 3, 2021
AndyfromFL
Feb 3, 2021
777 Posts
Quote from alchemista :
Unconvincing and poor logic or rationale in this book, regardless of your beliefs.
I don't suppose you can cite a single instance of poor logic in the book? and the book EITHER has poor logic OR rationale, or everything in the book is one of those two?
2
Feb 3, 2021
126 Posts
Joined Apr 2018
Feb 3, 2021
NeoCalSaint
Feb 3, 2021
126 Posts
Very respectfully, you used the right word 'evidence' but came to a wrong conclusion. Since God cant be subject to a science lab experiment because the subject at is metaphysical. Also proof in an absolute sense only occurs in mathematics. We use evidence such as historical evidence, and so on, and also in many cases where we cant prove things scientifically. We believe lot of things that we can not prove with a scientific experiment. My favorite example is you cant measure love, say in watts or joules and lbs and so on, hope you see the point. To me it requires as much faith to be an atheist as to be a theist. Agnostic is more consistent because being an atheist you are trying to disprove the thing you don't believe.
Great thign about this book is that the author himself was in your shoes. He had but one response to religion is apathy. He actually doesn't prove anything, its just a thought process that you have to go along should you choose to and come out with your conclusions after honest intellectual assessment on the merits of his arguments.

Edit: This was in response to @waitman's response, not sure what happened, thought I clicked on reply before I typed it. sorry.
Last edited by NeoCalSaint February 3, 2021 at 09:43 AM.
1
Feb 3, 2021
2,730 Posts
Joined Nov 2009
Feb 3, 2021
Kumicho
Feb 3, 2021
2,730 Posts
Rereading C. S. Lewis' book as an adult revealed quite a few disturbing aspects that I hadn't realized when I read them as a kid. Racism, in particular, was pretty prevalent throughout his books, along with a decent dose of misogyny. It also glorified the "warrior christian" ideal as opposed to actual teachings of love and compassion.

No clue about this book as I haven't read it, but his views in other books could at best be considered antiquated.
5

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Feb 3, 2021
22,529 Posts
Joined May 2010
Feb 3, 2021
deedz2
Feb 3, 2021
22,529 Posts
Quote from DrShrinker :
FREE PDF copy here https://www.pdfdrive.com/mere-chr...25361.html
Ty and repped!Smilie
Thx op, tu and repped.
Feb 3, 2021
146 Posts
Joined Jul 2016
Feb 3, 2021
LordDarksbane
Feb 3, 2021
146 Posts
Quote from LewiDewyS :
There's no reason not to believe. Nothing to lose but everything to gain. Most non-fake christians i know live very happy fulfilled lives. I'm trying to get there and not be a miserable fence sitter. Really good book if you are at a little bit curious.
Believe what? There are thousands of religions, most of which are mutually exclusive. Believing one religion results in eternal damnation in another. Furthermore, belief is not a choice. It is an involuntary response to being convinced of something.
3
Feb 3, 2021
146 Posts
Joined Jul 2016
Feb 3, 2021
LordDarksbane
Feb 3, 2021
146 Posts
Quote from NeoCalSaint :
Very respectfully, you used the right word 'evidence' but came to a wrong conclusion. Since God cant be subject to a science lab experiment because the subject at is metaphysical. Also proof in an absolute sense only occurs in mathematics. We use evidence such as historical evidence, and so on, and also in many cases where we cant prove things scientifically. We believe lot of things that we can not prove with a scientific experiment. My favorite example is you cant measure love, say in watts or joules and lbs and so on, hope you see the point. To me it requires as much faith to be an atheist as to be a theist. Agnostic is more consistent because being an atheist you are trying to disprove the thing you don't believe.
Great thign about this book is that the author himself was in your shoes. He had but one response to religion is apathy. He actually doesn't prove anything, its just a thought process that you have to go along should you choose to and come out with your conclusions after honest intellectual assessment on the merits of his arguments.

Edit: This was in response to @waitman's response, not sure what happened, thought I clicked on reply before I typed it. sorry
I appreciate that you are trying to be respectful, but you have some foundational epistemologies wrong. You see in your god claim, you have created an unfalsifiable proposition and argued for it with strawmen. If God can't be tested, i.e. because he is only metaphysical, then god does not interact with our universe. If he does interact with the universe then that interaction can be tested.

Also your love example is wrong for it can be measured. Its a chemical response in the brain and verified by observable behaviors. Indeed, everything that we have observed in our universe is subject to testing. The god of the gaps that operates in this metaphysical universe shrinks by the day.

Furthermore, Atheism requires no faith as it is merely the absence of a belief. It requires no more belief then a person who doesn't play tennis requires the ability to play tennis. Atheists by definition do not seek to disprove anything, but people who are atheists may do so. However, if this atheist asserts a god does not exist they carry the burden to prove that claim. No different than a theist.

Lastly a book filled with Lewis' personal apologetics and anecdotes is not convincing as there are literally thousands of books with apologetics for other religions.
2
Feb 3, 2021
146 Posts
Joined Jul 2016
Feb 3, 2021
LordDarksbane
Feb 3, 2021
146 Posts
Quote from AndyfromFL :
So there's a long wrong with your reply. I'll help you out, free of charge.
No empirical evidence- glad to see you've walked back on your claim that there's no evidence, but I doubt you even noticed. To say that there's no empirical evidence is not to say there's no evidence, but you probably meant them to be the same. Lesson one: empirical is not the only kind of evidence.
I did not support my comment with evidence- you also didn't support your claim with evidence, so my burden of proof is no greater than yours. What you MEANT to say originally was that you've seen no evidence of a god, not that there is none- it's logically impossible to prove that there is no god or to assert that there is no evidence for one. It's crazy that I can have your side of the argument better than you can. Why are you even involved?
To say that my comment about your argument is a lie is to say that I don't myself believe it, which is something you don't believe, so it turns out that by accusing me of lying, you yourself have lied.
I made no attempt to insult atheists- it was directed at you, so you can't hide in a crowd of like minded people and pretend that I addressed them.
As soon as you admit that your 'retort' was horrible for ALL of the reasons above, then I'll show you why you yourself believe in a god and don't even know it. Not until then though. You made a claim, and I'll move on once you've admitted that it's meritless.
I agree with your statement referring to Waitman. Saying there is no evidence for god is a bad claim. There is evidence for god, bad evidence, and indeed bad evidence for many gods. Often times people will conflate bad evidence with no evidence, or say there is no compelling evidence.

However, I have seen the evidence proffered by C.S. Lewis and other apologists and it has not overcome my natural disbelief. I therefore do not believe in the god purported by C.S. Lewis, or any other god. I do not claim that god or gods do not exist and stand ready to be convinced.

Now please tell me, no as you say, "show me", why you think I am wrong?
2
Feb 3, 2021
325 Posts
Joined Apr 2018
Feb 3, 2021
connordog
Feb 3, 2021
325 Posts
Quote from AndyfromFL :
Poor design is pretty easily debunked as an argument against a supernatural intelligence. Would you like a link?
It was a feeble joke. Lighten up Francis.
Feb 3, 2021
2,242 Posts
Joined Aug 2012
Feb 3, 2021
Advent1967
Feb 3, 2021
2,242 Posts
A good alternative book for those professing an open mind: "Why I Am Not a Christian", by Bertrand Russell (British author, philosopher, mathematician, and Nobel laureate).
5
Feb 3, 2021
119 Posts
Joined Aug 2019
Feb 3, 2021
LewiDewyS
Feb 3, 2021
119 Posts
Quote from LordDarksbane :
Believe what? There are thousands of religions, most of which are mutually exclusive. Believing one religion results in eternal damnation in another. Furthermore, belief is not a choice. It is an involuntary response to being convinced of something.
sure sure. Believe in the God CS Lewis is referring to in his book.
4

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Pro
Feb 3, 2021
7,708 Posts
Joined Sep 2016
Feb 3, 2021
JMBauer74
Pro
Feb 3, 2021
7,708 Posts
What a great book! Thumbs up for this one.

For my literature class in college, I took a class on Tolkien and Lewis. So much great material by both of them. Besides this, and the Chronicles of Narnia, I really got into The Great Divorce and The Screwtape Letters by Lewis.
2

Related Searches

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All