Home Depot has
Pro-Lift 3-Ton T-6903D Double Pin Jack Stands for
$27.33.
Shipping is free or choose curbside pickup where stock permits.
Thanks to Community Member
fibrepunk for finding this deal.
Features: - 3-Ton double locking pin jack stands (pair)
- Lifting from 11-3/8 in. to 16-3/4 in.
- Double locks mechanism with both handle locks and mobility pin
- Height adjustment mechanism allows smooth upward movement while release handle locks and mobility pin
- Meets or exceeds ANSI/PALD standards, ideal for home, auto, truck service, farm and shop use
102 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
The ones I received from the last FP had great welds. No problem at all.
It can lift high enough to clear the tires off the ground.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
As previously mentioned... Harbor freight but I would recommend the long reach one. I use that on my lifted gx470 and it works great
Serves me well for more than 10 years and handily takes on work on my 2 SUVs and a sedan. Aluminum is light weight and strong. Folks you don't want to save on your safety.
Quality floor jacks and jack stands can save your life. People died from jack and jack stands failure.
I still wouldn't trust any made in China jackstsnd, period. Single or double. Too many failures and recalls.
Absolutely foolish to risk your like of Chicom corner cutting.
Yes, the 100% guarantee of wood blocks on their side. Staggering crush rating.
What is this, a bench press stand for ANTS?? ... It needs to be at least THREE TIMES bigger than this!!
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
https://www.homedepot.c
Welds look great though. No significant pores.
What does that mean?
A: That you shouldn't use the single pair of combined 3T stands in one package to balance the car precariously wobbling in mid air like a see-saw by putting one single stand on one end and the other single stand in the package of two on the other side? Ok yeah that's a no-brainer of course.
or
B: Don't use this jack stand product at all to hold a vehicle fully lifted by placing say four of these kinds of jack stands around the periphery of the vehicle e.g. two spread over the forward / rear driver side lifting points, two spread over the passenger side forward / rear lifting points, or say two on the rear axle, two behind the front wheels at the lifting points, etc.?
If that (B) is bad practice then why is that so and what is the acceptable safe good practice alternative besides a vehicle lift or ramp or such? It seems like I've heard several people suggesting to do (B) to lift all of a passenger car's tires off the ground using four jack stands spread front & rear & left side & right side so one can rotate the tires or so on, so is that just bad advice?
Or is this particular jack model / manufacturer just not advocating the practice and some / most other jack stands are accepted for such use?
Granted I guess I'd probably want a 6T rated set of four for such purpose even with a light vehicle just to get higher stable lift even on a 1.75T vehicle if needing to work underneath with better clearance to do significant work down there.
What are the suggested options for a modest full vehicle lift for a small sedan adequate to have the vehicle level and make it easy to work underneath (e.g. on a creeper with room to use some tools) on an infrequent / inexpensive basis without the suitability of buying a much more costly and space / resource requiring lift?
What does that mean?
A: That you shouldn't use the single pair of combined 3T stands in one package to balance the car precariously wobbling in mid air like a see-saw by putting one single stand on one end and the other single stand in the package of two on the other side? Ok yeah that's a no-brainer of course.
or
B: Don't use this jack stand product at all to hold a vehicle fully lifted by placing say four of these kinds of jack stands around the periphery of the vehicle e.g. two spread over the forward / rear driver side lifting points, two spread over the passenger side forward / rear lifting points, or say two on the rear axle, two behind the front wheels at the lifting points, etc.?
If that (B) is bad practice then why is that so and what is the acceptable safe good practice alternative besides a vehicle lift or ramp or such? It seems like I've heard several people suggesting to do (B) to lift all of a passenger car's tires off the ground using four jack stands spread front & rear & left side & right side so one can rotate the tires or so on, so is that just bad advice?
Or is this particular jack model / manufacturer just not advocating the practice and some / most other jack stands are accepted for such use?
Granted I guess I'd probably want a 6T rated set of four for such purpose even with a light vehicle just to get higher stable lift even on a 1.75T vehicle if needing to work underneath with better clearance to do significant work down there.
What are the suggested options for a modest full vehicle lift for a small sedan adequate to have the vehicle level and make it easy to work underneath (e.g. on a creeper with room to use some tools) on an infrequent / inexpensive basis without the suitability of buying a much more costly and space / resource requiring lift?
I think the main problem is that if you have one end/side of the vehicle supported on stands, when you go to jack up the other end/side, the vehicle pivots, albeit ever so slightly, around the top of the jack stands - which are not really made for that.
Additionally, if your floor jack isn't rolling completely freely, you'll be introducing some sideways loads on the jack stands which could cause them to buckle or topple.
That being said, I do it all the time. However, I use jackstands rated at or above the gross vehicle weight for an extra margin of safety and am aware of, and constantly double check for potential issues including jacking up each end again to check/reposition the stands and relieve any screwy loads that may have been induced.
Then before removing the wheels or going underneath, I try, and I try really hard, to push the car off.