Nice set up, I love mine from the way it stores all the tools and fence to the way it folds up against a wall. Excellent table saw couldn't be without after having it. No more duck walking out of the garage more apt to do more projects now
It is currently OOS but I am curious if this is really worth it for 8" of more rip and 1.5" more blade vs. the 8.5" combo from HD? I don't believe it is for me but genuinely want to know.
It is currently OOS but I am curious if this is really worth it for 8" of more rip and 1.5" more blade vs. the 8.5" combo from HD? I don't believe it is for me but genuinely want to know.
I believe the greatest advantage between the two is ability to use a Dado. If you don't want/need to ever use a Dado set then that smaller one is probably the best choice.
It is currently OOS but I am curious if this is really worth it for 8" of more rip and 1.5" more blade vs. the 8.5" combo from HD? I don't believe it is for me but genuinely want to know.
Everyone will have their own use case. For me, the ability to cut 4x lumber in a single pass is important. The 8.5" saw won't do that. In fact many 10" saws won't do that (this saw won't for example).
It is currently OOS but I am curious if this is really worth it for 8" of more rip and 1.5" more blade vs. the 8.5" combo from HD? I don't believe it is for me but genuinely want to know.
Another difference is the table size. I have the discontinued model 7480, it got replaced by the 8-1/4" version, model 7485. See this for feature comparison: https://compareappliances.biz/dew...aw-to-buy/
The bigger table size gives you more control for ripping long stock. It is kind of difficult ripping stock > 4' on the small-ish table. I read in another table saw thread (I think it was a Ridgid table saw thread) that new industry safety standards dictate a table size to saw blade size ratio. That's the reason Dewalt dropped 7480 with a 10" blade and replaced it with 7485 with 8-1/4 blade". That's also the reason the current Dewalt 10" saw, 7491 has a larger table size. I don't know if this is true. Just repeating what I read. Does sound reasonable.
It is currently OOS but I am curious if this is really worth it for 8" of more rip and 1.5" more blade vs. the 8.5" combo from HD? I don't believe it is for me but genuinely want to know.
If this is going to be your main saw it is definitely worth it. If you ever decide that you want to make cabinets that 32.5" rip capacity is huge, and so is the ability to use a dado blade.
If you are just looking for a secondary portable saw, and you have a big one in your shop, than it's probably not necessary.
This is a great saw if you are looking to get into carpentry, but don't have the space, or want to spend the cash on a cabinet saw.
Another difference is the table size. I have the discontinued model 7480, it got replaced by the 8-1/4" version, model 7485. See this for feature comparison: https://compareappliances.biz/dew...aw-to-buy/
The bigger table size gives you more control for ripping long stock. It is kind of difficult ripping stock > 4' on the small-ish table. I read in another table saw thread (I think it was a Ridgid table saw thread) that new industry safety standards dictate a table size to saw blade size ratio. That's the reason Dewalt dropped 7480 with a 10" blade and replaced it with 7485 with 8-1/4 blade". That's also the reason the current Dewalt 10" saw, 7491 has a larger table size. I don't know if this is true. Just repeating what I read. Does sound reasonable.
This is true about the safety standards. No one makes a 7 1/2 table saw anymore. It is annoying because it seems like that is still kind of a niche size. I have the new Skil table saw. I was about to get this table saw, despite having a hard time justifying the price. I saw VGC review the new Skil (didn't even know it was released) and my local Menard's had it in stock for retail ($299). It can take a dado, 10" blade, better than 24" rip capacity, built in stand, and the same rack & pinion style fence. It probably has some additional chances of being a dud in terms of square out of the box. Thing to know is the maker of EGO recently bought Skil. This was their first new table saw and reviews have been super favorable. They have also started a new cordless line - no idea how it ranks since I was already invested in a different company.
Just throwing this out there since, as an occasional DIYer/woodworker, I had a hard time with the cost of even the 8 1/2" Dewalt.
Nice set up, I love mine from the way it stores all the tools and fence to the way it folds up against a wall. Excellent table saw couldn't be without after having it. No more duck walking out of the garage more apt to do more projects now
How big is it and its the foot print when folder up? I have searched but had no luck. Thank you!
This is true about the safety standards. No one makes a 7 1/2 table saw anymore. It is annoying because it seems like that is still kind of a niche size. I have the new Skil table saw. I was about to get this table saw, despite having a hard time justifying the price. I saw VGC review the new Skil (didn't even know it was released) and my local Menard's had it in stock for retail ($299). It can take a dado, 10" blade, better than 24" rip capacity, built in stand, and the same rack & pinion style fence. It probably has some additional chances of being a dud in terms of square out of the box. Thing to know is the maker of EGO recently bought Skil. This was their first new table saw and reviews have been super favorable. They have also started a new cordless line - no idea how it ranks since I was already invested in a different company.
Just throwing this out there since, as an occasional DIYer/woodworker, I had a hard time with the cost of even the 8 1/2" Dewalt.
I bought the deal for smaller Dewalt, didn't even open it yet. I am considering Skil you described (which model you had in mind?) . I rarely use table saw these days, more flexible one could be better choice
I bought the deal for smaller Dewalt, didn't even open it yet. I am considering Skil you described (which model you had in mind?) . I rarely use table saw these days, more flexible one could be better choice
It is at a bunch of places, but I think it suffers from supply issues because of demand at that price point. I have used it for a few projects and I am very relieved I spent about half of what I was going to spend. Truth is I rarely try to cut down sheet goods so a 32" rip capacity is great for like 10 cuts in my lifetime. I do have a Kreg ripcut, which would be able to be set to 16" easily enough and get the same result (or set my table saw to 16" and have a helper or two).
I'm torn here. I'm literally picking up the 8 1/4" version w/rolling stand from HD today, which I ordered 3 weeks ago. Got it at the Slick Deals price of $390 after tax.
In those 3 weeks I've done nothing but watch woodworking videos (thinking I'll start as a new hobby, transitioning my trim work skills). Now I know what dados are, etc.
I figured I can just cut dados with a router, and I wouldn't want to swap out the stack in the table saw all the time, but then I got to thinking that dados using the fence on a table saw would be much more precise than "freehanding" with a router.
I'm torn here. I'm literally picking up the 8 1/4" version w/rolling stand from HD today, which I ordered 3 weeks ago. Got it at the Slick Deals price of $390 after tax.
In those 3 weeks I've done nothing but watch woodworking videos (thinking I'll start as a new hobby, transitioning my trim work skills). Now I know what dados are, etc.
I figured I can just cut dados with a router, and I wouldn't want to swap out the stack in the table saw all the time, but then I got to thinking that dados using the fence on a table saw would be much more precise than "freehanding" with a router.
Thoughts?
It comes down to a few things :
Max rip capacity
Dado support
Thickness of material
If you're happy with the 8.25" numbers, save your money.
I have the unit in this deal. It is phenomenal. With that said, my suggestion would be to keep what you got and if you ever out grow it to then look into either a contractor saw or even a full cabinet saw.
I'm torn here. I'm literally picking up the 8 1/4" version w/rolling stand from HD today, which I ordered 3 weeks ago. Got it at the Slick Deals price of $390 after tax.
In those 3 weeks I've done nothing but watch woodworking videos (thinking I'll start as a new hobby, transitioning my trim work skills). Now I know what dados are, etc.
I figured I can just cut dados with a router, and I wouldn't want to swap out the stack in the table saw all the time, but then I got to thinking that dados using the fence on a table saw would be much more precise than "freehanding" with a router.
Thoughts?
Instead or freehanding with the router, you could get a router table. 😉 more tools 😆
35 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
The bigger table size gives you more control for ripping long stock. It is kind of difficult ripping stock > 4' on the small-ish table. I read in another table saw thread (I think it was a Ridgid table saw thread) that new industry safety standards dictate a table size to saw blade size ratio. That's the reason Dewalt dropped 7480 with a 10" blade and replaced it with 7485 with 8-1/4 blade". That's also the reason the current Dewalt 10" saw, 7491 has a larger table size. I don't know if this is true. Just repeating what I read. Does sound reasonable.
If you are just looking for a secondary portable saw, and you have a big one in your shop, than it's probably not necessary.
This is a great saw if you are looking to get into carpentry, but don't have the space, or want to spend the cash on a cabinet saw.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
The bigger table size gives you more control for ripping long stock. It is kind of difficult ripping stock > 4' on the small-ish table. I read in another table saw thread (I think it was a Ridgid table saw thread) that new industry safety standards dictate a table size to saw blade size ratio. That's the reason Dewalt dropped 7480 with a 10" blade and replaced it with 7485 with 8-1/4 blade". That's also the reason the current Dewalt 10" saw, 7491 has a larger table size. I don't know if this is true. Just repeating what I read. Does sound reasonable.
This is true about the safety standards. No one makes a 7 1/2 table saw anymore. It is annoying because it seems like that is still kind of a niche size. I have the new Skil table saw. I was about to get this table saw, despite having a hard time justifying the price. I saw VGC review the new Skil (didn't even know it was released) and my local Menard's had it in stock for retail ($299). It can take a dado, 10" blade, better than 24" rip capacity, built in stand, and the same rack & pinion style fence. It probably has some additional chances of being a dud in terms of square out of the box. Thing to know is the maker of EGO recently bought Skil. This was their first new table saw and reviews have been super favorable. They have also started a new cordless line - no idea how it ranks since I was already invested in a different company.
Just throwing this out there since, as an occasional DIYer/woodworker, I had a hard time with the cost of even the 8 1/2" Dewalt.
How big is it and its the foot print when folder up? I have searched but had no luck. Thank you!
Just throwing this out there since, as an occasional DIYer/woodworker, I had a hard time with the cost of even the 8 1/2" Dewalt.
I bought the deal for smaller Dewalt, didn't even open it yet. I am considering Skil you described (which model you had in mind?) . I rarely use table saw these days, more flexible one could be better choice
Skil TS6307. https://www.skil.com/15-amp-10inc...ts6307-00/
It is at a bunch of places, but I think it suffers from supply issues because of demand at that price point. I have used it for a few projects and I am very relieved I spent about half of what I was going to spend. Truth is I rarely try to cut down sheet goods so a 32" rip capacity is great for like 10 cuts in my lifetime. I do have a Kreg ripcut, which would be able to be set to 16" easily enough and get the same result (or set my table saw to 16" and have a helper or two).
In those 3 weeks I've done nothing but watch woodworking videos (thinking I'll start as a new hobby, transitioning my trim work skills). Now I know what dados are, etc.
I figured I can just cut dados with a router, and I wouldn't want to swap out the stack in the table saw all the time, but then I got to thinking that dados using the fence on a table saw would be much more precise than "freehanding" with a router.
Thoughts?
In those 3 weeks I've done nothing but watch woodworking videos (thinking I'll start as a new hobby, transitioning my trim work skills). Now I know what dados are, etc.
I figured I can just cut dados with a router, and I wouldn't want to swap out the stack in the table saw all the time, but then I got to thinking that dados using the fence on a table saw would be much more precise than "freehanding" with a router.
Thoughts?
It comes down to a few things :
Max rip capacity
Dado support
Thickness of material
If you're happy with the 8.25" numbers, save your money.
I have the unit in this deal. It is phenomenal. With that said, my suggestion would be to keep what you got and if you ever out grow it to then look into either a contractor saw or even a full cabinet saw.
In those 3 weeks I've done nothing but watch woodworking videos (thinking I'll start as a new hobby, transitioning my trim work skills). Now I know what dados are, etc.
I figured I can just cut dados with a router, and I wouldn't want to swap out the stack in the table saw all the time, but then I got to thinking that dados using the fence on a table saw would be much more precise than "freehanding" with a router.
Thoughts?
Instead or freehanding with the router, you could get a router table. 😉 more tools 😆